Literature DB >> 19432789

The analysis of biodiversity using rank abundance distributions.

Scott D Foster1, Piers K Dunstan.   

Abstract

Biodiversity is an important topic of ecological research. A common form of data collected to investigate patterns of biodiversity is the number of individuals of each species at a series of locations. These data contain information on the number of individuals (abundance), the number of species (richness), and the relative proportion of each species within the sampled assemblage (evenness). If there are enough sampled locations across an environmental gradient then the data should contain information on how these three attributes of biodiversity change over gradients. We show that the rank abundance distribution (RAD) representation of the data provides a convenient method for quantifying these three attributes constituting biodiversity. We present a statistical framework for modeling RADs and allow their multivariate distribution to vary according to environmental gradients. The method relies on three models: a negative binomial model, a truncated negative binomial model, and a novel model based on a modified Dirichlet-multinomial that allows for a particular type of heterogeneity observed in RAD data. The method is motivated by, and applied to, a large-scale marine survey off the coast of Western Australia, Australia. It provides a rich description of biodiversity and how it changes with environmental conditions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19432789     DOI: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2009.01263.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biometrics        ISSN: 0006-341X            Impact factor:   2.571


  8 in total

1.  Is there an ecological basis for species abundance distributions?

Authors:  Jian D L Yen; James R Thomson; Ralph Mac Nally
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2012-09-22       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 2.  Marine biodiversity in the Australian region.

Authors:  Alan J Butler; Tony Rees; Pam Beesley; Nicholas J Bax
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-08-02       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Characterising and predicting benthic biodiversity for conservation planning in deepwater environments.

Authors:  Piers K Dunstan; Franziska Althaus; Alan Williams; Nicholas J Bax
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-05-11       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Effects of the diet on the microbiota of the red palm weevil (Coleoptera: Dryophthoridae).

Authors:  Matteo Montagna; Bessem Chouaia; Giuseppe Mazza; Erica Maria Prosdocimi; Elena Crotti; Valeria Mereghetti; Violetta Vacchini; Annamaria Giorgi; Alessio De Biase; Santi Longo; Rita Cervo; Giuseppe Carlo Lozzia; Alberto Alma; Claudio Bandi; Daniele Daffonchio
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-01-30       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  454-pyrosequencing: a molecular battiscope for freshwater viral ecology.

Authors:  David J Rooks; Darren L Smith; James E McDonald; Martin J Woodward; Alan J McCarthy; Heather E Allison
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2010-07-21       Impact factor: 4.096

6.  Quantitative Comparison of Abundance Structures of Generalized Communities: From B-Cell Receptor Repertoires to Microbiomes.

Authors:  Mohammadkarim Saeedghalati; Farnoush Farahpour; Bettina Budeus; Anja Lange; Astrid M Westendorf; Marc Seifert; Ralf Küppers; Daniel Hoffmann
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2017-01-23       Impact factor: 4.475

7.  Changes in the fluorescence intensity, degradability, and aromaticity of organic carbon in ammonium and phenanthrene-polluted aquatic ecosystems.

Authors:  Zixia Qiao; Sihai Hu; Yaoguo Wu; Ran Sun; Xiaoyan Liu; Jiangwei Chan
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2021-01-04       Impact factor: 3.361

8.  Application of a Bayesian nonparametric model to derive toxicity estimates based on the response of Antarctic microbial communities to fuel-contaminated soil.

Authors:  Julyan Arbel; Catherine K King; Ben Raymond; Tristrom Winsley; Kerrie L Mengersen
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2015-06-13       Impact factor: 2.912

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.