Literature DB >> 19436100

Dosimetry robustness with stochastic optimization.

Omid Nohadani1, Joao Seco, Benjamin C Martin, Thomas Bortfeld.   

Abstract

All radiation therapy treatment planning relies on accurate dose calculation. Uncertainties in dosimetric prediction can significantly degrade an otherwise optimal plan. In this work, we introduce a robust optimization method which handles dosimetric errors and warrants for high-quality IMRT plans. Unlike other dose error estimations, we do not rely on the detailed knowledge about the sources of the uncertainty and use a generic error model based on random perturbation. This generality is sought in order to cope with a large variety of error sources. We demonstrate the method on a clinical case of lung cancer and show that our method provides plans that are more robust against dosimetric errors and are clinically acceptable. In fact, the robust plan exhibits a two-fold improved equivalent uniform dose compared to the non-robust but optimized plan. The achieved speedup will allow computationally extensive multi-criteria or beam-angle optimization approaches to warrant for dosimetrically relevant plans.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19436100     DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/54/11/010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  3 in total

1.  Motion management with phase-adapted 4D-optimization.

Authors:  Omid Nohadani; Joao Seco; Thomas Bortfeld
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2010-08-16       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  The clinical impact of uncertainties in the mean excitation energy of human tissues during proton therapy.

Authors:  Abigail Besemer; Harald Paganetti; Bryan Bednarz
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2013-01-21       Impact factor: 3.609

3.  On correlations in IMRT planning aims.

Authors:  Arkajyoti Roy; Indra J Das; Omid Nohadani
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2016-11-08       Impact factor: 2.102

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.