Literature DB >> 19421883

An implementation plan for using biological indicators to improve assessment of water quality in Thailand.

Boonsatien Boonsoong1, Narumon Sangpradub, Michael T Barbour, Wijarn Simachaya.   

Abstract

Most national standards for assessment of water quality include physical and chemical indicators relevant to specific pollutants and stressors. However, biological communities reflect not only current conditions of aquatic resources but also change in conditions over time and impacts from multiple stressors. Assessing the health of the aquatic community (that is, bioassessments) has proven to be critical in protecting and maintaining healthy surface waters under the mandates of regulatory frameworks, such as the Clean Water Act in the USA and the Water Framework Directive of the European Union. Whereas, in Thailand water standards, bioassessment is lacking in favor of chemical criteria, only coliform bacteria measurement can be considered a surrogate biological parameter. Our paper argues that incorporating bioassessment will improve water resource condition evaluations and recommends the use of the benthic macroinvertebrate assemblage as a bioassessment framework in Thailand. We discuss the implementation of a bioassessment program that consists of two major components, (a) a scientifically valid technical approach and (b) consideration of technical resources for a cost-effective program. The technical design comprises (1) classification of streams into similar groupings, (2) design of a biological survey, (3) a well-documented sampling protocol, (4) calibration of biological metrics for data analysis, (5) development of criteria for determination of ecological condition, and (6) communication of the results to citizens and policymakers. A cost-effective way to develop a bioassessment program that will improve Thailand's ability to measure water quality and to make good decisions to attain healthy quality status is to establish partnerships by coordinating efforts and sharing data and technology with adjacent regional environmental offices or provinces. This collaboration would be fostered through a long-term national water resources management strategy and clear definition of goals and desired outcomes that are critical components of the overall National Plan for Ecological Health.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19421883     DOI: 10.1007/s10661-009-0939-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Monit Assess        ISSN: 0167-6369            Impact factor:   2.513


  5 in total

1.  Volunteer environmental monitoring and the role of the universities: the case of Citizens' Environment Watch.

Authors:  Beth Savan; Alexis J Morgan; Christopher Gore
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 3.266

2.  Setting expectations for the ecological condition of streams: the concept of reference condition.

Authors:  John L Stoddard; David P Larsen; Charles P Hawkins; Richard K Johnson; Richard H Norris
Journal:  Ecol Appl       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 4.657

3.  The biological condition gradient: a descriptive model for interpreting change in aquatic ecosystems.

Authors:  Susan P Davies; Susan K Jackson
Journal:  Ecol Appl       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 4.657

4.  Which group is best? Attributes of different biological assemblages used in freshwater biomonitoring programs.

Authors:  Vincent H Resh
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2007-05-15       Impact factor: 2.513

5.  Development of rapid bioassessment approaches using benthic macroinvertebrates for Thai streams.

Authors:  Boonsatien Boonsoong; Narumon Sangpradub; Michael T Barbour
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2008-07-17       Impact factor: 2.513

  5 in total
  1 in total

1.  Habitat as architecture: integrating conservation planning and human health.

Authors:  Robert F Baldwin; Robert B Powell; Stephen R Kellert
Journal:  Ambio       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 5.129

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.