Yi-Zhong Wang1, Sarah E Morale, Robert Cousins, Eileen E Birch. 1. Department of Ophthalmology, Retina Foundation of the Southwest, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas 75231, USA. yiwang@retinafoundation.org
Abstract
PURPOSE: Global visual integration is fundamental to shape and face recognition. Although the maturation of local visual function, such as resolution acuity, has been well documented, less is known about the changes in global visual function during development and with aging. METHODS: Two hundred thirty-six normal subjects, ranging in age from 0.25- to 78-years old, participated in the study. Global hyperacuity (detection threshold for radial deformation) was obtained from 300 eyes using either a computerized testing or a chart testing protocol and spatial forced choice (preferential looking for <2.6-year old, pointing for young children, or verbal response for older children and adults). Resolution acuity was also measured. The developmental courses for global hyperacuity and resolution acuity were fit to a 3-segment curve to capture the initial rapid development, followed by a period of stable, adult-level visual function and, finally, the decline in visual function with aging. RESULTS: Curve fitting revealed that global hyperacuity was 0.25 logMAR at 0.25 years of age, and improved rapidly to -0.56 logMAR at 5.4 years of age but did not reach the mean adult level (-0.86 logMAR) until 21 years of age. Global hyperacuity started to deteriorate from 55 years of age at the rate of 0.035 logMAR per decade. In comparison, resolution acuity reached 0.0 logMAR at 5 years of age, and reached the adult level of -0.1 logMAR at 11 years of age. Resolution acuity also started to decrease from 55 years of age at the rate of 0.058 logMAR per decade. CONCLUSIONS: Similar to vernier alignment acuity, global hyperacuity improves rapidly during infancy and early childhood but takes longer to reach the adult level than resolution acuity. The delayed maturation of global hyperacuity suggests that further development to refine neural circuitry at the cortical level takes place in the second decade of life.
PURPOSE: Global visual integration is fundamental to shape and face recognition. Although the maturation of local visual function, such as resolution acuity, has been well documented, less is known about the changes in global visual function during development and with aging. METHODS: Two hundred thirty-six normal subjects, ranging in age from 0.25- to 78-years old, participated in the study. Global hyperacuity (detection threshold for radial deformation) was obtained from 300 eyes using either a computerized testing or a chart testing protocol and spatial forced choice (preferential looking for <2.6-year old, pointing for young children, or verbal response for older children and adults). Resolution acuity was also measured. The developmental courses for global hyperacuity and resolution acuity were fit to a 3-segment curve to capture the initial rapid development, followed by a period of stable, adult-level visual function and, finally, the decline in visual function with aging. RESULTS: Curve fitting revealed that global hyperacuity was 0.25 logMAR at 0.25 years of age, and improved rapidly to -0.56 logMAR at 5.4 years of age but did not reach the mean adult level (-0.86 logMAR) until 21 years of age. Global hyperacuity started to deteriorate from 55 years of age at the rate of 0.035 logMAR per decade. In comparison, resolution acuity reached 0.0 logMAR at 5 years of age, and reached the adult level of -0.1 logMAR at 11 years of age. Resolution acuity also started to decrease from 55 years of age at the rate of 0.058 logMAR per decade. CONCLUSIONS: Similar to vernier alignment acuity, global hyperacuity improves rapidly during infancy and early childhood but takes longer to reach the adult level than resolution acuity. The delayed maturation of global hyperacuity suggests that further development to refine neural circuitry at the cortical level takes place in the second decade of life.
Authors: P S Moke; A H Turpin; R W Beck; J M Holmes; M X Repka; E E Birch; R W Hertle; R T Kraker; J M Miller; C A Johnson Journal: Am J Ophthalmol Date: 2001-12 Impact factor: 5.258
Authors: Alison Gunn; Elizabeth Cory; Janette Atkinson; Oliver Braddick; John Wattam-Bell; Andrea Guzzetta; Giovanni Cioni Journal: Neuroreport Date: 2002-05-07 Impact factor: 1.837
Authors: Terri L Lewis; Dave Ellemberg; Daphne Maurer; Melanie Dirks; Fran Wilkinson; Hugh R Wilson Journal: Perception Date: 2004 Impact factor: 1.490
Authors: Kerstin Bucher; Thomas Dietrich; Valentine L Marcar; Silvia Brem; Pascal Halder; Said Boujraf; Paul Summers; Daniel Brandeis; Ernst Martin; Thomas Loenneker Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2006-04-19 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Roy W Beck; Pamela S Moke; Andrew H Turpin; Frederick L Ferris; John Paul SanGiovanni; Chris A Johnson; Eileen E Birch; Danielle L Chandler; Terry A Cox; R Clifford Blair; Raymond T Kraker Journal: Am J Ophthalmol Date: 2003-02 Impact factor: 5.258
Authors: Dennis R Hoffman; Dianna K Hughbanks-Wheaton; Rand Spencer; Gary E Fish; N Shirlene Pearson; Yi-Zhong Wang; Martin Klein; Alison Takacs; Kirsten G Locke; David G Birch Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2015-10 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Noelia Pitrelli Vazquez; Simon P Harding; Heinrich Heimann; Gabriela Czanner; Paul C Knox Journal: PLoS One Date: 2018-11-08 Impact factor: 3.240