Literature DB >> 19423271

Written informed-consent statutes and HIV testing.

Peter D Ehrenkranz1, José A Pagán, Elizabeth M Begier, Benjamin P Linas, Kristin Madison, Katrina Armstrong.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Almost 1 million Americans are infected with HIV, yet it is estimated that as many as 250,000 of them do not know their serostatus. This study examined whether people residing in states with statutes requiring written informed consent prior to HIV testing were less likely to report a recent HIV test.
METHODS: The study is based on survey data from the 2004 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. Logistic regression was used to assess the association between residence in a state with a pre-test written informed-consent requirement and individual self-report of recent HIV testing. The regression analyses controlled for potential state- and individual-level confounders.
RESULTS: Almost 17% of respondents reported that they had been tested for HIV in the prior 12 months. Ten states had statutes requiring written informed consent prior to routine HIV testing; nine of those were analyzed in this study. After adjusting for other state- and individual-level factors, people who resided in these nine states were less likely to report a recent history of HIV testing (OR=0.85; 95% CI=0.80, 0.90). The average marginal effect was -0.02 (p<0.001, 95% CI=-0.03, -0.01); thus, written informed-consent statutes are associated with a 12% reduction in HIV testing from the baseline testing level of 17%. The association between a consent requirement and lack of testing was greatest among respondents who denied HIV risk factors, were non-Hispanic whites, or who had higher levels of education.
CONCLUSIONS: This study's findings suggest that the removal of written informed-consent requirements might promote the non-risk-based routine-testing approach that the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) advocates in its new testing guidelines.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19423271      PMCID: PMC2800306          DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2009.03.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Prev Med        ISSN: 0749-3797            Impact factor:   5.043


  28 in total

1.  Driving the epidemic underground? A new look at law and the social risk of HIV testing.

Authors:  S Burris
Journal:  AIDS Public Policy J       Date:  1997

2.  Public health policy and the AIDS epidemic. An end to HIV exceptionalism?

Authors:  R Bayer
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1991-05-23       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Association between rates of HIV testing and elimination of written consents in San Francisco.

Authors:  Nicola M Zetola; Jeffrey D Klausner; Barbara Haller; Patricia Nassos; Mitchell H Katz
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2007-03-14       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Trillion virion delay: time from testing positive for HIV to presentation for primary care.

Authors:  J H Samet; K A Freedberg; M D Stein; R Lewis; J Savetsky; L Sullivan; S M Levenson; R Hingson
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1998-04-13

5.  The relationship of 1988 state HIV testing policies to previous and planned voluntary use of HIV testing.

Authors:  K A Phillips
Journal:  J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr (1988)       Date:  1994-04

6.  Human immunodeficiency virus counseling and testing practices among North Carolina providers.

Authors:  Karen Troccoli; Harold Pollard; Michael McMahon; Evelyn Foust; Kristine Erickson; Jay Schulkin
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 7.661

Review 7.  Current Centers for Disease Control and Prevention guidelines for HIV counseling, testing, and referral: critical role of and a call to action for emergency physicians.

Authors:  Richard E Rothman
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 5.721

8.  Recommendations for HIV testing services for inpatients and outpatients in acute-care hospital settings. Center for Disease Control and Prevention.

Authors: 
Journal:  MMWR Recomm Rep       Date:  1993-01-15

9.  Assessment of emergency department health care professionals' behaviors regarding HIV testing and referral for patients with STDs.

Authors:  Melissa Fincher-Mergi; Kathy Jo Cartone; Jean Mischler; Patricia Pasieka; E Brooke Lerner; Anthony J Billittier
Journal:  AIDS Patient Care STDS       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 5.078

10.  Assessing missed opportunities for HIV testing in medical settings.

Authors:  Rebecca V Liddicoat; Nicholas J Horton; Renata Urban; Elizabeth Maier; Demian Christiansen; Jeffrey H Samet
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 5.128

View more
  7 in total

1.  HIV testing of tuberculosis patients by public and private providers in New York City.

Authors:  Pamela W Klein; Tiffany G Harris; Peter A Leone; Audrey E Pettifor
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2014-06

2.  HIV screening practices in U.S. hospitals, 2009-2010.

Authors:  Andrew C Voetsch; James D Heffelfinger; Juliet Yonek; Pragna Patel; Steven F Ethridge; Gretchen W Torres; Margaret A Lampe; Bernard M Branson
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2012 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.792

Review 3.  Epidemiology of HIV infection in the United States: implications for linkage to care.

Authors:  Richard D Moore
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2011-01-15       Impact factor: 9.079

4.  Need to improve routine HIV testing of U.S. Veterans in care: results of an Internet survey.

Authors:  Ronald O Valdiserri; Kim Nazi; D Keith McInnes; David Ross; Linda Kinsinger
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2010-06

5.  Human immunodeficiency virus testing behaviors among US adults: the roles of individual factors, legislative status, and public health resources.

Authors:  Ping Du; Fabian Camacho; John Zurlo; Eugene J Lengerich
Journal:  Sex Transm Dis       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 2.830

6.  HIV testing trends: Southeastern Pennsylvania, 2002-2010.

Authors:  Florence Momplaisir; Baligh R Yehia; Michael O Harhay; Bradley Fetzer; Kathleen A Brady; Judith A Long
Journal:  AIDS Patient Care STDS       Date:  2014-04-17       Impact factor: 5.078

7.  Comparing Routine HIV and Hepatitis C Virus Screening to Estimate the Effect of Required Consent on HIV Screening Rates Among Hospitalized Patients.

Authors:  Uriel R Felsen; Aileen Tlamsa; Lorlette Moir; Shuchin Shukla; Devin Thompson; Jeffrey M Weiss; Moonseong Heo; Alain H Litwin
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2021-03-05       Impact factor: 2.792

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.