Literature DB >> 19427993

The anatomy of a slip: Kinetic and kinematic characteristics of slip and non-slip matched trials.

Raymond W McGorry1, Angela DiDomenico, Chien-Chi Chang.   

Abstract

To improve understanding of slip propagation mechanisms, one could compare features of early stance phase during slips and non-slips. This study investigated the similarities and differences in kinematics and utilized COF of paired trials, defined as a matched pair of slip and non-slip trials produced by the same participant walking on the same floor condition at the same walking speed condition. Twenty-two participants produced 47 matched trial pairs while walking at 1.5, 1.8 and 2.1m/s, over a forceplate with an available COF ranging from 0.12 to 0.21. Heel displacement was captured with an infrared motion tracking system and utilized COF was derived from ground reaction forces. ANOVA revealed no significant differences between the slip and non-slip groups in horizontal heel velocity just prior to heel strike or for heel velocity or slip distance during the 20ms period following heel strike. Significant differences were found between the groups in utilized COF and horizontal heel velocity at 25 and 30ms following heel strike. Differences in heel kinematics and kinetics during early stance phase between the slip and non-slip trials are discussed. The results differ from several previous studies, likely due to methodological differences, as the present study was conducted on marginally slippery surfaces, as opposed to very low COF conditions with thick contaminant layers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19427993     DOI: 10.1016/j.apergo.2009.04.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Ergon        ISSN: 0003-6870            Impact factor:   3.661


  6 in total

1.  Treadmill-gait slip training in community-dwelling older adults: mechanisms of immediate adaptation for a progressive ascending-mixed-intensity protocol.

Authors:  Yiru Wang; Shuaijie Wang; Anna Lee; Yi-Chung Pai; Tanvi Bhatt
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2019-07-08       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Predicting slips based on the STM 603 whole-footwear tribometer under different coefficient of friction testing conditions.

Authors:  Kurt E Beschorner; Arian Iraqi; Mark S Redfern; Rakié Cham; Yue Li
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  2019-02-26       Impact factor: 2.778

3.  Can a single session of treadmill-based slip training reduce daily life falls in community-dwelling older adults? A randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Yiru Wang; Shuaijie Wang; Xuan Liu; Anna Lee; Yi-Chung Pai; Tanvi Bhatt
Journal:  Aging Clin Exp Res       Date:  2022-03-02       Impact factor: 3.636

4.  Kinematics and kinetics of the shoe during human slips.

Authors:  Arian Iraqi; Rakié Cham; Mark S Redfern; Natasa S Vidic; Kurt E Beschorner
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2018-04-25       Impact factor: 2.712

5.  Coefficient of friction testing parameters influence the prediction of human slips.

Authors:  Arian Iraqi; Rakié Cham; Mark S Redfern; Kurt E Beschorner
Journal:  Appl Ergon       Date:  2018-03-20       Impact factor: 3.661

6.  Shoe sole tread designs and outcomes of slipping and falling on slippery floor surfaces.

Authors:  Li-Wen Liu; Yung Hui Lee; Chiuhsiang Joe Lin; Kai Way Li; Chih Yong Chen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-07-24       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.