Literature DB >> 19423519

A controlled trial of objective measures of sunscreen and moisturizing lotion.

Tom Elliott1, Eric J Nehl, Karen Glanz.   

Abstract

Taking an alcohol swab of a person's forearm and analyzing it using a spectrophotometer has been shown to be a reliable method for detecting the presence of sunscreen. The aims of this study were to determine if moisturizing lotions or other non-sunscreen products influence the absorbance readings from skin swabs in a controlled setting, and to establish the cutoff point in determining the presence or absence of sunscreen using a crystal cuvette instead of a plastic one. In a controlled trial of 30 volunteer office workers, absorbance readings from two popular brands of sunscreen with sun-protection factors (SPF) of 30 and 45 were compared with absorbance readings from two different moisturizing lotions, one with an SPF of 15 and another with no stated SPF. Moisturizers with SPF 15 tested positive for sunscreen, with absorbance readings (mean, 3.77; min, 3.30) comparable to sunblock with SPF 30 or 45 (mean, 3.51; min, 2.02). Moisturizers with no stated SPF factor tested negative for the presence of sunscreen, with extremely low absorbance readings (mean, 0.06; max, 0.19) similar to control readings. The skin swabbing technique remains a valid and useful method for detecting the presence of sunscreen and does not result in false positives when moisturizers with no stated SPF are present. Using a conservative cutoff point of 0.30 with a crystal cuvette reduces any chance of false-positive readings and remains robust when sunscreen of SPF 15 or higher is present.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19423519      PMCID: PMC3725572          DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-08-0492

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev        ISSN: 1055-9965            Impact factor:   4.254


  6 in total

1.  A noninvasive objective measure of sunscreen use and reapplication.

Authors:  David L O'Riordan; Kevin B Lunde; Johann Urschitz; Karen Glanz
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 4.254

2.  Validity of beachgoers' self-report of their sun habits.

Authors:  David L O'Riordan; Kevin B Lunde; Alana D Steffen; Jason E Maddock
Journal:  Arch Dermatol       Date:  2006-10

Review 3.  Reducing ultraviolet radiation exposure to prevent skin cancer methodology and measurement.

Authors:  Karen Glanz; Joni A Mayer
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 5.043

4.  Application patterns among participants randomized to daily sunscreen use in a skin cancer prevention trial.

Authors:  Rachel Neale; Gail Williams; Adèle Green
Journal:  Arch Dermatol       Date:  2002-10

5.  A pilot study of the validity of self-reported ultraviolet radiation exposure and sun protection practices among lifeguards, parents and children.

Authors:  David L O'Riordan; Karen Glanz; Peter Gies; Tom Elliott
Journal:  Photochem Photobiol       Date:  2008-01-07       Impact factor: 3.421

6.  A rapid method for determining recent sunscreen use in field studies.

Authors:  David C Whiteman; Robyn M Brown; Chunxia Xu; Christine L Paterson; David Miller; Peter G Parsons
Journal:  J Photochem Photobiol B       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 6.252

  6 in total
  1 in total

1.  Design and baseline data of a randomized trial comparing two methods for scaling-up an occupational sun protection intervention.

Authors:  David B Buller; Mary Klein Buller; Richard Meenan; Gary R Cutter; Julia Berteletti; Rachel Eye; Barbara J Walkosz; Sherry Pagoto
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2020-09-15       Impact factor: 2.226

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.