Literature DB >> 19423288

Cardiac dyssynchrony quantitated by time-to-peak or temporal uniformity of strain at longitudinal, circumferential, and radial level: implications for resynchronization therapy.

Benedetta Bertola1, Elisa Rondano, Marina Sulis, Gianni Sarasso, Cristina Piccinino, Giuliano Marti, Paolo Devecchi, Andrea Magnani, Gabriella Francalacci, Paolo N Marino.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The standard deviation of time to peak strain (TPS-SD) has been proposed as an index of left ventricular (LV) dyssynchrony in patients to be resynchronized. However, TPS-SD is sensitive to noise, and the influence of outliers on TPS-SD is also relevant. Alternatively, dyssynchrony can be indexed by temporal uniformity of strain (TUS), whereby a time plot of regional strains, arranged for LV location, is subjected to Fourier analysis. If segments shorten simultaneously (synchronously), the plot appears as a straight line, with power only in the zero-order Fourier term, whereas regionally clustered dyssynchrony generates an undulating plot with higher power in the first-order term. TUS index reflects zero-order relative to first-order plus zero-order power.
METHODS: In this study, TUS and TPS-SD were computed in 68 patients (QRS duration >/= 120 ms; ejection fraction </= 0.35) in whom longitudinal, circumferential, and radial strains were measured using speckle-tracking two-dimensional echocardiography before and 3 to 6 months after cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT), together with LV volumes.
RESULTS: Following CRT, LV volume decreased (diastolic, -10 +/- 20%) and ejection fraction improved from 0.23 +/- 0.07% to 0.30 +/- 0.10% (P < .001 for both). Circumferential strain was ameliorated as well (P = .054). Two-way analysis of variance revealed TUS improvement after CRT (P = .043), with a trend for CRT to contrast asynchrony at the circumferential (+0.06 +/- 0.25) and longitudinal (+0.05 +/- 0.18) levels compared with the radial level (-0.002 +/- 0.18) (interaction P = .06). This was not true for TPS-SD. Multivariate analysis revealed that only TUS, assessed before CRT circumferentially, predicted ejection fraction improvement after CRT. Other asynchrony variables failed in the model.
CONCLUSION: Dyssynchrony indexed by circumferential TUS yields greater CRT benefits than that indexed by TPS-SD, supporting the idea of targeting TUS-measured dyssynchrony as a more informative quantitative measurement in CRT patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19423288     DOI: 10.1016/j.echo.2009.03.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Soc Echocardiogr        ISSN: 0894-7317            Impact factor:   5.251


  9 in total

1.  Myocardial motion and deformation patterns in an experimental swine model of acute LBBB/CRT and chronic infarct.

Authors:  Nicolas Duchateau; Marta Sitges; Adelina Doltra; Juan Fernández-Armenta; Nuria Solanes; Montserrat Rigol; Luigi Gabrielli; Etelvino Silva; Aina Barceló; Antonio Berruezo; Lluís Mont; Josep Brugada; Bart Bijnens
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2014-03-21       Impact factor: 2.357

2.  Baseline asynchrony, assessed circumferentially using temporal uniformity of strain, besides coincidence between site of latest mechanical activation and presumed left ventricular lead position, predicts favourable prognosis after resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  Chiara Cavallino; Elisa Rondano; Andrea Magnani; Lucia Leva; Eugenio Inglese; Gabriele Dell'era; Eraldo Occhetta; Miriam Bortnik; Paolo N Marino
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2011-06-19       Impact factor: 2.357

3.  The Prognostic Value of Left Ventricular Mechanical Dyssynchrony Derived from Cardiac MRI in Patients with Idiopathic Dilated Cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  Yangjie Li; Xiumin Liu; Yuanwei Xu; Weihao Li; Siqi Tang; Xiaoyue Zhou; Jiayu Sun; Qing Zhang; Yuchi Han; Yucheng Chen
Journal:  Radiol Cardiothorac Imaging       Date:  2021-08-26

4.  It's time for a paradigm shift in the quantitative evaluation of left ventricular dyssynchrony.

Authors:  Brandon K Fornwalt; Jana G Delfino; William W Sprague; John N Oshinski
Journal:  J Am Soc Echocardiogr       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 5.251

Review 5.  Echocardiographic prediction of outcome after cardiac resynchronization therapy: conventional methods and recent developments.

Authors:  Geert E Leenders; Maarten J Cramer; Margot D Bogaard; Mathias Meine; Pieter A Doevendans; Bart W De Boeck
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 4.214

6.  Acute contractile recovery extent during biventricular pacing is not associated with follow-up in patients undergoing resynchronization.

Authors:  Federica DeVecchi; Emanuela Facchini; Anna Degiovanni; Chiara Sartori; Chiara Cavallino; Matteo Santagostino; Virginia Di Ruocco; Andrea Magnani; Eraldo Occhetta; Paolo Nicola Marino
Journal:  Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc       Date:  2016-04-01

7.  Volumetric motion quantification by 3D tissue phase mapped CMR.

Authors:  Anja Lutz; Jan Paul; Axel Bornstedt; G Ulrich Nienhaus; Patrick Etyngier; Peter Bernhardt; Wolfgang Rottbauer; Volker Rasche
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2012-10-26       Impact factor: 5.364

8.  Systolic heart failure and cardiac resynchronization therapy: a focus on diastole.

Authors:  Emanuela Facchini; Marco Varalda; Chiara Sartori; Daniel Burkhoff; Paolo Nicola Marino
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2014-04-05       Impact factor: 2.357

9.  Ultrasound-based estimation of remaining cardiac function in LVAD-supported ex vivo hearts.

Authors:  Louis S Fixsen; Niels J Petterson; Patrick Houthuizen; Marcel C M Rutten; Frans N van de Vosse; Richard G P Lopata
Journal:  Artif Organs       Date:  2020-04-18       Impact factor: 3.094

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.