Literature DB >> 19430228

Outcomes of primary repair and primary anastomosis in war-related colon injuries.

Amy Vertrees1, Matthew Wakefield, Chris Pickett, Lauren Greer, Abralena Wilson, Sue Gillern, Jeffery Nelson, Jayson Aydelotte, Alexander Stojadinovic, Craig Shriver.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The role of primary repair (PR) of modern day war-related colon injuries remains controversial.
METHODS: Retrospective review of medical records of combat-wounded soldiers with colon injuries sustained during March 2003 to August 2006 was conducted. Injuries were analyzed according to location: right (n = 30), transverse (n = 13), and left (n = 24) sided colon injuries. Two-tailed Fisher's Exact or chi tests were used for statistical analysis.
RESULTS: Seventy-seven soldiers returned to Walter Reed Army Medical Center with colon injuries suffered during Operations Enduring Freedom and Iraqi Freedom. Twelve patients with minor colon injuries were excluded. The remaining 65 patients (mean age, 28 +/- 7 years) sustained 67 colon injuries from secondary blast (n = 38); gunshot (n = 27); motor vehicle crash (n = 1) and crush injury (n = 1). Patients arrived at Walter Reed Army Medical Center 5 days (range, 2-16 days) after injury and damage control operations (n = 27, 42%), and were hospitalized for a median of 22 days (range, 1-306 days). Follow-up averaged 311 days (median, 198 days). PR was attempted in right (n = 18, 60%), transverse (n = 11, 85%), and left (n = 9, 38%) sided colon injuries. Delayed definitive treatment of colon injuries occurred in 42% of patients. Failure of repair occurred in 16% of patients and was more likely with concomitant pancreatic, stomach, splenic, diaphragm, and renal injuries. Overall morbidity for ostomy closure after primary ostomy formation was 30%, but increased to 75% for ostomy closure after primary anastomotic or repair failure.
CONCLUSIONS: PR of war-related colon injuries can be performed safely in selected circumstances in the absence of concomitant organ injury. Delayed anastomosis can often be performed after damage control operations once the patient stabilizes. Ostomy closure complications are more likely after anastomotic failure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19430228     DOI: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31819ea3fc

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Trauma        ISSN: 0022-5282


  13 in total

Review 1.  Evidence-based management of colorectal trauma.

Authors:  Eric K Johnson; Scott R Steele
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2013-07-04       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  Injuries of myocardial cells and changes of myocardial enzymes after firearm wound-induced intestinal perforation in porcine abdomen.

Authors:  Hui-Chao Xue; Ze-Xin Li; Wei-Wei Zheng; Yun-Zhen Guo; De-Yuan Feng; Jiang-Wei Liu
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-02-15

3.  Safety of performing a delayed anastomosis during damage control laparotomy in patients with destructive colon injuries.

Authors:  Carlos A Ordoñez; Luis F Pino; Marisol Badiel; Alvaro I Sánchez; Jhon Loaiza; Leonardo Ballestas; Juan Carlos Puyana
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  2011-12

4.  Performance of primary repair on colon injuries sustained from low-versus high-energy projectiles.

Authors:  Ranko Lazovic; Nemanja Radojevic; Ivana Curovic
Journal:  J Forensic Leg Med       Date:  2016-01-19       Impact factor: 1.614

Review 5.  Historical and current trends in colon trauma.

Authors:  Marlin Wayne Causey; David E Rivadeneira; Scott R Steele
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2012-12

Review 6.  Management of Destructive Colon Injuries after Damage Control Surgery.

Authors:  Jad Chamieh; Priya Prakash; William J Symons
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2017-12-19

7.  Colonic injuries and the damage control abdomen: does management strategy matter?

Authors:  Patrick Georgoff; Paul Perales; Benjamin Laguna; Daniel Holena; Patrick Reilly; Carrie Sims
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2012-07-25       Impact factor: 2.192

8.  The management of colonic trauma in the damage control era.

Authors:  B Shazi; J L Bruce; G L Laing; B Sartorius; D L Clarke
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2016-09-23       Impact factor: 1.891

9.  Abdominal blast injuries: different patterns, severity, management, and prognosis according to the main mechanism of injury.

Authors:  F Turégano-Fuentes; D Pérez-Diaz; M Sanz-Sánchez; R Alfici; I Ashkenazi
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2014-04-04       Impact factor: 3.693

10.  Outcomes of Exploratory Laparotomy and Abdominal Infections Among Combat Casualties.

Authors:  Joseph D Bozzay; Patrick F Walker; David W Schechtman; Faraz Shaikh; Laveta Stewart; David R Tribble; Matthew J Bradley
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2020-08-29       Impact factor: 2.192

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.