OBJECTIVE: Literature review and meta-analysis to review the evidence of relationship between the presence of right-to-left shunts (RLSs) and the occurrence of neurological decompression sickness (DCS) in divers. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE, Google Scholar, and Health Technology Assessment databases. STUDY SELECTION: Five case-control studies in which the prevalence of a RLS in a group of divers with neurological DCS was compared with that of a group of divers with no history of DCS, 3 cross-transversal studies in which the prevalence of RLS was measured in divers with neurological DCS, and 4 cross-transversal studies in which the prevalence of RLS was measured in divers with no history of DCS were reviewed. DATA EXTRACTION: Only case-control studies were retained for meta-analysis. DATA SYNTHESIS: This meta-analysis gathers 5 studies and 654 divers. The combined odds ratio of neurological DCS in divers with RLS was 4.23 (3.05-5.87). The meta-analysis including only large RLS found a combined odds ratio of 6.49 (4.34-9.71). CONCLUSIONS: Because of a low incidence of neurological DCS, increase in absolute risk of neurological DCS due to RLS is probably small. Thus, in recreational diving, the systematic screening of RLS seems unnecessary. In professional divers, because of a chronic exposition and unknown consequences of cerebral asymptomatic lesions, these results raise again the benefit of the transcranial Doppler in the screening and quantification of the RLS, independently of their location.
OBJECTIVE: Literature review and meta-analysis to review the evidence of relationship between the presence of right-to-left shunts (RLSs) and the occurrence of neurological decompression sickness (DCS) in divers. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE, Google Scholar, and Health Technology Assessment databases. STUDY SELECTION: Five case-control studies in which the prevalence of a RLS in a group of divers with neurological DCS was compared with that of a group of divers with no history of DCS, 3 cross-transversal studies in which the prevalence of RLS was measured in divers with neurological DCS, and 4 cross-transversal studies in which the prevalence of RLS was measured in divers with no history of DCS were reviewed. DATA EXTRACTION: Only case-control studies were retained for meta-analysis. DATA SYNTHESIS: This meta-analysis gathers 5 studies and 654 divers. The combined odds ratio of neurological DCS in divers with RLS was 4.23 (3.05-5.87). The meta-analysis including only large RLS found a combined odds ratio of 6.49 (4.34-9.71). CONCLUSIONS: Because of a low incidence of neurological DCS, increase in absolute risk of neurological DCS due to RLS is probably small. Thus, in recreational diving, the systematic screening of RLS seems unnecessary. In professional divers, because of a chronic exposition and unknown consequences of cerebral asymptomatic lesions, these results raise again the benefit of the transcranial Doppler in the screening and quantification of the RLS, independently of their location.
Authors: Björn Edvinsson; Ulf Thilén; Niels Erik Nielsen; Christina Christersson; Mikael Dellborg; Peter Eriksson; Joanna Hlebowicz Journal: Diving Hyperb Med Date: 2021-03-31 Impact factor: 0.887
Authors: Sebastian Klapa; Johannes Meyne; Wataru Kähler; Frauke Tillmans; Henning Werr; Andreas Binder; Andreas Koch Journal: Physiol Rep Date: 2017-03