Brian E Perron1, Matthew O Howard. 1. University of Michigan, School of Social Work, 1080 S. University Avenue, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA. beperron@umich.edu
Abstract
AIMS: To compare adolescent inhalant users without DSM-IV inhalant use disorders (IUDs) to youth with IUDs (i.e. abuse or dependence) across demographic, psychosocial and clinical measures. DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey with structured psychiatric interviews. SETTING: Facilities (n = 32) comprising the Missouri Division of Youth Services (MDYS) residential treatment system for juvenile offenders. Participants Current MDYS residents (n = 723); 97.7% of residents participated. Most youth were male (87%) and in mid-adolescence (mean = 15.5 years, standard deviation = 1.2, range = 11-20); more than one-third (38.6%, n = 279) reported life-time inhalant use. MEASUREMENTS: Antisocial behavior, temperament, trauma-exposure, suicidality, psychiatric symptoms and substance-related problems. FINDINGS: Among life-time inhalant users, 46.9% met criteria for a life-time DSM-IV IUD (inhalant abuse = 18.6%, inhalant dependence = 28.3%). Bivariate analyses showed that, in comparison to non-users, inhalant users with and without an IUD were more likely to be Caucasian, live in rural or small towns, have higher levels of anxiety and depressive symptoms, evidence more impulsive and fearless temperaments and report more past-year antisocial behavior and life-time suicidality, traumatic experiences and global substance use problems. A monotonic relationship between inhalant use, abuse and dependence and adverse outcomes was observed, with comparatively high rates of dysfunction observed among inhalant-dependent youth. Multivariate regression analyses showed that inhalant users with and without an IUD had greater levels of suicidal ideation and substance use problems than non-users. CONCLUSIONS: Youth with IUDs have personal histories characterized by high levels of trauma, suicidality, psychiatric distress, antisocial behavior and substance-related problems. A monotonic relationship between inhalant use, abuse and dependence and serious adverse outcomes was observed.
AIMS: To compare adolescent inhalant users without DSM-IV inhalant use disorders (IUDs) to youth with IUDs (i.e. abuse or dependence) across demographic, psychosocial and clinical measures. DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey with structured psychiatric interviews. SETTING: Facilities (n = 32) comprising the Missouri Division of Youth Services (MDYS) residential treatment system for juvenile offenders. Participants Current MDYS residents (n = 723); 97.7% of residents participated. Most youth were male (87%) and in mid-adolescence (mean = 15.5 years, standard deviation = 1.2, range = 11-20); more than one-third (38.6%, n = 279) reported life-time inhalant use. MEASUREMENTS: Antisocial behavior, temperament, trauma-exposure, suicidality, psychiatric symptoms and substance-related problems. FINDINGS: Among life-time inhalant users, 46.9% met criteria for a life-time DSM-IV IUD (inhalant abuse = 18.6%, inhalant dependence = 28.3%). Bivariate analyses showed that, in comparison to non-users, inhalant users with and without an IUD were more likely to be Caucasian, live in rural or small towns, have higher levels of anxiety and depressive symptoms, evidence more impulsive and fearless temperaments and report more past-year antisocial behavior and life-time suicidality, traumatic experiences and global substance use problems. A monotonic relationship between inhalant use, abuse and dependence and adverse outcomes was observed, with comparatively high rates of dysfunction observed among inhalant-dependent youth. Multivariate regression analyses showed that inhalant users with and without an IUD had greater levels of suicidal ideation and substance use problems than non-users. CONCLUSIONS: Youth with IUDs have personal histories characterized by high levels of trauma, suicidality, psychiatric distress, antisocial behavior and substance-related problems. A monotonic relationship between inhalant use, abuse and dependence and serious adverse outcomes was observed.
Authors: Brian E Perron; Michael G Vaughn; Matthew O Howard; Amy Bohnert; Erick Guerrero Journal: J Stud Alcohol Drugs Date: 2010-07 Impact factor: 2.582
Authors: Allison J Ober; Jeremy N V Miles; Brett Ewing; Joan S Tucker; Elizabeth J D'Amico Journal: J Stud Alcohol Drugs Date: 2013-11 Impact factor: 2.582
Authors: Jhodie Rubina Duncan; Alec Lindsay Ward Dick; Gary Egan; Scott Kolbe; Maria Gavrilescu; David Wright; Dan Ian Lubman; Andrew John Lawrence Journal: PLoS One Date: 2012-09-18 Impact factor: 3.240