| Literature DB >> 19430613 |
Rajesh Yadav1, Manjula Suri, Rashmi Mathur, Suman Jain.
Abstract
Bilateral lesions in the Ventromedial nucleus of hypothalamus (VMH) cause hyperphagia and a preference for high lipid, high carbohydrate diet. Reversible lesion by procaine microinfusion produces a decrease in serum glucose and immunoreactive insulin levels. In the present study the effect of procaine microinfusion on feeding behavior and taste preference was observed. 5 h and 24 h food intake, water intake and weekly body weight of the rats was measured. Three bottle preference test was used to study the diet preferences. The 24 h food intake was found to be significantly more on 1(st), 2(nd) and 3(rd) day (41 +/- 6.03, 38.83 +/- 6.17 and 33.66 +/- 5.88 g/day, respectively) of procaine injection. There was also a significant increase in food intake at 0.25 h (4.166 +/- 2.04 g) and 1 h (5 +/- 0 g) as compared to saline group (0 +/- 0 g at 0.25 h and 0.83 +/- 2.04 g at 1 h). Post procaine water intake and body weight for seven days was not statistically significantly when compared to pre-lesion values. In the three bottles preference test, after procaine microinfusion there was a significantly increased preference for 20% sucrose and 0.15% saccharin than quinine and citric acid. The results suggest that bilateral procainization of VMH produces a transient increase in food intake and enhance preference for sweet tasting substances.Entities:
Keywords: body weight; food intake; lesion; preference; water intake
Year: 2009 PMID: 19430613 PMCID: PMC2675015 DOI: 10.3164/jcbn.08-158
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Clin Biochem Nutr ISSN: 0912-0009 Impact factor: 3.114
Fig. 1Fig. 1 shows the site of cannula (marked by arrows) bilaterally in VMH at magnification 10X. The sections were stained using haemotoxylin-eosin. 3V = third ventricle.
Fig. 2Fig. 2 shows the effect of injecting procaine bilaterally into the VMH on the 24 h food intake (gm) (Mean ± SD, n = 7). P and S represents the time when procaine and saline respectively were injected into the VMH. A significant increase in the food intake was observed for three days following procaine injection.* indicates comparison between the postinjection and preinjection basal values.* represents p<0.05.
Table 1 shows the effect of bilateral procaine injection into the ventromedial nucleus of hypothalamus on the 5 h food intake in grams (Mean ± SD, n = 7).
| Time (h) | Food Intake (g) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Saline injection | Procaine injection | ||
| 0.25 | 0 ± 0 | 4.166 ± 2.04 | 0.015 |
| 1 | 0.83 ± 2.04 | 5 ± 0 | 0.015 |
| 2 | 0 ± 0 | 0.83 ± 2.04 | 0.69 |
| 3 | 0.83 ± 2.04 | 2.166 ± 3.48 | 0.58 |
| 4 | 3.33 ± 2.58 | 3 ± 3.46 | 0.93 |
| 5 | 1.66 ± 2.58 | 3.33 ± 2.58 | 0.39 |
The p values in the table refer to the comparison between the saline and procaine group at each time period. A statistically significant increase in the food intake was observed in the procaine injected group with respect to saline, at 0.25 h and 1 h of procaine injection. p<0.05 is statistically significant.
Fig. 3Fig. 3 shows the effect of injecting procaine bilaterally into the VMH on the 24 h water intake (ml) (Mean ± SD, n = 7). P and S represents the time when procaine and saline respectively were injected into the VMH. No statistically significant difference in the 24 h water intake was observed following procaine or saline injection.
Table 2 shows the effect of bilateral procaine injection into the ventromedial nucleus of hypothalamus on the 5 h water intake (Mean ± SD, n = 7).
| Time (h) | Water intake (ml) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Saline injection | Procaine injection | ||
| 0.25 | 1.66 ± 1.75 | 1.16 ± 0.75 | 0.93 |
| 1 | 1.50 ± 1.87 | 2.5 ± 2.25 | 0.48 |
| 2 | 1.16 ± 0.98 | 2.83 ± 2.13 | 0.18 |
| 3 | 1.66 ± 1.21 | 2.16 ± 2.04 | 0.589 |
| 4 | 1 ± 2 | 1.83 ± 2.56 | 0.589 |
| 5 | 0.66 ± 0.81 | 11.83 ± 2.13 | 0.31 |
The p values in the table refer to the comparison between the saline and procaine group at each time period. The p values show no change in the water intake in the procaine injected group with respect to saline. p<0.05 is statistically significant.
Fig. 4Fig. 4 shows the effect of injecting procaine bilaterally into the VMH on the change in body weight (gm) (Mean ± SD, n = 7) from the three basal preinjection values. No statistically significant difference in the body weight was observed following procaine or saline injection.
Table 3 shows the effect of bilateral procaine injection into the ventromedial nucleus of hypothalamus and the side preference on the intake of four taste solutions viz. 20% sucrose, 2 mM saccharine, 50 mM citric acid and 300 mM quinine hydrochloride (Mean ± SD, n = 7).
| Test solution ingested (ml) | Without procaine (left side) | With procaine (left side) | Without procaine (middle) | With procaine (midle) | Without procaine (right side) | With procaine (rightside) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sucrose (ml) | 12 ± 7.70 | 11 ± 6.34 | 0.716 | 2.25 ± 0.95 | 4 ± 2 | 0.141 | 7 ± 3.55 | 9.25 ± 5.49 | 0.71 |
| Saccharin (ml) | 8 ± 6.05 | 8.5 ± 3.41 | 1 | 4.25 ± 1.25 | 4.5 ± 1.29 | 0.317 | 17.5 ± 9.8 | 11.5 ± 4.72 | 0.27 |
| Citric acid (ml) | 6.00 ± 3.59 | 4.25 ± 1.5 | 0.58 | 7.5 ± 4.65 | 7.7 ± 3.86 | 0.85 | 7.5 ± 1.91 | 4.5 ± 0.58 | 0.66 |
| Quinine (ml) | 5.75 ± 1.25 | 5.0 ± 2.16 | 0.063 | 5.5 ± 0.577 | 4.5 ± 1.5 | 1 | 5 ± 0.81 | 3.25 ± 0.5 | 0.109 |
The p values in the table refer to the comparison between the without procaine and with procaine group in each taste solution. No statistically significant effect of procaine microinfusion was observed. p<0.05 is statistically significant.