Literature DB >> 19427274

Temporary leadless pacing in heart failure patients with ultrasound-mediated stimulation energy and effects on the acoustic window.

Kathy L Lee1, Hung-Fat Tse, Debra S Echt, Chu-Pak Lau.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Left ventricular stimulation for cardiac resynchronization therapy is largely limited by access and anatomy of coronary veins.
OBJECTIVE: This study sought to apply ultrasound-mediated leadless pacing technology in heart failure patients and to evaluate the effects of respiration and body posture on the acoustic window.
METHODS: Patients with advanced heart failure and ejection fraction <or=35% were studied. An electrophysiology catheter incorporating a receiver electrode to deliver ultrasound-mediated pacing was positioned in the left ventricle. Ultrasound-mediated pacing thresholds were determined. The acoustic windows on the chest wall with the patient lying supine, titled 30 degrees leftward, 30 degrees rightward, and 30 degrees upward were determined. The acoustic windows were also determined with computed tomography and transthoracic echocardiography. Simulated receiver movement with respiratory movement and body positioning was assessed with computed tomography.
RESULTS: Ten patients were studied. Ultrasound-mediated pacing was successful in all patients. The acoustic window measured 39.6 +/- 18.2 cm(2). The window size decreased with rightward tilt, and increased with leftward and upward tilt. They correlated with measurements made by transthoracic echocardiography and computed tomography. Target receiver movement of 1.2 +/- 1.4 cm horizontally and 1.3 +/- 0.8 cm vertically were estimated by computed tomography.
CONCLUSION: The feasibility of leadless left ventricular stimulation was shown acutely in heart failure patients. The acoustic window validated by computed tomography was predicted by transthoracic echocardiography. Effects of respiration and body posture were evaluated for development of the future implantable device.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19427274     DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2009.02.025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heart Rhythm        ISSN: 1547-5271            Impact factor:   6.343


  8 in total

Review 1.  How to improve outcomes with cardiac resynchronisation therapy: importance of lead positioning.

Authors:  Peter J Cowburn; Christophe Leclercq
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 4.214

2.  [Electrical therapy for heart failure. Perspectives for 2011].

Authors:  C W Israel
Journal:  Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol       Date:  2011-03

Review 3.  [Cardiac resynchronisation therapy : new data and technical developments].

Authors:  C Butter
Journal:  Herz       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 1.443

Review 4.  Are electronic cardiac devices still evolving?

Authors:  G Carrault; P Mabo
Journal:  Yearb Med Inform       Date:  2014-08-15

Review 5.  Wireless microstimulators for neural prosthetics.

Authors:  Mesut Sahin; Victor Pikov
Journal:  Crit Rev Biomed Eng       Date:  2011

Review 6.  Electromechanical dyssynchrony and resynchronization of the failing heart.

Authors:  Jonathan A Kirk; David A Kass
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  2013-08-30       Impact factor: 17.367

Review 7.  Leadless Cardiac Pacemakers: Pacing Paradigm Change.

Authors:  Petr Neuzil; Vivek Y Reddy
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 8.  Chronic ventricular pacing in children: toward prevention of pacing-induced heart disease.

Authors:  Irene E van Geldorp; Ward Y Vanagt; Frits W Prinzen; Tammo Delhaas
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 4.214

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.