Literature DB >> 19429585

Visual acuity and visually evoked responses in children with cerebral palsy: Gross Motor Function Classification Scale.

F Ghasia1, J Brunstom, L Tychsen.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Measurement of visual acuity can be difficult in children with cerebral palsy (CP). The purpose of this study was to determine the probability of obtaining quantitative (logMAR) visual acuities in CP children with different severities of motor dysfunction.
METHODS: An observational, cross-sectional design study was conducted in 76 children (mean age 5.9 years) who had CP severity graded using the Gross Motor Function Classification Scale (GMFCS). Visual testing was performed using optotypes, spatial-sweep (SSVEP) or flash (FVEP) visually evoked potentials.
RESULTS: LogMAR acuity was obtainable in 88% of CP children, using either optotypes or SSVEPs. The success rate decreased with increasing severity of GMFCS Levels 1-5; nevertheless, logMAR acuities were obtainable in more than one-half (56%) of children with the most severe disease: Level 5. Similar results were obtained for CP severity assessed using physiological-anatomical subtype (hemiplegic; diplegic; quadriplegic) rather than GMFCS. The mean logMAR acuity (0.37; 20/48) in the CP cohort as a whole was approximately 2 Snellen-equivalent lines worse than that recorded in age-matched, normal children (0.22; 20/33).
CONCLUSION: Quantitative visual acuities can be obtained in the majority of CP children, including those with severe motor dysfunction. Difficulties in testing CP children lead often to the misconception that the children have immeasurably low vision.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19429585     DOI: 10.1136/bjo.2008.156372

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0007-1161            Impact factor:   4.638


  8 in total

1.  Pattern visual evoked potentials for identifying malingering.

Authors:  I-Ting Sun; Jong-Jer Lee; Hsiu-Mei Huang; Hsi-Kung Kuo
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-01-25       Impact factor: 2.379

2.  A comparison of contrast sensitivity and sweep visual evoked potential (sVEP) acuity estimates in normal humans.

Authors:  William H Ridder
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-08-14       Impact factor: 2.379

3.  Characteristics of Pattern Visual Evoked Potential in Two Eyes with Varying Visual Acuity in One Eye and Forensic Application.

Authors:  Fu-Quan Jia; Yu-Guang Liang; Xin-Yuan Zhang; Fang-Liang Luo; Yan-He Xiong; Long-Long Cheng; Ji-Hui Liu
Journal:  Curr Med Sci       Date:  2018-04-30

4.  Comparing enfant and PowerDiva sweep visual evoked potential (sVEP) acuity estimates.

Authors:  William H Ridder; Bradley S Waite; Timothy F Melton
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-08-24       Impact factor: 2.379

5.  Visual evoked potential-based acuity assessment: overestimation in amblyopia.

Authors:  Yaroslava Wenner; Sven P Heinrich; Christina Beisse; Antje Fuchs; Michael Bach
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-03-13       Impact factor: 2.379

Review 6.  VEP estimation of visual acuity: a systematic review.

Authors:  Ruth Hamilton; Michael Bach; Sven P Heinrich; Michael B Hoffmann; J Vernon Odom; Daphne L McCulloch; Dorothy A Thompson
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-06-02       Impact factor: 2.379

7.  Correlations between color perception and motor function impairment in children with spastic cerebral palsy.

Authors:  Marcelo Fernandes Costa; Jaelsa Cunha Pereira
Journal:  Behav Brain Funct       Date:  2014-06-25       Impact factor: 3.759

Review 8.  Assessment of Human Visual Acuity Using Visual Evoked Potential: A Review.

Authors:  Xiaowei Zheng; Guanghua Xu; Kai Zhang; Renghao Liang; Wenqiang Yan; Peiyuan Tian; Yaguang Jia; Sicong Zhang; Chenghang Du
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2020-09-28       Impact factor: 3.576

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.