Literature DB >> 19433754

Percutaneous device closure of patent foramen ovale for secondary stroke prevention: a call for completion of randomized clinical trials: a science advisory from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association and the American College of Cardiology Foundation.

Patrick T O'Gara, Steven R Messe, E Murat Tuzcu, Gloria Catha, John C Ring.   

Abstract

The optimal therapy for prevention of recurrent stroke or transient ischemic attack in patients with cryptogenic stroke and patent foramen ovale has not been defined. Although numerous observational studies have suggested a strong association between patent foramen ovale and cryptogenic stroke, a causal relationship has not been convincingly established for the majority of affected patients. Treatment choices include medical therapy with antiplatelet agents or vitamin K antagonists, percutaneous device closure, or open surgical repair. Whereas suture closure of an incidental patent foramen ovale is performed routinely during the course of an operation undertaken for another indication, primary surgical repair is rarely advocated in the current era. The choice between medical therapy and percutaneous device closure has been the subject of intense debate over the past several years, albeit one that has not been adequately informed by randomized, prospective clinical trial data to permit an objective comparison of the relative safety and efficacy of these respective approaches. Enrollment in clinical trials has lagged considerably despite frequent calls for participation from the US Food and Drug Administration and major professional societies. Completion and peer review of ongoing trials are critical steps to establish an evidence base from which clinicians can make informed decisions regarding the best therapy for individual patients. The present advisory strongly encourages all clinicians involved in the care of appropriate patients with cryptogenic stroke and patent foramen ovale--cardiologists, neurologists, internists, radiologists, and surgeons--to consider referral for enrollment in these landmark trials to expedite their completion and help resolve the uncertainty regarding optimal care for this condition.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19433754     DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.192272

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  21 in total

1.  Patent foramen ovale and stroke: Should PFOs be closed in otherwise cryptogenic stroke?

Authors:  David A Carpenter; Andria L Ford; Jin-Moo Lee
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 5.113

Review 2.  Atrial septum defect closure device in a beating heart, from the perspective of a researcher in artificial organs.

Authors:  Yasuko Tomizawa
Journal:  J Artif Organs       Date:  2012-06-23       Impact factor: 1.731

3.  Percutaneous closure of patent foramen ovale: a near-perfect treatment ruined by careful study?

Authors:  David M Kent; Georgios D Kitsios
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes       Date:  2012-05

4.  Congenital heart conditions: Patent foramen ovale closure--not all devices are equal.

Authors:  Bernhard Meier
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2013-09-03       Impact factor: 32.419

5.  A 41-year-old man with new headache and altered mental status.

Authors:  Erik C B Johnson; Timothy W West; Nerissa U Ko; Jonathan B Strober
Journal:  Neurohospitalist       Date:  2011-01

Review 6.  [Patent foramen ovale-intervention or pharmaceutical treatment].

Authors:  C Liebetrau; C W Hamm
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 0.743

7.  PFO and ASD Closure in Adulthood: Where Do We Stand?

Authors:  Asad A Rizvi; Ronan Margey
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2014-04

Review 8.  Patent foramen ovale closure and medical treatments for secondary stroke prevention: a systematic review of observational and randomized evidence.

Authors:  Georgios D Kitsios; Issa J Dahabreh; Abd Moain Abu Dabrh; David E Thaler; David M Kent
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2011-12-15       Impact factor: 7.914

Review 9.  Rethinking trial strategies for stroke and patent foramen ovale.

Authors:  David E Thaler; David M Kent
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurol       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 5.710

10.  Patent foramen ovale closure.

Authors:  Zahid Amin
Journal:  Ann Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2010-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.