Literature DB >> 19425357

Why not procrastinate? Development and validation of a new active procrastination scale.

Jin Nam Choi1, Sarah V Moran.   

Abstract

Procrastination has been studied as a dysfunctional, self-effacing behavior that ultimately results in undesirable outcomes. However, A. H. C. Chu and J. N. Choi (2005) found a different form of procrastination (i.e., active procrastination) that leads to desirable outcomes. The construct of active procrastination has a high potential to expand the time management literature and is likely to be adopted by researchers in multiple areas of psychology. To facilitate the research on this new construct and its further integration into the literature, the authors developed and validated a new, expanded measure of active procrastination that reliably assesses its four dimensions. Using this new measure of active procrastination, they further examined its nomological network. The new 16-item measure is a critical step toward further empirical investigation of active procrastination.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19425357     DOI: 10.3200/SOCP.149.2.195-212

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Soc Psychol        ISSN: 0022-4545


  10 in total

1.  I could do it now, but I'd rather (forget to) do it later: examining links between procrastination and prospective memory failures.

Authors:  Sascha Zuber; Nicola Ballhausen; Maximilian Haas; Stéphanie Cauvin; Chloé Da Silva Coelho; Anne-Sophie Daviet; Andreas Ihle; Matthias Kliegel
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2020-05-22

2.  Active and passive procrastination in terms of temperament and character.

Authors:  Ada H Zohar; Lior Pesah Shimone; Meirav Hen
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2019-05-29       Impact factor: 2.984

3.  The Unintentional Procrastination Scale.

Authors:  Bruce A Fernie; Zinnia Bharucha; Ana V Nikčević; Marcantonio M Spada
Journal:  J Ration Emot Cogn Behav Ther       Date:  2016-08-11

4.  Academic Procrastination and Online Learning During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Authors:  Jørgen Melgaard; Rubina Monir; Lester Allan Lasrado; Asle Fagerstrøm
Journal:  Procedia Comput Sci       Date:  2022-01-10

5.  Self-Report Measures of Procrastination Exhibit Inconsistent Concurrent Validity, Predictive Validity, and Psychometric Properties.

Authors:  Lisa Vangsness; Nathaniel M Voss; Noelle Maddox; Victoria Devereaux; Emma Martin
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-02-24

6.  Towards a Dimensional, Multifactorial, and Integrative Approach to Procrastination in Everyday Life: An Illustration through Interviews.

Authors:  Marie My Lien Rebetez; Catherine Barsics; Timothé Montisci; Lucien Rochat
Journal:  Psychol Belg       Date:  2022-04-18

7.  The relationship between just world belief and wellbeing, cheating behaviors, and academic work behaviors during COVID 19 among university students.

Authors:  Susan Münscher
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-08-22       Impact factor: 4.996

8.  Does Procrastination Always Predict Lower Life Satisfaction? A Study on the Moderation Effect of Self-Regulation in China and the United Kingdom.

Authors:  Zeyang Yang
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2021-07-06

9.  Procrastinating Behavior in Computer-Based Learning Environments to Predict Performance: A Case Study in Moodle.

Authors:  Rebeca Cerezo; María Esteban; Miguel Sánchez-Santillán; José C Núñez
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-08-24

10.  Do self-reports of procrastination predict actual behavior?

Authors:  Sascha Zuber; Stéphanie Cauvin; Maximilian Haas; Anne-Sophie Daviet; Chloé Da Silva Coelho; Matthias Kliegel
Journal:  Int J Methods Psychiatr Res       Date:  2020-06-12       Impact factor: 4.035

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.