Literature DB >> 19435713

Rapid validation of Mascot search results via stable isotope labeling, pair picking, and deconvolution of fragmentation patterns.

Samuel L Volchenboum1, Kolbrun Kristjansdottir, Donald Wolfgeher, Stephen J Kron.   

Abstract

Conventional LC-MS/MS data analysis matches each precursor ion and fragmentation pattern to their best fit within databases of theoretical spectra, yielding a peptide identification. Confidence is estimated by a score but can be validated by statistics, false discovery rates, and/or manual validation. A weakness is that each ion is evaluated independently, discarding potentially useful cross-correlations. In a classical approach to de novo sequence analysis, mixtures of peptides differing only in a carboxyl-terminal isotopic label yield fragmentation spectra with single, unlabeled b-type ions but pairs of isotope-labeled y-type ions, facilitating confident assignments. To apply this principle to identification by fragmentation pattern matching, we developed Validator, software that recognizes isotopic peptide pairs and compares their identifications and fragmentation patterns. Testing Validator 1 on a Mascot results file from FT-ICR LC-MS/MS of (16)O/(18)O-labeled yeast cell lysate peptides yielded 2,775 peptide pairs sharing a common identification but differing in carboxyl-terminal label. Comparing observed b- and y-ions with the predicted fragmentation pattern improved the threshold Mascot score for 5% false discovery from 36 to 22, significantly increasing both sensitivity and specificity. Validator 2, which identifies pairs by precursor mass difference alone before comparing observed fragmentation with that predicted by Mascot, found 2,021 isotopic pairs, similarly achieving improved sensitivity and specificity. Finally Validator 3, which finds pairs based on mass difference alone and then deconvolutes fragmentation patterns independently of Mascot, found 964 predicted peptides. Validator 3 allowed raw mass spectrometry data to be mined not only to validate Mascot results but also to discover peptides missed by Mascot. Using standard desktop hardware, the Validator 1-3 software processed the 11,536 spectra in the 93-MB Mascot .DAT file in less than 6 min (32 spectra/s), revealing high confidence peptide identifications without regard to Mascot score, far faster than manual or other independent validation methods.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19435713      PMCID: PMC2722775          DOI: 10.1074/mcp.M800472-MCP200

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics        ISSN: 1535-9476            Impact factor:   5.911


  56 in total

1.  Empirical statistical model to estimate the accuracy of peptide identifications made by MS/MS and database search.

Authors:  Andrew Keller; Alexey I Nesvizhskii; Eugene Kolker; Ruedi Aebersold
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2002-10-15       Impact factor: 6.986

2.  GutenTag: high-throughput sequence tagging via an empirically derived fragmentation model.

Authors:  David L Tabb; Anita Saraf; John R Yates
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2003-12-01       Impact factor: 6.986

3.  Differential stable isotope labeling of peptides for quantitation and de novo sequence derivation.

Authors:  D R Goodlett; A Keller; J D Watts; R Newitt; E C Yi; S Purvine; J K Eng; P von Haller ; R Aebersold; E Kolker
Journal:  Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 2.419

4.  NovoHMM: a hidden Markov model for de novo peptide sequencing.

Authors:  Bernd Fischer; Volker Roth; Franz Roos; Jonas Grossmann; Sacha Baginsky; Peter Widmayer; Wilhelm Gruissem; Joachim M Buhmann
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2005-11-15       Impact factor: 6.986

5.  PepNovo: de novo peptide sequencing via probabilistic network modeling.

Authors:  Ari Frank; Pavel Pevzner
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2005-02-15       Impact factor: 6.986

6.  The Mass Distance Fingerprint: a statistical framework for de novo detection of predominant modifications using high-accuracy mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Frank Potthast; Bertran Gerrits; Jari Häkkinen; Dorothea Rutishauser; Christian H Ahrens; Bernd Roschitzki; Katja Baerenfaller; Richard P Munton; Pascal Walther; Peter Gehrig; Philipp Seif; Peter H Seeberger; Ralph Schlapbach
Journal:  J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci       Date:  2007-04-25       Impact factor: 3.205

7.  De novo peptide sequencing in an ion trap mass spectrometer with 18O labeling.

Authors:  J Qin; C J Herring; X Zhang
Journal:  Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 2.419

8.  Error-tolerant identification of peptides in sequence databases by peptide sequence tags.

Authors:  M Mann; M Wilm
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  1994-12-15       Impact factor: 6.986

9.  Protease-catalyzed incorporation of 18O into peptide fragments and its application for protein sequencing by electrospray and matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization mass spectrometry.

Authors:  M Schnölzer; P Jedrzejewski; W D Lehmann
Journal:  Electrophoresis       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 3.535

10.  Quantitative proteome analysis of human plasma following in vivo lipopolysaccharide administration using 16O/18O labeling and the accurate mass and time tag approach.

Authors:  Wei-Jun Qian; Matthew E Monroe; Tao Liu; Jon M Jacobs; Gordon A Anderson; Yufeng Shen; Ronald J Moore; David J Anderson; Rui Zhang; Steve E Calvano; Stephen F Lowry; Wenzhong Xiao; Lyle L Moldawer; Ronald W Davis; Ronald G Tompkins; David G Camp; Richard D Smith
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2005-03-07       Impact factor: 5.911

View more
  4 in total

1.  Metaproteomics analysis reveals the adaptation process for the chicken gut microbiota.

Authors:  Yue Tang; Anthony Underwood; Adriana Gielbert; Martin J Woodward; Liljana Petrovska
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2013-11-08       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Annotator: postprocessing software for generating function-based signatures from quantitative mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Juliesta E Sylvester; Tyler S Bray; Stephen J Kron
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2012-02-03       Impact factor: 4.466

3.  Neutron encoded labeling for peptide identification.

Authors:  Christopher M Rose; Anna E Merrill; Derek J Bailey; Alexander S Hebert; Michael S Westphall; Joshua J Coon
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2013-05-02       Impact factor: 6.986

4.  PRIDE Inspector Toolsuite: Moving Toward a Universal Visualization Tool for Proteomics Data Standard Formats and Quality Assessment of ProteomeXchange Datasets.

Authors:  Yasset Perez-Riverol; Qing-Wei Xu; Rui Wang; Julian Uszkoreit; Johannes Griss; Aniel Sanchez; Florian Reisinger; Attila Csordas; Tobias Ternent; Noemi Del-Toro; Jose A Dianes; Martin Eisenacher; Henning Hermjakob; Juan Antonio Vizcaíno
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2015-11-06       Impact factor: 5.911

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.