Literature DB >> 19428971

Shift of attention to the body location of distracters is mediated by perceptual load in sustained somatosensory attention.

Julia Adler1, Claire-Marie Giabbiconi, Matthias M Müller.   

Abstract

We investigated the impact of task difficulty on neuronal facilitation of to-be-attended somatosensory vibrotactile stimuli and transient tactile distracters during sustained attention. In Experiment 1, we employed an easy detection task and in Experiment 2 a challenging discrimination task. Sustained attention was manipulated by presenting vibrotactile stimuli simultaneously to the index fingers of both hands for a period of 3s. These stimuli elicited the steady-state somatosensory evoked potential (SSSEP). Subjects attended to one body side and had to detect target-stimuli that were embedded in the ongoing vibratory streams. When subjects discriminated target-stimuli we found increased SSSEP amplitudes of the to-be-attended vibrotactile stream and greater N140 amplitudes of the somatosensory evoked potential (SEP). During stimulus detection no such facilitation of the SSSEP was found. Greater N140 amplitudes elicited by to-be-ignored distracters indicated that they pull attention to that body location under conditions of low load.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19428971     DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2009.02.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Psychol        ISSN: 0301-0511            Impact factor:   3.251


  8 in total

1.  Stability and distribution of steady-state somatosensory evoked potentials elicited by vibro-tactile stimulation.

Authors:  Christian Breitwieser; Vera Kaiser; Christa Neuper; Gernot R Müller-Putz
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2012-03-08       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  The impact of light fingertip touch on haptic cortical processing during a standing balance task.

Authors:  David A E Bolton; William E McIlroy; W Richard Staines; W Richard Staines
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-05-17       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Frequency tagging of steady-state evoked potentials to explore the crossmodal links in spatial attention between vision and touch.

Authors:  Elisabeth Colon; Valéry Legrain; Gan Huang; André Mouraux
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2015-08-29       Impact factor: 4.016

4.  Sustained spatial attention to vibrotactile stimulation in the flutter range: relevant brain regions and their interaction.

Authors:  Dominique Goltz; Burkhard Pleger; Sabrina D Thiel; Sabrina Thiel; Arno Villringer; Matthias M Müller
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-12-19       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  The Role of Transient Target Stimuli in a Steady-State Somatosensory Evoked Potential-Based Brain-Computer Interface Setup.

Authors:  Christoph Pokorny; Christian Breitwieser; Gernot R Müller-Putz
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2016-04-07       Impact factor: 4.677

6.  Absence of Evidence or Evidence of Absence? Commentary: Captured by the pain: Pain steady-state evoked potentials are not modulated by selective spatial attention.

Authors:  Elisabeth Colon; André Mouraux
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2016-06-14       Impact factor: 3.169

Review 7.  Steady-State Somatosensory Evoked Potential for Brain-Computer Interface-Present and Future.

Authors:  Sangtae Ahn; Kiwoong Kim; Sung Chan Jun
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2016-01-14       Impact factor: 3.169

8.  Individual Optimal Attentional Strategy in Motor Learning Tasks Characterized by Steady-State Somatosensory and Visual Evoked Potentials.

Authors:  Takeshi Sakurada; Masataka Yoshida; Kiyoshi Nagai
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2022-01-04       Impact factor: 3.169

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.