Literature DB >> 19432667

Initial multi-centre observations upon the effect of a new Topical Negative Pressure device upon patient and clinician experience and the treatment of wounds.

Wojciech Witkowski1, Arkadiusz Jawien, Wojciech Witkiewicz, Bartlomiej Zon.   

Abstract

Topical Negative Pressure (TNP) has become an accepted intervention in wound healing with a growing body of scientific literature supporting the effectiveness of TNP across a wide variety of wound aetiologies. The range of TNP devices has also increased with perhaps the primary distinction being between those TNP devices that employ gauze or foam as a wound dressing. This study reports preliminary multi-centre observations upon the use of a new gauze based TNP device in the treatment of wounds. Across 3 study centres twenty-nine subjects were recruited to the study with 8 presenting with leg ulcers, 8 with pressure ulcers, 12 with acute or surgical wounds and 1 with a non-healing burn injury. Wounds were then treated with the new TNP therapy for a maximum of 17 days (range 2-17 days). There appeared to be a trend for subjects with leg ulcers to be treated for longer (mean duration 12.9 days) compared to subjects with pressure ulcers (mean duration 6.5 days) or those with surgical wounds (mean duration 8.2 days). Given the relatively short duration of the TNP therapy no wound completely healed although 22/29 (75.9%) showed reductions in surface area per day of treatment with all but 1 pressure ulcer and 1 leg ulcer responding positively to treatment. While not an RCT, this and similar cohort studies may be central to the future selection of TNP devices given the increasing importance of the role of the user interface to reduce the likelihood of incorrect use and sub-optimal outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19432667      PMCID: PMC7951371          DOI: 10.1111/j.1742-481X.2009.00586.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Wound J        ISSN: 1742-4801            Impact factor:   3.315


  4 in total

Review 1.  Topical negative pressure for treating chronic wounds.

Authors:  D Evans; L Land
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2001

Review 2.  Negative pressure wound therapy: a vacuum of evidence?

Authors:  Sven Gregor; Marc Maegele; Stefan Sauerland; Jan F Krahn; Frank Peinemann; Stefan Lange
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2008-02

Review 3.  Negative-pressure wound therapy: a snapshot of the evidence.

Authors:  Derick A Mendonca; Remo Papini; Patricia E Price
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 3.315

4.  Resource utilization and economic costs of care based on a randomized trial of vacuum-assisted closure therapy in the treatment of diabetic foot wounds.

Authors:  Jan Apelqvist; David G Armstrong; Lawrence A Lavery; Andrew J M Boulton
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2008-03-26       Impact factor: 2.565

  4 in total
  3 in total

1.  Effect of vacuum sealing drainage on the expression of VEGF and miRNA-17-5p in seawater-immersed blast-injury wounds.

Authors:  Fen Yang; Bing Shi; Ling Cao
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2017-01-18       Impact factor: 2.447

2.  Role of negative pressure wound therapy in healing of diabetic foot ulcers.

Authors:  Prabhdeep Singh Nain; Sanjeev K Uppal; Ramneesh Garg; Kuljyot Bajaj; Shirin Garg
Journal:  J Surg Tech Case Rep       Date:  2011-01

3.  Recombinant human epidermal growth factor combined with vacuum sealing drainage for wound healing in Bama pigs.

Authors:  Shuai Wei; Wei Wang; Li Li; Hao-Ye Meng; Chun-Zhen Feng; Yu-Ying Dong; Xi-Chi Fang; Qi-Qiang Dong; Wen Jiang; Hai-Li Xin; Zhan-Zhen Li; Xin Wang
Journal:  Mil Med Res       Date:  2021-03-09
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.