Literature DB >> 19430404

Perception of burden experienced during diagnostic tests by melanoma patients with lymph node metastases.

Esther Bastiaannet1, Josette E Hoekstra-Weebers, Anne Brecht Francken, Piet L Jager, Eric J van der Jagt, Harald J Hoekstra.   

Abstract

Melanoma patients with lymph node metastases have to deal with diagnostic tests to exclude the presence of distant metastases; results of the tests could have major implications for their prognosis and treatment. There are, however, few studies concerning the patients' psychological issues and perception of diagnostic tests. The aim of this study was to describe the burden of diagnostic tests [radiograph, computed tomography (CT) and positron emission tomography (PET)] experienced by melanoma patients with lymph node metastases. Patients were asked to complete a questionnaire concerning satisfaction and burden experienced during the diagnostic tests. The levels of embarrassment, discomfort and anxiety for the different tests, as well as total scores for each burden were calculated. Logistic regression was used to examine factors associated with the degree of experienced burden. Fifty-nine of the 68 patients completed the questionnaire and the response rate was 87%. The overall mean scores on satisfaction and quality of life were high. More than half of the patients experienced no burden during PET, 65% no burden during computed tomography and 80% no burden during chest radiograph. Patients experienced significantly more discomfort during the PET scan than during the CT (P=0.003). Less burden was experienced (in univariate analysis) by patients who were more satisfied. The overall experienced burden by patients is low and should therefore not interfere with primary choice for a diagnostic test based on accuracy, costs and percentage of patients upstaged. Attention should be paid in explaining the procedure and answering questions of the patients to reduce burden.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19430404     DOI: 10.1097/CMR.0b013e32831993b7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Melanoma Res        ISSN: 0960-8931            Impact factor:   3.599


  4 in total

1.  A comparison of the psychological burden of PET/MRI and PET/CT scans and association to initial state anxiety and previous imaging experiences.

Authors:  R I Shortman; D Neriman; J Hoath; L Millner; R Endozo; G Azzopardi; C O'Meara; J Bomanji; A M Groves
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2015-06-19       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Anxiety in Cancer Patients during 18F-FDG PET/CT Low Dose: A Comparison of Anxiety Levels before and after Imaging Studies.

Authors:  Ana Grilo; Lina Vieira; Elisabete Carolino; Cátia Oliveira; Carolina Pacheco; Maria Castro; Juan Alonso
Journal:  Nurs Res Pract       Date:  2017-03-14

Review 3.  Scanxiety: a scoping review about scan-associated anxiety.

Authors:  Kim Tam Bui; Roger Liang; Belinda E Kiely; Chris Brown; Haryana M Dhillon; Prunella Blinman
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-05-26       Impact factor: 2.692

4.  Oncological Patient Anxiety in Imaging Studies: the PET/CT Example.

Authors:  Carla Abreu; Ana Grilo; Filipa Lucena; Elisabete Carolino
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 2.037

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.