Literature DB >> 19436018

Aspirin for the prevention of cardiovascular events in patients with peripheral artery disease: a meta-analysis of randomized trials.

Jeffrey S Berger1, Mori J Krantz, John M Kittelson, William R Hiatt.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: Randomized trials have shown that aspirin decreases the risk of cardiovascular events in patients with symptomatic coronary and cerebrovascular disease. Despite guideline recommendations for secondary prevention in peripheral artery disease (PAD), the effect of aspirin in this population is not well established.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of aspirin on cardiovascular event rates in patients with PAD. DATA SOURCES AND STUDY SELECTION: MEDLINE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, EMBASE, Science Citation Index (1966 to December 2008), and unpublished studies from the supplemental index of the Antithrombotic Trialists' Collaboration. Eligible studies were prospective, randomized controlled trials of aspirin therapy, with or without dipyridamole that reported cardiovascular event rates. Eighteen trials involving 5269 individuals were identified. DATA EXTRACTION: Studies were reviewed to determine the number of participants, mean follow-up, and the primary end point of cardiovascular events (nonfatal myocardial infarction [MI], nonfatal stroke, and cardiovascular death). Data on the secondary end points of all-cause mortality, major bleeding, and the individual components of the primary outcome measure were also abstracted. For the primary end point, the analysis had 88% power to detect a 25% reduction and 70% power to detect a 20% reduction in cardiovascular events in the aspirin group compared with the control group. DATA SYNTHESIS: Among 5269 participants, cardiovascular events were experienced by 251 (8.9%) of 2823 patients taking aspirin (alone or with dipyridamole) and by 269 (11.0%) of 2446 in the control group (pooled relative risk [RR], 0.88; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.76-1.04). Aspirin therapy was associated with a reduction in the secondary outcome of nonfatal stroke (52 of 2823 vs 76 of 2446; RR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.47-0.94) but was not associated with significant reductions in all-cause or cardiovascular mortality, MI, or major bleeding. In the subset of 3019 participants taking aspirin alone vs control, aspirin was associated with a nonsignificant reduction in cardiovascular events (125 of 1516 vs 144 of 1503; RR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.48-1.18), a significant reduction in nonfatal stroke (32 of 1516 vs 51 of 1503; RR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.42-0.99), but no statistically significant reductions in all-cause or cardiovascular mortality, MI, or major bleeding.
CONCLUSIONS: In patients with PAD, treatment with aspirin alone or with dipyridamole resulted in a statistically nonsignificant decrease in the primary end point of cardiovascular events and a significant reduction in nonfatal stroke. Results for the primary end point may reflect limited statistical power. Additional randomized controlled trials of aspirin therapy are needed to establish the net benefit and bleeding risks in PAD.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19436018     DOI: 10.1001/jama.2009.623

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  62 in total

Review 1.  New antithrombotic drugs: Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines.

Authors:  Jeffrey I Weitz; John W Eikelboom; Meyer Michel Samama
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 9.410

2.  Antiplatelet therapy: aspirin for asymptomatic atherosclerosis?

Authors:  Carlo Patrono; Colin Baigent
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 32.419

Review 3.  Antithrombotic Treatment for Symptomatic Peripheral Artery Disease.

Authors:  Yi-Heng Li; Hung-I Yeh; Juey-Jen Hwang
Journal:  Acta Cardiol Sin       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 2.672

Review 4.  Peripheral arterial disease.

Authors:  Kevin Cassar
Journal:  BMJ Clin Evid       Date:  2011-01-11

Review 5.  Clinical Assessment of Peripheral Arterial Disease in the Office: What Do the Guidelines Say?

Authors:  Srini Tummala; Derek Scherbel
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2019-02-05       Impact factor: 1.513

6.  In Reply.

Authors:  Holger Lawall; Peter Huppert; Christine Espinola-Klein; Gerhard Rümenapf
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2017-03-24       Impact factor: 5.594

7.  Prescriptions Are the Remit of the Doctor.

Authors:  Frank P Meyer
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2017-03-24       Impact factor: 5.594

Review 8.  2016 AHA/ACC Guideline on the Management of Patients With Lower Extremity Peripheral Artery Disease: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines.

Authors:  Marie D Gerhard-Herman; Heather L Gornik; Coletta Barrett; Neal R Barshes; Matthew A Corriere; Douglas E Drachman; Lee A Fleisher; Francis Gerry R Fowkes; Naomi M Hamburg; Scott Kinlay; Robert Lookstein; Sanjay Misra; Leila Mureebe; Jeffrey W Olin; Rajan A G Patel; Judith G Regensteiner; Andres Schanzer; Mehdi H Shishehbor; Kerry J Stewart; Diane Treat-Jacobson; M Eileen Walsh
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2016-11-13       Impact factor: 29.690

9.  Fourth Asian PAD Workshop.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ann Vasc Dis       Date:  2013

10.  Clot strength is negatively associated with ambulatory function in patients with peripheral artery disease and intermittent claudication.

Authors:  Karin Mauer; Andrew W Gardner; Tarun W Dasari; Julie A Stoner; Steve M Blevins; Polly S Montgomery; Jorge F Saucedo; J Emilio Exaire
Journal:  Angiology       Date:  2014-04-27       Impact factor: 3.619

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.