Literature DB >> 19434508

Factors affecting feeling-of-knowing in a medical intelligent tutoring system: the role of immediate feedback as a metacognitive scaffold.

Gilan M El Saadawi1,2, Roger Azevedo3, Melissa Castine1, Velma Payne1, Olga Medvedeva1, Eugene Tseytlin1, Elizabeth Legowski1, Drazen Jukic1,4,5, Rebecca S Crowley6,7,8.   

Abstract

Previous studies in our laboratory have shown the benefits of immediate feedback on cognitive performance for pathology residents using an intelligent tutoring system (ITS) in pathology. In this study, we examined the effect of immediate feedback on metacognitive performance, and investigated whether other metacognitive scaffolds will support metacognitive gains when immediate feedback is faded. Twenty-three participants were randomized into intervention and control groups. For both groups, periods working with the ITS under varying conditions were alternated with independent computer-based assessments. On day 1, a within-subjects design was used to evaluate the effect of immediate feedback on cognitive and metacognitive performance. On day 2, a between-subjects design was used to compare the use of other metacognitive scaffolds (intervention group) against no metacognitive scaffolds (control group) on cognitive and metacognitive performance, as immediate feedback was faded. Measurements included learning gains (a measure of cognitive performance), as well as several measures of metacognitive performance, including Goodman-Kruskal gamma correlation (G), bias, and discrimination. For the intervention group, we also computed metacognitive measures during tutoring sessions. Results showed that immediate feedback in an intelligent tutoring system had a statistically significant positive effect on learning gains, G and discrimination. Removal of immediate feedback was associated with decreasing metacognitive performance, and this decline was not prevented when students used a version of the tutoring system that provided other metacognitive scaffolds. Results obtained directly from the ITS suggest that other metacognitive scaffolds do have a positive effect on G and discrimination, as immediate feedback is faded. We conclude that immediate feedback had a positive effect on both metacognitive and cognitive gains in a medical tutoring system. Other metacognitive scaffolds were not sufficient to replace immediate feedback in this study. However, results obtained directly from the tutoring system are not consistent with results obtained from assessments. In order to facilitate transfer to real-world tasks, further research will be needed to determine the optimum methods for supporting metacognition as immediate feedback is faded.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19434508      PMCID: PMC2815142          DOI: 10.1007/s10459-009-9162-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract        ISSN: 1382-4996            Impact factor:   3.853


  10 in total

1.  Structured computer-based training in the interpretation of neuroradiological images.

Authors:  M Sharples; N P Jeffery; B du Boulay; B A Teather; D Teather; G H du Boulay
Journal:  Int J Med Inform       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 4.046

2.  Individual differences in metacognition: evidence against a general metacognitive ability.

Authors:  W L Kelemen; P J Frost; C A Weaver
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2000-01

3.  The interactive examination: assessing students' self-assessment ability.

Authors:  Nikos Mattheos; Anders Nattestad; Eva Falk-Nilsson; Rolf Attström
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 6.251

Review 4.  An intelligent tutoring system that generates a natural language dialogue using dynamic multi-level planning.

Authors:  Chong Woo Woo; Martha W Evens; Reva Freedman; Michael Glass; Leem Seop Shim; Yuemei Zhang; Yujian Zhou; Joel Michael
Journal:  Artif Intell Med       Date:  2005-12-13       Impact factor: 5.326

5.  Diagnostic error in internal medicine.

Authors:  Mark L Graber; Nancy Franklin; Ruthanna Gordon
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2005-07-11

6.  Evaluation of an intelligent tutoring system in pathology: effects of external representation on performance gains, metacognition, and acceptance.

Authors:  Rebecca S Crowley; Elizabeth Legowski; Olga Medvedeva; Eugene Tseytlin; Ellen Roh; Drazen Jukic
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2007-01-09       Impact factor: 4.497

7.  An intelligent tutoring system for visual classification problem solving.

Authors:  Rebecca S Crowley; Olga Medvedeva
Journal:  Artif Intell Med       Date:  2005-08-10       Impact factor: 5.326

8.  A natural language intelligent tutoring system for training pathologists: implementation and evaluation.

Authors:  Gilan M El Saadawi; Eugene Tseytlin; Elizabeth Legowski; Drazen Jukic; Melissa Castine; Jeffrey Fine; Robert Gormley; Rebecca S Crowley
Journal:  Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract       Date:  2007-10-13       Impact factor: 3.853

9.  Premature conclusions in diagnostic reasoning.

Authors:  A E Voytovich; R M Rippey; A Suffredini
Journal:  J Med Educ       Date:  1985-04

10.  A comparison of current measures of the accuracy of feeling-of-knowing predictions.

Authors:  T O Nelson
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1984-01       Impact factor: 17.737

  10 in total
  3 in total

1.  METACOGNITIVE SCAFFOLDS IMPROVE SELF-JUDGMENTS OF ACCURACY IN A MEDICAL INTELLIGENT TUTORING SYSTEM.

Authors:  Reza Feyzi-Behnagh; Roger Azevedo; Elizabeth Legowski; Kayse Reitmeyer; Eugene Tseytlin; Rebecca S Crowley
Journal:  Instr Sci       Date:  2014-03

2.  Automated detection of heuristics and biases among pathologists in a computer-based system.

Authors:  Rebecca S Crowley; Elizabeth Legowski; Olga Medvedeva; Kayse Reitmeyer; Eugene Tseytlin; Melissa Castine; Drazen Jukic; Claudia Mello-Thoms
Journal:  Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract       Date:  2012-05-23       Impact factor: 3.853

3.  Efficacy of adaptive e-learning for health professionals and students: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Guillaume Fontaine; Sylvie Cossette; Marc-André Maheu-Cadotte; Tanya Mailhot; Marie-France Deschênes; Gabrielle Mathieu-Dupuis; José Côté; Marie-Pierre Gagnon; Veronique Dubé
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-08-28       Impact factor: 2.692

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.