Literature DB >> 19432575

Invasive cervical cancer audit: a relative increase in interval cancers while coverage increased and incidence declined.

A Herbert1, M Gregory, S S Gupta, N Singh.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine screening histories of women with invasive cervical cancer in a 12-year period during the introduction of organised screening to assess its effectiveness. STUDY
DESIGN: Screening histories were classified into six categories: no cytology record (1), previous cytology more than 5 years before diagnosis (2) and previous cytology within 5 years of diagnosis (3-6). Categories 3-6 were described as interval cancers and comprised previous negative cytology (3), previous repeats for low-grade cytology (4), previous recommendations for investigation (5) and previous treatment (6).
SETTING: Southampton and South West Hampshire (SSWH). POPULATION: Women resident in SSWH registered with invasive cervical carcinoma between 1985 and 1996.
METHODS: Data were held for analysis on an anonymous spreadsheet. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Association of screening history categories with 3-year time period, age group, type and stage of cancer and route to diagnosis; incidence per 100,000 women aged 25-64 years screened and not screened within 5 years in 1991-93 and 1994-96.
RESULTS: Interval cancers increased as a proportion of all cancers from 31.5% in 1985-87 to 48.6% in 1994-96 (P= 0.002) and showed a peak in 1991-93. Their incidence decreased from 20.1 to 10.9 per 100 000 eligible women aged 25-64 years screened within 5 years (P= 0.008) between 1991-93 and 1994-96, while incidence in women not screened within 5 years was unchanged (44.2 and 40.4). Factors other than previous negative smears were recorded in 50.9% of interval cancers. Interval cancers were more likely to be low stage, screen detected and were diagnosed in younger women (P < 0.00001).
CONCLUSIONS: Interval cancers should be assessed as a proportion of eligible women screened within the same period of time and not as a proportion of all cancers. This audit demonstrates the importance of accurate cytology, appropriate follow up, prompt investigation and effective treatment of high-grade precancerous lesions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19432575     DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2008.01990.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJOG        ISSN: 1470-0328            Impact factor:   6.531


  3 in total

1.  Underscreened Women Remain Overrepresented in the Pool of Cervical Cancer Cases in Spain: A Need to Rethink the Screening Interventions.

Authors:  Raquel Ibáñez; María Alejo; Neus Combalia; Xavier Tarroch; Josefina Autonell; Laia Codina; Montserrat Culubret; Francesc Xavier Bosch; Silvia de Sanjosé
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-06-09       Impact factor: 3.411

2.  [Evaluation of mortality after the analysis of the screening history in women diagnosed with infiltrating cervical cancer].

Authors:  Marta Castillo; Aurora Astudillo; Omar Clavero; Julio Velasco; Raquel Ibáñez; Silvia de Sanjosé
Journal:  Aten Primaria       Date:  2017-06-16       Impact factor: 1.137

3.  Poor Cervical Cancer Screening Attendance and False Negatives. A Call for Organized Screening.

Authors:  Marta Castillo; Aurora Astudillo; Omar Clavero; Julio Velasco; Raquel Ibáñez; Silvia de Sanjosé
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-08-22       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.