Literature DB >> 19429909

The role of biological fertility in predicting family size.

M Joffe1, J Key, N Best, T K Jensen, N Keiding.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: It is plausible that a couple's ability to achieve the desired number of children is limited by biological fertility, especially if childbearing is postponed. Family size has declined and semen quality may have deteriorated in much of Europe, although studies have found an increase rather than a decrease in couple fertility.
METHODS: Using four high-quality European datasets, we took the reported time to pregnancy (TTP) as the predictor variable; births reported as following contraceptive failure were an additional category. The outcome variable was final or near-final family size. Potential confounders were maternal age when unprotected sex began prior to the first birth, and maternal smoking. Desired family size was available in only one of the datasets.
RESULTS: Couples with a TTP of at least 12 months tended to have smaller families, with odds ratios for the risk of not having a second child approximately 1.8, and for the risk of not having a third child approximately 1.6. Below 12 months no association was observed. Findings were generally consistent across datasets. There was also a more than 2-fold risk of not achieving the desired family size if TTP was 12 months or more for the first child.
CONCLUSIONS: Within the limits of the available data quality, family size appears to be predicted by biological fertility, even after adjustment for maternal age, if the woman was at least 20 years old when the couple's first attempt at conception started. The contribution of behavioural factors to this result also needs to be investigated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19429909     DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dep087

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod        ISSN: 0268-1161            Impact factor:   6.918


  6 in total

1.  Fatherhood and the risk of cardiovascular mortality in the NIH-AARP Diet and Health Study.

Authors:  Michael L Eisenberg; Yikyung Park; Albert R Hollenbeck; Larry I Lipshultz; Arthur Schatzkin; Mark J Pletcher
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2011-09-26       Impact factor: 6.918

Review 2.  Epidemiologic tools to study the influence of environmental factors on fecundity and pregnancy-related outcomes.

Authors:  Rémy Slama; Ferran Ballester; Maribel Casas; Sylvaine Cordier; Merete Eggesbø; Carmen Iniguez; Mark Nieuwenhuijsen; Claire Philippat; Sylvie Rey; Stéphanie Vandentorren; Martine Vrijheid
Journal:  Epidemiol Rev       Date:  2013-12-20       Impact factor: 6.222

3.  Socioeconomic variations in female fertility impairment: a study in a cohort of Portuguese mothers.

Authors:  Sofia Correia; Teresa Rodrigues; Henrique Barros
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2014-01-02       Impact factor: 2.692

4.  Attitudes towards family formation among men attending fertility counselling.

Authors:  R Sylvest; E Koert; K Birch Petersen; G M H Malling; F Hald; A Nyboe Andersen; L Schmidt
Journal:  Reprod Biomed Soc Online       Date:  2018-07-20

5.  Impact of genetic risk score on the association between male childlessness and cardiovascular disease and mortality.

Authors:  Angel Elenkov; Olle Melander; Peter M Nilsson; He Zhang; Aleksander Giwercman
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-09-17       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Access to mass media messages, and use of family planning in Nigeria: a spatio-demographic analysis from the 2013 DHS.

Authors:  Chukwuedozie K Ajaero; Clifford Odimegwu; Ijeoma D Ajaero; Chidiebere A Nwachukwu
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2016-05-24       Impact factor: 3.295

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.