Literature DB >> 19424926

Change of search time and non-search time in X-ray baggage screening due to training.

Saskia M Koller1, Colin G Drury, Adrian Schwaninger.   

Abstract

As found in studies of aircraft structural inspection, the time used for judging if a part of an aircraft shows tiny cracks is composed of search time, used for actively scanning, and non-search time, used for matching and decision while fixating a region of interest (Drury et al. 1997). These findings can be applied to detection of threats by X-ray screening of passenger bags at airports. To investigate whether search time and non-search time change when an experienced screener is given additional training in recognising threat objects in passenger bags, data from a European airport were analysed. A comparison of detection performance and reaction time between two large groups of screeners, one trained for 6 months, shows a large impact of training on overall performance and on both search and non-search components of the task. There was also a small but consistent decline in performance measures with screener age. This study shows a way to localise the effect of training on threat detection performance for aviation security screening. Analysis of the time needed for screening each passenger bag showed that training had a significant effect, particularly on the non-search part of the searching process (i.e. identification, recognition, decision, response execution, etc.).

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19424926     DOI: 10.1080/00140130802526935

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ergonomics        ISSN: 0014-0139            Impact factor:   2.778


  7 in total

1.  Emotional Exhaustion and Job Satisfaction in Airport Security Officers - Work-Family Conflict as Mediator in the Job Demands-Resources Model.

Authors:  Sophie Baeriswyl; Andreas Krause; Adrian Schwaninger
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-05-09

Review 2.  Using Eye Movements to Understand how Security Screeners Search for Threats in X-Ray Baggage.

Authors:  Nick Donnelly; Alex Muhl-Richardson; Hayward J Godwin; Kyle R Cave
Journal:  Vision (Basel)       Date:  2019-06-04

3.  XRIndex: a brief screening tool for individual differences in security threat detection in x-ray images.

Authors:  Elena Rusconi; Francesca Ferri; Essi Viding; Timothy Mitchener-Nissen
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2015-08-10       Impact factor: 3.169

4.  Detecting Bombs in X-Ray Images of Hold Baggage: 2D Versus 3D Imaging.

Authors:  Nicole Hättenschwiler; Marcia Mendes; Adrian Schwaninger
Journal:  Hum Factors       Date:  2018-09-24       Impact factor: 2.888

5.  Expertise, Automation and Trust in X-Ray Screening of Cabin Baggage.

Authors:  Alain Chavaillaz; Adrian Schwaninger; Stefan Michel; Juergen Sauer
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2019-02-14

6.  Detection measures for visual inspection of X-ray images of passenger baggage.

Authors:  Yanik Sterchi; Nicole Hättenschwiler; Adrian Schwaninger
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 2.199

7.  How Realistic Is Threat Image Projection for X-ray Baggage Screening?

Authors:  Robin Riz À Porta; Yanik Sterchi; Adrian Schwaninger
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-13       Impact factor: 3.576

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.