Literature DB >> 19422812

Cortical activity prior to predictable postural instability: is there a difference between self-initiated and externally-initiated perturbations?

George Mochizuki1, Kathryn M Sibley, Hannah J Cheung, William E McIlroy.   

Abstract

Previous work has revealed pre-perturbation cortical activity linked to predictably-timed perturbations to upright stability. Because individuals rely on the ability to anticipate perturbations for independent mobility, we sought to determine whether perturbation-evoked cortical potentials elicited by voluntarily-initiated external perturbations were dissociable from those elicited by externally-cued perturbations. Postural instability was evoked under three experimental conditions: cued external perturbations (EXT-CUE), cued self-initiated perturbations (SELF-CUE), and un-cued self-initiated perturbations (SELF-NO CUE). All conditions were characterized by comparable pre-perturbation slow-wave potentials initiated 1536.83+/-44.94 ms prior to perturbation onset, measuring 11.24+/-0.94 microV in amplitude. There were no differences in pre-perturbation cortical activity across tasks. Post-perturbation N1 potentials were also evoked, reaching peak amplitude at 132.63+/-3.40 ms following perturbation onset. The potentials were significantly larger in the EXT-CUE (17.08+/-2.99 microV) condition than both the SELF-CUE (11.98+/-2.53 microV) and SELF-NO CUE conditions (9.24+/-1.79 microV). There were no significant differences across tasks for measures of tibialis anterior muscle activity prior to or following perturbation onset, nor were there significant differences in centre of pressure excursion amplitude across tasks. This study highlights that despite using different mechanisms to initiate temporally predictable perturbations to upright stability, pre-perturbation cortical events with similar spatio-temporal characteristics and magnitude are evoked, signalling consistency in the cortical processes that optimize compensatory postural responses which are independent from the cues that inform the onset of postural instability. These findings enhance the understanding of cortical involvement in postural control.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19422812     DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2009.04.050

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Res        ISSN: 0006-8993            Impact factor:   3.252


  12 in total

1.  Loss of balance during balance beam walking elicits a multifocal theta band electrocortical response.

Authors:  Amy R Sipp; Joseph T Gwin; Scott Makeig; Daniel P Ferris
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-08-07       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Effects of amplitude cueing on postural responses and preparatory cortical activity of people with Parkinson disease.

Authors:  Beth A Smith; Jesse V Jacobs; Fay B Horak
Journal:  J Neurol Phys Ther       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 3.649

3.  Effects of speed and direction of perturbation on electroencephalographic and balance responses.

Authors:  Rahul Goel; Recep A Ozdemir; Sho Nakagome; Jose L Contreras-Vidal; William H Paloski; Pranav J Parikh
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-05-11       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Neural mechanisms and functional correlates of altered postural responses to perturbed standing balance with chronic low back pain.

Authors:  Jesse V Jacobs; Carrie L Roy; Juvena R Hitt; Roman E Popov; Sharon M Henry
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2016-10-19       Impact factor: 3.590

Review 5.  Do sensorimotor perturbations to standing balance elicit an error-related negativity?

Authors:  Aiden M Payne; Lena H Ting; Greg Hajcak
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2019-03-01       Impact factor: 4.016

6.  Balance perturbation-evoked cortical N1 responses are larger when stepping and not influenced by motor planning.

Authors:  Aiden M Payne; Lena H Ting
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2020-10-14       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 7.  Neuroimaging of Human Balance Control: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Ellen Wittenberg; Jessica Thompson; Chang S Nam; Jason R Franz
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2017-04-10       Impact factor: 3.169

8.  Corticospinal Excitability Is Modulated as a Function of Postural Perturbation Predictability.

Authors:  Kimiya Fujio; Hiroki Obata; Taku Kitamura; Noritaka Kawashima; Kimitaka Nakazawa
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2018-02-27       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  Cortical responses to whole-body balance perturbations index perturbation magnitude and predict reactive stepping behavior.

Authors:  Teodoro Solis-Escalante; Mitchel Stokkermans; Michael X Cohen; Vivian Weerdesteyn
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2020-09-20       Impact factor: 3.698

10.  Sympathetic Response to Postural Perturbation in Stance.

Authors:  Taku Kawasaki; Hitoshi Oda; Yasushi Sawaguchi; Hiroshi Kunimura; Koichi Hiraoka
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2021-12-10       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.