Literature DB >> 19433161

Absolute vs relative improvements in congenital diaphragmatic hernia survival: what happened to "hidden mortality".

V Kandice Mah1, Mohammed Zamakhshary, Doug Y Mah, Brian Cameron, Juan Bass, Desmond Bohn, Leslie Scott, Sharifa Himidan, Mark Walker, Peter C W Kim.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of this study is to determine if there has been a true, absolute, or apparent relative increase in congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) survival for the last 2 decades.
METHOD: All neonatal Bochdalek CDH patients admitted to an Ontario pediatric surgical hospital during the period when significant improvements in CDH survival was reported (from January 1, 1992, to December 31, 1999) were analyzed. Patient characteristics were assessed for CDH population homogeneity and differences between institutional and vital statistics-based population survival outcomes. SAS 9.1 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC) was used for analysis. RESULT: Of 198 cohorts, demographic parameters including birth weight, gestational age, Apgar scores, sex, and associated congenital anomalies did not change significantly. Preoperative survival was 149 (75.2%) of 198, whereas postoperative survival was 133 (89.3%) of 149, and overall institutional survival was 133 (67.2%) of 198. Comparison of institution and population-based mortality (n = 65 vs 96) during the period yielded 32% of CDH deaths unaccounted for by institutions. Yearly analysis of hidden mortality consistently showed a significantly lower mortality in institution-based reporting than population.
CONCLUSION: A hidden mortality exists for institutionally reported CDH survival rates. Careful interpretation of research findings and more comprehensive population-based tools are needed for reliable counseling and evaluation of current and future treatments.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19433161     DOI: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2009.01.046

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pediatr Surg        ISSN: 0022-3468            Impact factor:   2.545


  14 in total

1.  Population-Based Validation of a Clinical Prediction Model for Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernias.

Authors:  Daniel P Bent; Jason Nelson; David M Kent; Howard C Jen
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  2018-06-25       Impact factor: 4.406

Review 2.  Congenital diaphragmatic hernia: a scientometric analysis of the global research activity and collaborative networks.

Authors:  Florian Friedmacher; Mikko P Pakarinen; Risto J Rintala
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2018-07-17       Impact factor: 1.827

3.  A family-based paradigm to identify candidate chromosomal regions for isolated congenital diaphragmatic hernia.

Authors:  Cammon B Arrington; Steven B Bleyl; Nori Matsunami; Neil E Bowles; Tami I Leppert; Bradley L Demarest; Karen Osborne; Bradley A Yoder; Janice L Byrne; Joshua D Schiffman; Donald M Null; Robert DiGeronimo; Michael Rollins; Roger Faix; Jessica Comstock; Nicola J Camp; Mark F Leppert; H Joseph Yost; Luca Brunelli
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2012-11-19       Impact factor: 2.802

4.  Congenital diaphragmatic hernia sacs: prenatal imaging and associated postnatal outcomes.

Authors:  Edward R Oliver; Suzanne E DeBari; Samantha E Adams; Ryne A Didier; Steven C Horii; Teresa Victoria; Holly L Hedrick; N Scott Adzick; Lori J Howell; Julie S Moldenhauer; Beverly G Coleman
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2019-01-11

5.  Maternal periconceptional exposure to cigarette smoking and alcohol consumption and congenital diaphragmatic hernia.

Authors:  Kristin M Caspers; Cristiana Oltean; Paul A Romitti; Lixian Sun; Barbara R Pober; Sonja A Rasmussen; Wei Yang; Charlotte Druschel
Journal:  Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol       Date:  2010-09-14

6.  Incidence of congenital diaphragmatic hernia in Olmsted County, Minnesota: a population-based study.

Authors:  Jason M Woodbury; Katarina Bojanić; Ruža Grizelj; Alexandre N Cavalcante; Vinay K Donempudi; Toby N Weingarten; Darrell R Schroeder; Juraj Sprung
Journal:  J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med       Date:  2017-10-29

Review 7.  Prenatal intervention for the management of congenital diaphragmatic hernia.

Authors:  Mariatu A Verla; Candace C Style; Oluyinka O Olutoye
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2018-04-30       Impact factor: 1.827

8.  Impact of congenital diaphragmatic hernia on diaphragm muscle function in neonatal rats.

Authors:  Matthew J Fogarty; Elizabeth Ann L Enninga; Eniola R Ibirogba; Rodrigo Ruano; Gary C Sieck
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2021-01-28

9.  Prevalence and mortality in children with congenital diaphragmatic hernia: a multicountry study.

Authors:  Maria D Politis; Eva Bermejo-Sánchez; Mark A Canfield; Paolo Contiero; Janet D Cragan; Saeed Dastgiri; Hermien E K de Walle; Marcia L Feldkamp; Amy Nance; Boris Groisman; Miriam Gatt; Adriana Benavides-Lara; Paula Hurtado-Villa; Kärin Kallén; Danielle Landau; Nathalie Lelong; Jorge Lopez-Camelo; Laura Martinez; Margery Morgan; Osvaldo M Mutchinick; Anna Pierini; Anke Rissmann; Antonin Šípek; Elena Szabova; Wladimir Wertelecki; Ignacio Zarante; Marian K Bakker; Vijaya Kancherla; Pierpaolo Mastroiacovo; Wendy N Nembhard
Journal:  Ann Epidemiol       Date:  2020-11-27       Impact factor: 3.797

10.  Is the time necessary to obtain preoperative stabilization a predictive index of outcome in neonatal congenital diaphragmatic hernia?

Authors:  Andrea Gentili; Rosina De Rose; Elisa Iannella; Maria Letizia Bacchi Reggiani; Mario Lima; Simonetta Baroncini
Journal:  Int J Pediatr       Date:  2012-01-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.