OBJECTIVE: In the present study, we have examined the safety and efficacy of recombinant adenovirus encoding human p53 tumor suppressor gene (rAd-p53) injection in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in the combination with the therapy of bronchial arterial infusion (BAI). METHODS: A total of 58 patients with advanced NSCLC were enrolled in a non-randomized, two-armed clinical trial. Of which, 19 received a combination treatment of BAI and rAd-p53 (the combo group), while the remaining 39 were treated with only BAI (the control group). Patients were followed up for 12 months, with safety and local response evaluated by the National Cancer Institute's Common Toxicity Criteria and response evaluation criteria in solid tumor (RECIST), respectively. Time to progression (TTP) andsurvival rates were also analyzed by Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: In the combo group, 19 patients received a total of 49 injections of rAd-p53 and 46 times of BAI, respectively, while 39 patients in the control group received a total of 113 times of BAI. The combination treatment was found to have less adverse events such as anorexia, nausea and emesis, pain, and leucopenia (P<0.05) but more arthralgia, fever, influenza-like symptom, and myalgia (P<0.05), compared with the control group. The overall response rates (complete response (CR)+partial response (PR)) were 47.3% and 38.4% for the combo group and the control group, respectively (P>0.05). Patients in the combo group had a longer TTP than those in the control group (a median 7.75 vs 5.5 months, P=0.018). However, the combination treatment did not lead to better survival, with survival rates at 3, 6, and 12 months in the combo group being 94.74%, 89.47%, and 52.63%, respectively, compared with 92.31%, 69.23%, and 38.83% in the control group (P=0.224). CONCLUSION: Our results show that the combination of rAd-p53 and BAI was well tolerated in patients with NSCLC and may have improved the quality of life and delayed the disease progression. A further study to better determine the efficacy of this combination therapy is warranted.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: In the present study, we have examined the safety and efficacy of recombinant adenovirus encoding humanp53tumor suppressor gene (rAd-p53) injection in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in the combination with the therapy of bronchial arterial infusion (BAI). METHODS: A total of 58 patients with advanced NSCLC were enrolled in a non-randomized, two-armed clinical trial. Of which, 19 received a combination treatment of BAI and rAd-p53 (the combo group), while the remaining 39 were treated with only BAI (the control group). Patients were followed up for 12 months, with safety and local response evaluated by the National Cancer Institute's Common Toxicity Criteria and response evaluation criteria in solid tumor (RECIST), respectively. Time to progression (TTP) and survival rates were also analyzed by Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: In the combo group, 19 patients received a total of 49 injections of rAd-p53 and 46 times of BAI, respectively, while 39 patients in the control group received a total of 113 times of BAI. The combination treatment was found to have less adverse events such as anorexia, nausea and emesis, pain, and leucopenia (P<0.05) but more arthralgia, fever, influenza-like symptom, and myalgia (P<0.05), compared with the control group. The overall response rates (complete response (CR)+partial response (PR)) were 47.3% and 38.4% for the combo group and the control group, respectively (P>0.05). Patients in the combo group had a longer TTP than those in the control group (a median 7.75 vs 5.5 months, P=0.018). However, the combination treatment did not lead to better survival, with survival rates at 3, 6, and 12 months in the combo group being 94.74%, 89.47%, and 52.63%, respectively, compared with 92.31%, 69.23%, and 38.83% in the control group (P=0.224). CONCLUSION: Our results show that the combination of rAd-p53 and BAI was well tolerated in patients with NSCLC and may have improved the quality of life and delayed the disease progression. A further study to better determine the efficacy of this combination therapy is warranted.
Authors: P Therasse; S G Arbuck; E A Eisenhauer; J Wanders; R S Kaplan; L Rubinstein; J Verweij; M Van Glabbeke; A T van Oosterom; M C Christian; S G Gwyther Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2000-02-02 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Stephen G Swisher; Jack A Roth; Ritsuko Komaki; Jian Gu; J Jack Lee; Marshall Hicks; Jae Y Ro; Waun K Hong; James A Merritt; Kamaran Ahrar; N Edward Atkinson; Arlene M Correa; Marcelo Dolormente; Linda Dreiling; Adel K El-Naggar; Frank Fossella; Rhodette Francisco; Bonnie Glisson; Susan Grammer; Roy Herbst; Armando Huaringa; Bonnie Kemp; Fadlo R Khuri; Jonathan M Kurie; Zhongxio Liao; Timothy J McDonnell; Rudolfo Morice; Frank Morello; Reginald Munden; Vassiliki Papadimitrakopoulou; Katherine M W Pisters; Joe B Putnam; Arcenio J Sarabia; Thomas Shelton; Craig Stevens; Daniel M Shin; William R Smythe; Ara A Vaporciyan; Garrett L Walsh; Min Yin Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2003-01 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: M Hollstein; K Rice; M S Greenblatt; T Soussi; R Fuchs; T Sørlie; E Hovig; B Smith-Sørensen; R Montesano; C C Harris Journal: Nucleic Acids Res Date: 1994-09 Impact factor: 16.971
Authors: Anil Vachani; Edmund Moon; Elliot Wakeam; Andrew R Haas; Daniel H Sterman; Steven M Albelda Journal: Clin Chest Med Date: 2011-10-07 Impact factor: 2.878
Authors: Sam L Stephen; Katie Freestone; Sarah Dunn; Michael W Twigg; Shervanthi Homer-Vanniasinkam; John H Walker; Stephen B Wheatcroft; Sreenivasan Ponnambalam Journal: Int J Hypertens Date: 2010-08-17 Impact factor: 2.420