Literature DB >> 19436101

Intensity correction with a pair of spoiled gradient recalled echo images.

Olivier Noterdaeme1, Mark Anderson, Fergus Gleeson, Sir Michael Brady.   

Abstract

Intensity inhomogeneities in magnetic resonance images (MRI) are a frequently occurring artefact, and result in the same tissue class to have vastly different intensities within an image. These inhomogeneities can be modelled by a slowly varying field, which is also called the bias field. Previous phantom-, image- or sequence based approaches suffer from long scan times, post-processing times or do not sufficiently remove the intensity variations. These intensity variations cause problems for quantitative image analysis algorithms (segmentation, registration) as well as clinicians (e.g. by complicating the visual assessment). This paper presents a novel technique (COIN, correction of intensity inhomogeneities) that uses two calibration images (fast spoiled gradient echo) to map a parameter containing the bias field, which is specific to the patient during a particular exam. This parametric map can then be used to correct any other images acquired during the same exam, regardless of the sequence employed. By using a short repetition time (less than 5 ms) for the calibration scans, the additional scan time is reduced to 60 s (max). The subsequent post-processing time is approximately 60 s per 20 slices. We successfully validate our approach on simulated brain MRI as well as real liver and spinal images. These images were acquired with a number of different coils, sequences and weightings. A comparison of our method with an existing, commercially available algorithm by radiologists shows that COIN is superior.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19436101     DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/54/11/013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  6 in total

1.  Fast T1 mapping determined using incomplete inversion recovery look-locker 3D balanced SSFP acquisition and a simple two-parameter model fit.

Authors:  Neville D Gai; John A Butman
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2012-01-26       Impact factor: 4.813

2.  Evaluating quantitative proton-density-mapping methods.

Authors:  Aviv Mezer; Ariel Rokem; Shai Berman; Trevor Hastie; Brian A Wandell
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2016-06-06       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  An iterative two-threshold analysis for single-subject functional MRI of the human brain.

Authors:  Tibor Auer; Renate Schweizer; Jens Frahm
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2011-06-28       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Test-retest reliability of myelin imaging in the human spinal cord: Measurement errors versus region- and aging-induced variations.

Authors:  Simon Lévy; Marie-Claude Guertin; Ali Khatibi; Aviv Mezer; Kristina Martinu; Jen-I Chen; Nikola Stikov; Pierre Rainville; Julien Cohen-Adad
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-01-02       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Surface Coil Intensity Correction in Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Spinal Metastases.

Authors:  Hong Ren; Wei Lin; Xianjun Ding
Journal:  Open Med (Wars)       Date:  2017-05-20

6.  Quantifying the local tissue volume and composition in individual brains with magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Aviv Mezer; Jason D Yeatman; Nikola Stikov; Kendrick N Kay; Nam-Joon Cho; Robert F Dougherty; Michael L Perry; Josef Parvizi; Le H Hua; Kim Butts-Pauly; Brian A Wandell
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2013-11-03       Impact factor: 53.440

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.