Literature DB >> 19428415

Complementary hemispheric asymmetries in object naming and recognition: a voxel-based correlational study.

K Acres1, K I Taylor, H E Moss, E A Stamatakis, L K Tyler.   

Abstract

Cognitive neuroscientific research proposes complementary hemispheric asymmetries in naming and recognising visual objects, with a left temporal lobe advantage for object naming and a right temporal lobe advantage for object recognition. Specifically, it has been proposed that the left inferior temporal lobe plays a mediational role linking conceptual information with word forms and vice versa, while the right inferior temporal lobe supports the retrieval of conceptual knowledge from visual input. To test these hypotheses, we administered four behavioural tasks to fifteen patients with temporal lobe brain damage, and correlated their behavioural scores with voxel-based measures of neuronal integrity (signal intensities) in whole-brain analyses. The behavioural paradigms included four tasks. Two were verbal tasks: (a) picture naming requiring the mapping of conceptual knowledge to word forms, (b) semantic categorisation of words requiring the reverse mapping of word forms to conceptual knowledge, and two were visual object tasks with no verbal component, both of which required the retrieval of conceptual information from visual objects, i.e., (c) visual object categorisation and (d) normal and chimera object decisions. Performance on the verbal tasks correlated with the neural integrity of partially overlapping left inferior and anterior temporal lobe regions, while performance on the object tasks correlated with the neural integrity of overlapping regions in right inferior and anterior temporal lobe. These findings support the notion of complementary hemispheric advantages for object naming and recognition, and further suggest that the classical language model emphasising posterior regions in the mapping between word forms and conceptual knowledge should be extended to include left inferior temporal lobe.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19428415     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.02.024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychologia        ISSN: 0028-3932            Impact factor:   3.139


  13 in total

1.  Addressing long-standing controversies in conceptual knowledge representation in the temporal pole: A cross-modal paradigm.

Authors:  Lora T Likova
Journal:  IS&T Int Symp Electron Imaging       Date:  2017

Review 2.  The Differential Contributions of Conceptual Representation Format and Language Structure to Levels of Semantic Abstraction Capacity.

Authors:  Guido Gainotti
Journal:  Neuropsychol Rev       Date:  2017-04-03       Impact factor: 7.444

3.  Damage to the anterior arcuate fasciculus predicts non-fluent speech production in aphasia.

Authors:  Julius Fridriksson; Dazhou Guo; Paul Fillmore; Audrey Holland; Chris Rorden
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2013-10-15       Impact factor: 13.501

4.  The Social Cerebellum: A Large-Scale Investigation of Functional and Structural Specificity and Connectivity.

Authors:  Athanasia Metoki; Yin Wang; Ingrid R Olson
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2022-02-19       Impact factor: 4.861

5.  The Roles of Left Versus Right Anterior Temporal Lobes in Conceptual Knowledge: An ALE Meta-analysis of 97 Functional Neuroimaging Studies.

Authors:  Grace E Rice; Matthew A Lambon Ralph; Paul Hoffman
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2015-03-13       Impact factor: 5.357

Review 6.  Graded specialization within and between the anterior temporal lobes.

Authors:  Grace E Rice; Paul Hoffman; Matthew A Lambon Ralph
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2015-10-26       Impact factor: 5.691

7.  Anterior Temporal Lobe Morphometry Predicts Categorization Ability.

Authors:  Béatrice Garcin; Marika Urbanski; Michel Thiebaut de Schotten; Richard Levy; Emmanuelle Volle
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2018-02-07       Impact factor: 3.169

8.  The left superior temporal gyrus is a shared substrate for auditory short-term memory and speech comprehension: evidence from 210 patients with stroke.

Authors:  Alexander P Leff; Thomas M Schofield; Jennifer T Crinion; Mohamed L Seghier; Alice Grogan; David W Green; Cathy J Price
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 13.501

Review 9.  Why are the right and left hemisphere conceptual representations different?

Authors:  Guido Gainotti
Journal:  Behav Neurol       Date:  2014-01-23       Impact factor: 3.342

10.  From percept to concept in the ventral temporal lobes: Graded hemispheric specialisation based on stimulus and task.

Authors:  Paul Hoffman; Matthew A Lambon Ralph
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2018-02-02       Impact factor: 4.644

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.