Literature DB >> 19430923

Home dialysis as a first option: a new paradigm.

Dimitrios G Oreopoulos1, Elias Thodis, Ploumis Passadakis, Vassilis Vargemezis.   

Abstract

Traditionally, the initial choice of dialysis for patients with end stage renal disease (ESRD) has been in-center hemodialysis (HD) or peritoneal dialysis (PD). Usually, the choice between these (PD vs. HD) has been based on the characteristics of the dialysis techniques. Obviously the choice of peritoneal dialysis implied dialysis at home, but its geographic location has been only a secondary consideration. Peritoneal dialysis has evolved as a dependable mode that gives good outcomes. This method has become more attractive with the option of overnight cyclers and the recent use of home helpers in some jurisdictions. At the same time the interest in home hemodialysis was rekindled by reports of good outcomes with short daily or nocturnal hemodialysis. Home dialysis (PD or HD) offers high quality of treatment, a high degree of patient independence, and is financially attractive. Therefore, we propose a change in our approach to the choice of the initial form of dialysis for patients with ESRD. Instead of choosing between HD and PD we should present the new patients the advantage of dialysis at home and instead of asking them to choose between peritoneal dialysis or hemodialysis, they should be offered the option to choose between dialysis at home (PD or HD) or in-hospital. This paper will review the advantages of the home-based dialysis methods and the arguments for this simple but vital change in the process of choosing the method of dialysis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19430923     DOI: 10.1007/s11255-009-9575-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol        ISSN: 0301-1623            Impact factor:   2.370


  90 in total

1.  Quotidian dialysis: The London, Ontario experience.

Authors:  Christopher R Blagg
Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 8.860

2.  Quality of life and rehabilitation differences among four end-stage renal disease therapy groups.

Authors:  R G Simmons; C R Anderson; L K Abress
Journal:  Scand J Urol Nephrol Suppl       Date:  1990

3.  The Oxford-Manchester study of dialysis patients. Age, risk factors and treatment method in relation to quality of life.

Authors:  J Auer; R Gokal; J P Stout; V F Hillier; J Kincey; L G Simon; D O Oliver
Journal:  Scand J Urol Nephrol Suppl       Date:  1990

Review 4.  Daily hemodialysis: a systematic review.

Authors:  Rita S Suri; Gihad E Nesrallah; Rahul Mainra; Amit X Garg; Robert M Lindsay; Tom Greene; John T Daugirdas
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2005-11-16       Impact factor: 8.237

5.  Choice of treatment improves quality of life. A study on patients undergoing dialysis.

Authors:  E Szabo; H Moody; T Hamilton; C Ang; C Kovithavongs; C Kjellstrand
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1997-06-23

Review 6.  ESRD modality selection into the 21st century: the importance of non medical factors.

Authors:  A R Nissenson; S S Prichard; I K Cheng; R Gokal; M Kubota; R Maiorca; M C Riella; J Rottembourg; J H Stewart
Journal:  ASAIO J       Date:  1997 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.872

7.  Access to, and outcome of, renal transplantation according to treatment modality of end-stage renal disease in France.

Authors:  Ylana Chalem; Jean-Philippe Ryckelynck; Philippe Tuppin; Christian Verger; Sylvie Chauvé; Denis Glotz
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 10.612

8.  Attitudes of British Isles nephrologists towards dialysis modality selection: a questionnaire study.

Authors:  Sarbjit Vanita Jassal; Ganesh Krishna; Netar P Mallick; David C Mendelssohn
Journal:  Nephrol Dial Transplant       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 5.992

9.  Evaluation of hemodialysis adequacy using online Kt/V and single-pool variable-volume urea Kt/V.

Authors:  Alicja E Grzegorzewska; Wojciech Banachowicz
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2008-07-01       Impact factor: 2.370

10.  Alternative strategies to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of peritoneal dialysis and hemodialysis.

Authors:  Tapani Salonen; Tuomo Reina; Heikki Oksa; Pekka Rissanen; Amos Pasternack
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2007-02-27       Impact factor: 2.266

View more
  13 in total

1.  The home dialysis first paradigm: suitability and transitioning.

Authors:  Mark Benaroia; David C Mendelssohn
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2010-06-30       Impact factor: 2.370

2.  Screening for peripheral artery disease in dialysis patients: an opportunity for early disease detection and timely initiation of appropriate therapeutic measures.

Authors:  Kosmas I Paraskevas; Sotirios A Koupidis; Alexandros A Tzovaras; Achilleas Nikolaou; Dimitri P Mikhailidis
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2011-01-06       Impact factor: 2.370

3.  Peritoneal dialysis glossary 2009.

Authors:  Vassilios Liakopoulos; Ioannis Stefanidis; Nicholas V Dombros
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2009-09-17       Impact factor: 2.370

4.  No need for an "expiry date" in chronic peritoneal dialysis to prevent encapsulating peritoneal sclerosis.

Authors:  Guido Garosi; Dimitrios G Oreopoulos
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 2.370

5.  Conversion from conventional in-centre thrice-weekly haemodialysis to short daily home haemodialysis ameliorates uremia-associated clinical parameters.

Authors:  Johan M Lorenzen; Thomas Thum; Georg M Eisenbach; Hermann Haller; Jan T Kielstein
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2011-02-27       Impact factor: 2.370

6.  Incidence of end-stage renal disease in the elderly: a steadily rising global socioeconomic epidemic.

Authors:  Kosmas I Paraskevas; Nikolaos Bessias; Sotirios A Koupidis; Effie Tziviskou; Dimitri P Mikhailidis; Dimitrios G Oreopoulos
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2009-12-18       Impact factor: 2.370

7.  Dialysis modality choices among chronic kidney disease patients: identifying the gaps to support patients on home-based therapies.

Authors:  Ai-Hua Zhang; Joanne M Bargman; Charmaine E Lok; Eveline Porter; Maria Mendez; Dimitrios G Oreopoulos; Christopher T Chan
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2010-06-20       Impact factor: 2.370

8.  Burden on caregivers as perceived by hemodialysis patients in the Frequent Hemodialysis Network (FHN) trials.

Authors:  Rita S Suri; Brett Larive; Amit X Garg; Yoshio N Hall; Andreas Pierratos; Glenn M Chertow; Irina Gorodetskeya; Alan S Kliger
Journal:  Nephrol Dial Transplant       Date:  2011-03-18       Impact factor: 5.992

9.  Patient outcome in primary peritoneal dialysis patients versus those transferred from hemodialysis and transplantation.

Authors:  Iraj Najafi; Mostafa Hosseini; Shahnaz Atabac; Hushang Sanadgol; Nader Nouri Majelan; Shiva Seirafian; Massih Naghibi; Khadigeh Makhdoumi; Fereshteh Saddadi; Tayebeh Soleymanian
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2011-11-17       Impact factor: 2.370

10.  Development of a decision aid to inform patients' and families' renal replacement therapy selection decisions.

Authors:  Jessica M Ameling; Priscilla Auguste; Patti L Ephraim; LaPricia Lewis-Boyer; Nicole DePasquale; Raquel C Greer; Deidra C Crews; Neil R Powe; Hamid Rabb; L Ebony Boulware
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2012-12-01       Impact factor: 2.796

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.