Literature DB >> 19422629

Direct risk aversion: evidence from risky prospects valued below their worst outcome.

Uri Simonsohn1.   

Abstract

Why would people pay more for a $50 gift certificate than for the opportunity to receive a gift certificate worth either $50 or $100, with equal probability? This article examines three possible mechanisms for this recently documented uncertainty effect (UE): First, awareness of the better outcome may devalue the worse one. Second, the UE may have arisen in the original demonstration of this effect because participants misunderstood the instructions. Third, the UE may be due to direct risk aversion, that is, actual distaste for uncertainty. In Experiment 1, the UE was observed even though participants in the certainty condition were also aware of the better outcome; this result eliminates the first explanation. Experiment 2 shows that most participants understand the instructions used in the original study and that the UE is not caused by the few who do not. Overall, the experiments demonstrate that the UE is robust, large (prospects are valued at 65% of the value of the worse outcome), and widespread (at least 62% of participants exhibit it).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19422629     DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02349.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Sci        ISSN: 0956-7976


  2 in total

1.  Dual Processes in Decision Making and Developmental Neuroscience: A Fuzzy-Trace Model.

Authors:  Valerie F Reyna; Charles J Brainerd
Journal:  Dev Rev       Date:  2011-09

2.  The Role of Health Concerns in Phishing Susceptibility: Survey Design Study.

Authors:  Mohamed Abdelhamid
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2020-05-04       Impact factor: 5.428

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.