Literature DB >> 19425957

Evaluating temperature regulation by field-active ectotherms: the fallacy of the inappropriate question.

P E Hertz, R B Huey, R D Stevenson.   

Abstract

We describe a research protocol for evaluating temperature regulation from data on small field-active ectothermic animals, especially lizards. The protocol requires data on body temperatures (Tb) of field-active ectotherms, on available operative temperatures (Te, "null temperatures" for nonregulating animals), and on the thermoregulatory set-point range (preferred body temperatures, Tset). These data are used to estimate several quantitative indexes that collectively summarize temperature regulation: the "precision" of body temperature (variance in Tb, or an equivalent metric), the "accuracy" of body temperature relative to the set-point range (the average difference between Tb and Tset), and the "effectiveness" of thermoregulation (the extent to which body temperatures are closer on the average to the set-point range than are operative temperatures). If additional data on the thermal dependence of performance are available, the impact of thermoregulation on performance (the extent to which performance is enhanced relative to that of nonregulating animals) can also be estimated. A sample analysis of the thermal biology of three Anolis lizards in Puerto Rico demonstrates the utility of the new protocol and its superiority to previous methods of evaluating temperature regulation. We also discuss several ways in which the research protocol can be extended and applied to other organisms.

Year:  1993        PMID: 19425957     DOI: 10.1086/285573

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Nat        ISSN: 0003-0147            Impact factor:   3.926


  77 in total

1.  Tests of the contribution of acclimation to geographic variation in water loss rates of the West Indian lizard Anolis cristatellus.

Authors:  Alex R Gunderson; Jeremy Siegel; Manuel Leal
Journal:  J Comp Physiol B       Date:  2011-04-23       Impact factor: 2.200

2.  Interactive influence of biotic and abiotic cues on the plasticity of preferred body temperatures in a predator-prey system.

Authors:  Radovan Smolinský; Lumír Gvoždík
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2012-02-23       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Global metabolic impacts of recent climate warming.

Authors:  Michael E Dillon; George Wang; Raymond B Huey
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2010-10-07       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 4.  Physiological mechanisms of thermoregulation in reptiles: a review.

Authors:  Frank Seebacher; Craig E Franklin
Journal:  J Comp Physiol B       Date:  2005-11-11       Impact factor: 2.200

5.  Thermal quality influences effectiveness of thermoregulation, habitat use, and behaviour in milk snakes.

Authors:  Jeffrey R Row; Gabriel Blouin-Demers
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2006-01-20       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  The potential for behavioral thermoregulation to buffer "cold-blooded" animals against climate warming.

Authors:  Michael Kearney; Richard Shine; Warren P Porter
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-02-20       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Can behavior douse the fire of climate warming?

Authors:  Raymond B Huey; Joshua J Tewksbury
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-03-10       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Thermal physiology of three sympatric and syntopic Liolaemidae lizards in cold and arid environments of Patagonia (Argentina).

Authors:  F Duran; E L Kubisch; Jorgelina M Boretto
Journal:  J Comp Physiol B       Date:  2017-07-19       Impact factor: 2.200

9.  Wind constraints on the thermoregulation of high mountain lizards.

Authors:  Zaida Ortega; Abraham Mencía; Valentín Pérez-Mellado
Journal:  Int J Biometeorol       Date:  2016-08-16       Impact factor: 3.787

10.  Experimental support for the cost-benefit model of lizard thermoregulation: the effects of predation risk and food supply.

Authors:  Gábor Herczeg; Annika Herrero; Jarmo Saarikivi; Abigél Gonda; Maria Jäntti; Juha Merilä
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2007-11-06       Impact factor: 3.225

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.