Literature DB >> 19425202

Cytonuclear interactions can favor the evolution of genomic imprinting.

Jason B Wolf1.   

Abstract

Interactions between cytoplasmic (generally organelle) and nuclear genomes may be relatively common and could potentially have major fitness consequences. As in the case of within-genome epistasis, this cytonuclear epistasis can favor the evolutionary coadaptation of high-fitness combinations of nuclear and cytoplasmic alleles. Because cytoplasmic factors are generally uniparentally inherited, the cytoplasmic genome is inherited along with only one of the nuclear haplotypes, and therefore, coadaptation is expected to evolve through the interaction of these coinherited (usually maternally inherited) genomes. Here I show that, as a result of this coinheritance of the two genomes, cytonuclear epistasis can favor the evolution of genomic imprinting such that, when the cytoplasmic factor is maternally inherited, selection favors maternal expression of the nuclear locus and when the factor is paternally inherited selection favors paternal expression. Genomic imprinting evolves in this model because it leads to a pattern of gene expression in the nuclear haplotype that is coadapted with (i.e., adaptively coordinated with) gene expression in the coinherited cytoplasmic genome.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19425202     DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2009.00632.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  24 in total

Review 1.  Non-conflict theories for the evolution of genomic imprinting.

Authors:  H G Spencer; A G Clark
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2014-01-08       Impact factor: 3.821

Review 2.  Endosperm and Imprinting, Inextricably Linked.

Authors:  Mary Gehring; P R Satyaki
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2016-11-28       Impact factor: 8.340

3.  The maternal cytoplasmic environment may be involved in the viability selection of gametes and zygotes.

Authors:  Z X Tang; X F Wang; M Z Zhang; Y H Zhang; D X Deng; C W Xu
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2012-11-21       Impact factor: 3.821

4.  Testing the kinship theory of intragenomic conflict in honey bees (Apis mellifera).

Authors:  David A Galbraith; Sarah D Kocher; Tom Glenn; Istvan Albert; Greg J Hunt; Joan E Strassmann; David C Queller; Christina M Grozinger
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-01-11       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 5.  Gene interactions in the evolution of genomic imprinting.

Authors:  J B Wolf; Y Brandvain
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2014-03-12       Impact factor: 3.821

6.  Detection of subgenome bias using an anchored syntenic approach in Eleusine coracana (finger millet).

Authors:  Nathan D Hall; Jinesh D Patel; J Scott McElroy; Leslie R Goertzen
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2021-03-12       Impact factor: 3.969

7.  Hierarchical nuclear and cytoplasmic genetic architectures for plant growth and defense within Arabidopsis.

Authors:  Bindu Joseph; Jason A Corwin; Tobias Züst; Baohua Li; Majid Iravani; Gabriela Schaepman-Strub; Lindsay A Turnbull; Daniel J Kliebenstein
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2013-06-07       Impact factor: 11.277

8.  Matrisibs, patrisibs, and the evolution of imprinting on autosomes and sex chromosomes.

Authors:  Yaniv Brandvain
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 3.926

9.  Evolution of genomic imprinting as a coordinator of coadapted gene expression.

Authors:  Jason B Wolf
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-03-11       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  De novo assembly of the carrot mitochondrial genome using next generation sequencing of whole genomic DNA provides first evidence of DNA transfer into an angiosperm plastid genome.

Authors:  Massimo Iorizzo; Douglas Senalik; Marek Szklarczyk; Dariusz Grzebelus; David Spooner; Philipp Simon
Journal:  BMC Plant Biol       Date:  2012-05-01       Impact factor: 4.215

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.