Literature DB >> 19428074

Postoperative PSA and PSA velocity identify presence of prostate cancer after various surgical interventions for benign prostatic hyperplasia.

Brian T Helfand1, Christopher B Anderson, Angela Fought, Dae Y Kim, Ashish Vyas, Kevin T McVary.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To determine whether prostate-specific antigen (PSA) values can distinguish those with prostate cancer (CaP) from those with histologic benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) only after surgical intervention. Prostatic adenoma inevitably remains after BPH surgery; therefore, patients remain at risk of developing CaP. Although the PSA level can be used for CaP screening in this population, it might be influenced by the efficacies of different BPH procedures.
METHODS: We performed a review of patients who had undergone transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP; n = 343), holmium laser resection of the prostate (HoLRP; n = 54), or open prostatectomy (OP; n = 68). The PSA and PSA velocity values were collected at regular intervals both pre- and postoperatively for all patients. Only patients with histologic BPH and those with incidental CaP who underwent a watchful waiting strategy were included.
RESULTS: The average preoperative PSA values were significantly different between the TURP, HoLRP, and OP groups. Only 1 patient had incidental CaP in the HoLRP group. No differences were present between the preoperative PSA values for patients with histologic BPH and those with incidental CaP undergoing a watchful waiting strategy (P > .05). However, the postoperative PSA values were increased in the patients with CaP (watchful waiting compared with the patient with BPH only (2.4 vs 1.7 ng/mL TURP and 4.1 vs 1.1 ng/mL OP). Similarly, patients with incidental CaP had a significantly elevated postoperative mean PSA velocity compared with patients without CaP (0.38 vs 0.06 ng/mL/y TURP and 0.47 vs -0.13 ng/mL/y OP; P < .05).
CONCLUSIONS: Postoperative PSA and PSA velocity measurements can be used to distinguish patients with CaP from those with histologic BPH only.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19428074     DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2008.10.062

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  16 in total

1.  Does mechanical morcellation of large glands compromise incidental prostate cancer detection on specimen analysis? A pathological comparison with open simple prostatectomy.

Authors:  Vincent Misraï; Sébastien Kerever; Marie Pasquie; Benoit Bordier; Julien Guillotreau; Julien Palasse; Virginie Guillotreau; Enrique Rijo; Sébastien Vincendeau; Romain Huet; Romain Mathieu; Benoit Peyronnet; Nathalie Rioux-Leclercq; Eva-Maria Compérat
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2018-10-22       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 2.  Comparison of Patients Undergoing PVP Versus TURP for LUTS/BPH.

Authors:  Blake B Anderson; Joseph J Pariser; Brian T Helfand
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 3.092

3.  Medications and surgical interventions for benign prostatic hyperplasia are potential confounders of prostate-specific antigen.

Authors:  Parth Modi; Brian T Helfand; Kevin T McVary
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 3.092

4.  The Value of Prostate-Specific Antigen-Related Indexes and Imaging Screening in the Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Xiaojing Bai; Yumei Jiang; Xinwei Zhang; Meiyu Wang; Juanhua Tian; Lijun Mu; Yuefeng Du
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2020-08-04       Impact factor: 3.989

5.  "Finding the needle in a haystack": oncologic evaluation of patients treated for LUTS with holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) versus transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP).

Authors:  Annika Herlemann; Kerstin Wegner; Alexander Roosen; Alexander Buchner; Philipp Weinhold; Alexander Bachmann; Christian G Stief; Christian Gratzke; Giuseppe Magistro
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2017-05-17       Impact factor: 4.226

6.  Role of Hiraoka's transurethral detachment of the prostate combined with biopsy of the peripheral zone during the same session in patients with repeated negative biopsies in the diagnosis of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Chun-Yu Pan; Bin Wu; Zi-Chuan Yao; Xian-Qing Zhu; Yun-Zhong Jiang; Song Bai
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2020-06-06       Impact factor: 1.337

Review 7.  Are all procedures for benign prostatic hyperplasia created equal? A systematic review on post-procedural PSA dynamics and its correlation with relief of bladder outlet obstruction.

Authors:  Abhishek Bhat; Ruben Blachman-Braun; Thomas R W Herrmann; Hemendra N Shah
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2021-07-02       Impact factor: 3.661

8.  Incidental prostate cancer in transurethral resection of the prostate specimens in the modern era.

Authors:  Brandon Otto; Christopher Barbieri; Richard Lee; Alexis E Te; Steven A Kaplan; Brian Robinson; Bilal Chughtai
Journal:  Adv Urol       Date:  2014-04-29

9.  Incidental prostate cancer: a 10-year review of a tertiary center, Tehran, Iran.

Authors:  Amir-Reza Abedi; Morteza Fallah-Karkan; Farzad Allameh; Arash Ranjbar; Afshin Shadmehr
Journal:  Res Rep Urol       Date:  2018-01-09

10.  Prostate-specific antigen velocity in diagnosis and prognosis of prostate cancer - a systematic review.

Authors:  Arslaan Javaeed; Sanniya Khan Ghauri; Abdellatif Ibrahim; Mohamed Fahmy Doheim
Journal:  Oncol Rev       Date:  2020-04-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.