Literature DB >> 19429285

An interesting relationship between drug absorption and melting point.

Katherine A Chu1, Samuel H Yalkowsky.   

Abstract

The ability to predict the extent of passive intestinal drug absorption is very important for efficient lead candidate selection and development. Physicochemical-based absorption predictive models previously developed use solubility, partition coefficient and pK(a) as drug input parameters for intestinal absorption. Alternatively, this study looks at the relationship between melting point and passive transport for poorly soluble drugs. It is based entirely on the expression derived from the General Solubility Equation (GSE) that relates melting point to the product of intrinsic solubility and partition coefficient. Given that the melting point of a compound is one of the first and more reliable physical properties measured, it can be advantageously used as a guide in early drug discovery and development. This paper elucidates the interesting relationship between the melting point and dose to the fraction absorbed of poorly soluble drugs, i.e., class II and IV compounds in the Biopharmaceutics Classification System. The newly defined melting point based absorption potential (MPbAP) parameter is successful at distinguishing 90% of the 91 drugs considered being well absorbed (FA>0.5) or poorly absorbed. In general, lower melting compounds are more likely to be well absorbed than higher melting compounds for any given dose. The fraction absorbed for drugs with high melting temperatures is limited by the dose to a greater degree than it is for low melting compounds.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19429285     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2009.01.026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Pharm        ISSN: 0378-5173            Impact factor:   5.875


  7 in total

Review 1.  Humble beginnings with big goals: Small molecule soluble epoxide hydrolase inhibitors for treating CNS disorders.

Authors:  Sydney Zarriello; Julian P Tuazon; Sydney Corey; Samantha Schimmel; Mira Rajani; Anna Gorsky; Diego Incontri; Bruce D Hammock; Cesar V Borlongan
Journal:  Prog Neurobiol       Date:  2018-11-14       Impact factor: 11.685

2.  On the Thermodynamic Thermal Properties of Quercetin and Similar Pharmaceuticals.

Authors:  Costas Tsioptsias; Ioannis Tsivintzelis
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2022-10-06       Impact factor: 4.927

3.  Enantioselective Synthesis and Profiling of Potent, Nonlinear Analogues of Antimalarial Tetraoxanes E209 and N205.

Authors:  Christopher M Woodley; Gemma L Nixon; Nicoletta Basilico; Silvia Parapini; Weiqian David Hong; Stephen A Ward; Giancarlo A Biagini; Suet C Leung; Donatella Taramelli; Keiko Onuma; Takashi Hasebe; Paul M O'Neill
Journal:  ACS Med Chem Lett       Date:  2021-06-24       Impact factor: 4.632

4.  The development of models to predict melting and pyrolysis point data associated with several hundred thousand compounds mined from PATENTS.

Authors:  Igor V Tetko; Daniel M Lowe; Antony J Williams
Journal:  J Cheminform       Date:  2016-01-22       Impact factor: 5.514

5.  Chemometric Evaluation of THz Spectral Similarity for the Selection of Early Drug Candidates.

Authors:  Lukasz A Sterczewski; Kacper Nowak; Boguslaw Szlachetko; Michal P Grzelczak; Berenika Szczesniak-Siega; Stanislawa Plinska; Wieslaw Malinka; Edward F Plinski
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-11-06       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 6.  Transdermal Delivery of Chemotherapeutics: Strategies, Requirements, and Opportunities.

Authors:  Rabin Neupane; Sai H S Boddu; Mariam Sami Abou-Dahech; Rinda Devi Bachu; David Terrero; R Jayachandra Babu; Amit K Tiwari
Journal:  Pharmaceutics       Date:  2021-06-26       Impact factor: 6.321

7.  Crystal Structure, Solubility, and Pharmacokinetic Study on a Hesperetin Cocrystal with Piperine as Coformer.

Authors:  Yanjie Liu; Fan Yang; Xiuhua Zhao; Siying Wang; Qilei Yang; Xiaoxue Zhang
Journal:  Pharmaceutics       Date:  2022-01-01       Impact factor: 6.321

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.