| Literature DB >> 19432828 |
Sophie E Moore1, A M Prentice, Y Wagatsuma, A J C Fulford, A C Collinson, R Raqib, M Vahter, L A Persson, S E Arifeen.
Abstract
AIM: The aim was to assess the impact of nutritional status and environmental exposures on infant thymic development in the rural Matlab region of Bangladesh.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2009 PMID: 19432828 PMCID: PMC2721967 DOI: 10.1111/j.1651-2227.2009.01292.x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Acta Paediatr ISSN: 0803-5253 Impact factor: 2.299
Infant characteristics at birth and at 8, 24 and 52 weeks of age
| Males | Females | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | Mean | SD | Mean | SD | |
| Birth | |||||
| Weight (kg) | 1168 | 2.79 | 0.39 | 2.70 | 0.38 |
| Length (cm) | 1168 | 48.06 | 2.01 | 47.31 | 2.01 |
| Gestational age (week) | 1148 | 38.97 | 2.13 | 39.13 | 2.06 |
| Week 8 | |||||
| Weight (kg) | 1650 | 4.77 | 0.62 | 4.41 | 0.57 |
| Length (cm) | 1637 | 55.7 | 2.19 | 54.5 | 2.13 |
| WHZ | 1635 | −0.05 | 1.25 | −0.09 | 1.07 |
| Week 24 | |||||
| Weight (kg) | 1662 | 7.02 | 0.87 | 6.45 | 0.81 |
| Length (cm) | 1655 | 64.5 | 2.30 | 62.7 | 2.21 |
| WHZ | 1652 | −0.28 | 1.15 | −0.21 | 0.98 |
| Week 52 | |||||
| Weight (kg) | 2881 | 8.30 | 1.08 | 7.66 | 1.00 |
| Length (cm) | 2860 | 71.7 | 2.59 | 69.9 | 2.53 |
| WHZ | 2860 | −0.76 | 1.11 | −0.73 | 1.05 |
Data are for infants for whom a measure of thymic index plus the relevant anthropometric measure is available at each time point.
WHZ = weight-for-height standard deviation score using WHO reference data.
Figure 1Mean thymic index (open circles) and thymic index expressed in relation to body weight (closed circles) by age. Data are expressed as means and 95% CIs.
Figure 2Relative size of thymus variation with time of year plotted at birth and at 8, 24 and 52 weeks of age. The curves are the seasonal component of equation (1) fitted by multiple regression. They show the mean TI difference from the overall average at different times of the year. Post-natally, the thymus is largest in the first half of the year and smallest in the second half of the year. The picture is rather different at birth where there appeared to be two peaks: at the turn of the year and at mid-year. The difference between the patterns at the different post-natal ages is not significant but these do differ significantly from the pattern at birth.
Correlation matrix for adjusted thymic index (adjusted for season, sex and infant size)
| Birth | Week 8 | Week 24 | Week 52 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Birth | 1.000 | |||
| Week 8 | 0.340 | 1.000 | ||
| Week 24 | 0.152 | 0.284 | 1.000 | |
| Week 52 | 0.177 | 0.216 | 0.207 | 1.000 |
Data tabulated are correlation coefficients, their 95% confidence intervals (based on Fisher's transformation) and sample size at each time point. All correlations are significant at the p < 0.0001 level.
Association between birth weight and thymic index at different time points
| Time point | β-Coefficient | SE | p-value | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Birth | 5.996 | 0.856 | ≤0.0001 | 4.316, 7.676 |
| Week 8 | 2.840 | 1.010 | 0.005 | 0.859, 4.821 |
| Week 24 | 0.579 | 0.841 | 0.491 | −1.071, 2.228 |
| Week 52 | 0.556 | 0.681 | 0.415 | −0.781, 1.892 |
Data are derived from regression analysis adjusting for sex, season and infant length at the time of measurement. The β-coefficient gives the increase in the thymic index at different ages associated with each kg increase in birthweight. This association clearly fades rapidly in the first year of life.