Literature DB >> 19423060

Essure: a review six years later.

Viviane F Connor1.   

Abstract

Hysteroscopic sterilization is rapidly replacing interval laparoscopic sterilization. Six years after the Food and Drug Administration's approval of Essure hysteroscopic sterilization, U.S. and worldwide literature and clinical experience have confirmed the safety, effectiveness, and low rate of adverse events reported in clinical trials. Essure is highly successful, with a 5-year effectiveness rate of 99.8%, and review of the unintended failures reveals that most can be traced to protocol deviation. The procedure is well tolerated in the office, with high successful bilateral placement rates and high patient satisfaction. Compliance and technical issues with the 3-month confirmation test are prevalent. Clinical results are consistent with the Phase II and III clinical trials, and long-term changes such as pelvic pain and abnormal bleeding are infrequent. Concomitant endometrial ablation is feasible and effective; however, long-term data are needed. Practitioners will encounter these real-world issues as they increasingly perform this procedure, and suggestions for management are provided.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19423060     DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2009.02.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Minim Invasive Gynecol        ISSN: 1553-4650            Impact factor:   4.137


  11 in total

1.  Transcervical sterilization: a comparison of essure(r) permanent birth control system and adiana(r) permanent contraception system.

Authors:  Sophia N Palmer; James A Greenberg
Journal:  Rev Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2009

2.  Incidence and risk factors for chronic pelvic pain after hysteroscopic sterilization.

Authors:  Amanda C Yunker; Jessica M B Ritch; Erica F Robinson; Cara T Golish
Journal:  J Minim Invasive Gynecol       Date:  2014-06-19       Impact factor: 4.137

3.  A review of clinical data for currently approved hysteroscopic sterilization procedures.

Authors:  Cindy M Basinski
Journal:  Rev Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2010

Review 4.  Techniques for the interruption of tubal patency for female sterilisation.

Authors:  Theresa A Lawrie; Regina Kulier; Juan Manuel Nardin
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-08-05

5.  Tubal risk markers for failure to place transcervical sterilization coils.

Authors:  Ophra Leyser-Whalen; Mahta Rouhani; Mahbubur Rahman; Abbey B Berenson
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2011-10-27       Impact factor: 3.375

6.  Hysterosalpingogram: an essential examination following Essure hysteroscopic sterilisation.

Authors:  V Shah; N Panay; R Williamson; A Hemingway
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2010-12-01       Impact factor: 3.039

7.  Control and constraint for low-income women choosing outpatient sterilization.

Authors:  Ophra Leyser-Whalen; Abbey B Berenson
Journal:  Qual Health Res       Date:  2013-06-12

8.  Efficacy, safety, and patient acceptability of the Essure™ procedure.

Authors:  Collette R Lessard; Matthew R Hopkins
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2011-04-28       Impact factor: 2.711

9.  Safety and efficacy of hysteroscopic sterilization compared with laparoscopic sterilization: an observational cohort study.

Authors:  Jialin Mao; Samantha Pfeifer; Peter Schlegel; Art Sedrakyan
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2015-10-13

10.  Preprocedure patient preferences and attitudes toward permanent contraceptive options.

Authors:  Hector O Chapa; Gonzalo Venegas
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2012-04-17       Impact factor: 2.711

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.