Literature DB >> 19434039

The effect of July admission in the process of care of patients with acute cardiovascular conditions.

Santiago Garcia1, Mariana Canoniero, Larry Young.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Little information is available to measure the impact of new trainees in the process of care and outcomes of patients with acute cardiovascular conditions. The objective of this investigation is to assess whether physicians' experience has an impact on the quality of health care delivery.
METHODS: Two cohorts of hospitalized patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) (n = 764) and decompensated heart failure (HF) (n = 590) were included in this study. Utilization of life-saving medications, diagnostic and therapeutic procedures, and in-hospital outcomes were compared between patients admitted during July-September (J-S) vs. October-June (O-J). Independent predictors of optimal medical management (OMM) were determined by logistic regression analysis.
RESULTS: During O-J, 573 (75%) patients were admitted with an ACS and 516 (84%) with decompensated HF. Among patients with acute coronary syndromes, utilization of beta blockers, aspirin, and statins was similar in the two groups (all P NS). In multivariate analysis, the only independent predictor of optimal medical management was the performance of coronary angioplasty (OR = 1.5, 95% CI = 1.05-2.14, P = 0.02). Among patients with decompensated HF, no difference was found in utilization of beta blockers, ACEI/ARB, length of stay and in-hospital mortality. In multivariate analysis, age >65, atrial fibrillation, admission during J-S, and disease severity were all independent predictors of not receiving optimal medical management (all P < 0.05). These differences were explained exclusively on the basis of EF measurement and not on different utilization rates of pharmacological therapy.
CONCLUSIONS: Our results do not support the concept of a "July phenomenon" in patients presenting with acute cardiovascular conditions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19434039     DOI: 10.1097/SMJ.0b013e3181a2f8ca

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  South Med J        ISSN: 0038-4348            Impact factor:   0.954


  6 in total

1.  A "reverse july effect": association between timing of admission, medical team workload, and 30-day readmission rate.

Authors:  Yelena Averbukh; William Southern
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2014-03

2.  Is there any evidence of a "July effect" in patients undergoing major cancer surgery?

Authors:  Praful Ravi; Vincent Q Trinh; Maxine Sun; Jesse Sammon; Shyam Sukumar; Mai-Kim Gervais; Shahrokh F Shariat; Simon P Kim; Keith J Kowalczyk; Jim C Hu; Mani Menon; Pierre I Karakiewicz; Quoc-Dien Trinh
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 2.089

3.  Rates of Adverse Events in Hospitalized Patients After Summer-Time Resident Changeover in the United States: Is There a July Effect?

Authors:  Mark L Metersky; Noel Eldridge; Yun Wang; Sheila Eckenrode; Deron Galusha; Lisa Jaser; Jasie Mathew; Steven Angus; Robert Nardino
Journal:  J Patient Saf       Date:  2022-04-01       Impact factor: 2.243

Review 4.  A systematic review of the effects of residency training on patient outcomes.

Authors:  Renée M van der Leeuw; Kiki M J M H Lombarts; Onyebuchi A Arah; Maas Jan Heineman
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2012-06-28       Impact factor: 8.775

5.  The July Effect: is emergency department length of stay greater at the beginning of the hospital academic year?

Authors:  Christine Riguzzi; H Gene Hern; Farnaz Vahidnia; Andrew Herring; Harrison Alter
Journal:  West J Emerg Med       Date:  2014-02

6.  Impact of Resident Rotations on Critically Ill Patient Outcomes: Results of a French Multicenter Observational Study.

Authors:  Benjamin G Chousterman; Romain Pirracchio; Bertrand Guidet; Philippe Aegerter; Hervé Mentec
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-09-14       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.