S Marla1, S Stallard. 1. Department of Surgery, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom. sekhar.marla@gmail.com
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Over the last decade, breast cancer surgery has become less invasive and potentially suitable for day surgery. The aim of this systematic review was to establish the benefits and disadvantages of day surgery for breast cancer. METHODS: A systematic search of the Cochrane Library, Medline, British Nursing Index, CINAHL, EMBASE and PsycINFO was carried out. All relevant papers were assessed for their methodological quality using a checklist designed to assess both randomised and non-randomised studies with specific questions added to address outcome measures. RESULTS: No randomised controlled trials were found in literature. Eleven observational studies were included. The rate of discharge after day surgery was universally high with very low acute readmission rates. Intractable vomiting, patient anxiety and pain control were the main reasons for failing discharge. Patient satisfaction with day surgery was high and psychological recovery was quicker, however, majority of the studies did not use validated questionnaires. The hospital costs were lower for day surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Day surgery for breast cancer is safe, with equivalent complication rates, but there is lack of evidence from randomised controlled trials. Patient satisfaction and psychological well-being is high. Further trials with validated questionnaires are required to confirm this.
BACKGROUND: Over the last decade, breast cancer surgery has become less invasive and potentially suitable for day surgery. The aim of this systematic review was to establish the benefits and disadvantages of day surgery for breast cancer. METHODS: A systematic search of the Cochrane Library, Medline, British Nursing Index, CINAHL, EMBASE and PsycINFO was carried out. All relevant papers were assessed for their methodological quality using a checklist designed to assess both randomised and non-randomised studies with specific questions added to address outcome measures. RESULTS: No randomised controlled trials were found in literature. Eleven observational studies were included. The rate of discharge after day surgery was universally high with very low acute readmission rates. Intractable vomiting, patientanxiety and pain control were the main reasons for failing discharge. Patient satisfaction with day surgery was high and psychological recovery was quicker, however, majority of the studies did not use validated questionnaires. The hospital costs were lower for day surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Day surgery for breast cancer is safe, with equivalent complication rates, but there is lack of evidence from randomised controlled trials. Patient satisfaction and psychological well-being is high. Further trials with validated questionnaires are required to confirm this.
Authors: Giovanni Mauri; Luca Maria Sconfienza; Lorenzo Carlo Pescatori; Maria Paola Fedeli; Marco Alì; Giovanni Di Leo; Francesco Sardanelli Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2017-01-03 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Susan W Wesmiller; Catherine M Bender; Yvette P Conley; Dana H Bovbjerg; Gretchen Ahrendt; Marguerite Bonaventura; Susan M Sereika Journal: J Perianesth Nurs Date: 2016-09-01 Impact factor: 1.084
Authors: Ruvinder Athwal; Mahmood Dakka; Donna Appleton; Simon Harries; Dayalan Clarke; Lucie Jones Journal: Breast Care (Basel) Date: 2015-02 Impact factor: 2.860
Authors: Susan W Wesmiller; Richard A Henker; Susan M Sereika; Heidi S Donovan; Li Meng; Gary S Gruen; Ivan S Tarkin; Yvette P Conley Journal: Biol Res Nurs Date: 2012-06-20 Impact factor: 2.522
Authors: Susan W Wesmiller; Susan M Sereika; Catherine M Bender; Dana Bovbjerg; Gretchen Ahrendt; Marguerite Bonaventura; Yvette P Conley Journal: Auton Neurosci Date: 2016-09-28 Impact factor: 3.145
Authors: Susan W Wesmiller; Catherine M Bender; Susan M Sereika; Gretchen Ahrendt; Marguerite Bonaventura; Dana H Bovbjerg; Yvette Conley Journal: Oncol Nurs Forum Date: 2014-03-01 Impact factor: 2.172
Authors: Christopher J Pannucci; Amy Shanks; Marc J Moote; Vinita Bahl; Paul S Cederna; Norah N Naughton; Thomas W Wakefield; Peter K Henke; Darrell A Campbell; Sachin Kheterpal Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2012-06 Impact factor: 12.969