Literature DB >> 19423292

Echocardiographic myocardial scar burden predicts response to cardiac resynchronization therapy in ischemic heart failure.

Donato Mele1, Eustachio Agricola, Maurizio Galderisi, Fausto Rigo, Rodolfo Citro, Alessandro Dal Monte, Patrizia Della Valentina, Alice Calabrese, Roberto Ferrari.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Because echocardiography is routinely applied for left ventricle (LV) evaluation before cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT), it is important to know whether echocardiographic assessment of myocardial scar burden may also help to predict CRT response in patients with drug-refractory systolic heart failure of ischemic origin.
METHODS: Seventy-one patients with ischemic heart failure who underwent CRT were retrospectively analyzed. The number of LV scar segments was evaluated in each patient, defining transmural scar as an end-diastolic wall thickness < or = 5 mm associated with increased acoustic reflectance. CRT response was defined by LV end-systolic volume decrease by at least 10% after 6 months of treatment. The role of pacing site with respect to scar location was also assessed.
RESULTS: Thirty-nine patients (55%) were responders and 32 patients (45%) were nonresponders to CRT. At baseline, responders had a lower number of scar segments (1.7 +/- 1.6 vs 3.5 +/- 2.5, P = .001). The number of scar segments was significantly associated with CRT response and correlated significantly with end-systolic volume variation (r = 0.57, P = .0001). The presence of 3 or more scar segments allowed the identification of nonresponders with a sensitivity of 62% and specificity of 71%. In responders, the pacing stimulus was more frequently delivered remote from scar segments, whereas in nonresponders it was more often delivered over the scar segments.
CONCLUSION: Echocardiographic evaluation of transmural scar burden predicts CRT response after 6 months of treatment and should be performed in all candidates for CRT with ischemic heart failure before biventricular pacemaker implantation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19423292     DOI: 10.1016/j.echo.2009.03.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Soc Echocardiogr        ISSN: 0894-7317            Impact factor:   5.251


  11 in total

Review 1.  Current role of echocardiography in cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  Donato Mele; Matteo Bertini; Michele Malagù; Marianna Nardozza; Roberto Ferrari
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 4.214

Review 2.  Targeting left ventricular lead placement to improve cardiac resynchronization therapy outcomes.

Authors:  Jeffrey Liu; Evan Adelstein; Samir Saba
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 2.931

3.  SPECT gated blood pool phase analysis of lateral wall motion for prediction of CRT response.

Authors:  Michel Lalonde; David Birnie; Terrence D Ruddy; Robert A deKemp; Rob S B Beanlands; Richard Wassenaar; R Glenn Wells
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2014-01-09       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 4.  Cardiac resynchronization therapy: the issue of non-response.

Authors:  Luigi Padeletti; Alessandro Paoletti Perini; Edoardo Gronda
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 4.214

Review 5.  Novel Pacing Strategies for Heart Failure Management.

Authors:  Jordan S Leyton-Mange; Theofanie Mela
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2017-08

Review 6.  Optimizing CRT - Do We Need More Leads and Delivery Methods.

Authors:  Pieter Martens; Frederik Hendrik Verbrugge; Wilfried Mullens
Journal:  J Atr Fibrillation       Date:  2015-04-30

7.  A Review of Image-guided Approaches for Cardiac Resynchronisation Therapy.

Authors:  Haipeng Tang; Shaojie Tang; Weihua Zhou
Journal:  Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev       Date:  2017-06

Review 8.  Pre-Implant Assessment For Optimal LV Lead Placement In CRT: ECG, ECHO, or MRI?

Authors:  Matthew J Singleton; David D Spragg
Journal:  J Atr Fibrillation       Date:  2015-08-31

Review 9.  Echocardiographic prediction of outcome after cardiac resynchronization therapy: conventional methods and recent developments.

Authors:  Geert E Leenders; Maarten J Cramer; Margot D Bogaard; Mathias Meine; Pieter A Doevendans; Bart W De Boeck
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 4.214

10.  Induced pluripotent stem cell intervention rescues ventricular wall motion disparity, achieving biological cardiac resynchronization post-infarction.

Authors:  Satsuki Yamada; Timothy J Nelson; Garvan C Kane; Almudena Martinez-Fernandez; Ruben J Crespo-Diaz; Yasuhiro Ikeda; Carmen Perez-Terzic; Andre Terzic
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2013-04-08       Impact factor: 5.182

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.