PURPOSE: Since the discovery of cancer cells with stem-like characteristics in hematopoietic malignancies and, more recently, in solid tumors, enormous attention has been paid to the stem-cell nature of pancreatic cancer. Among the most important properties of cancer stem cells their high capacity for tumorigenicity as well as their ability to metastasize is under special research interest today. METHODS: Here, we give a brief overview of main components used to confirm the stem-cell-like behavior of putative cancer stem cells and discuss markers and methods for identifying them in pancreatic cancer. Finally, the review provides some new suggestions as to how specifically target these cells and improve current therapy regimens. RESULTS: The cancer stem-cell hypothesis is a fundamentally different model of carcinogenesis composed of two separate but dependent on each other characteristics of stem cells--aberrant activation of their tightly regulated processes of self-renewal and differentiation and their resistance towards chemo- and radiotherapy. The cancer stem cells may further be identified based on their expression of cell surface markers or their functional characteristics. The concept of molecular targeting of such highly tumorigenic cancer cells aimed to sensitize tumors toward conventional therapies and effectively abrogate tumor growth and metastasis. CONCLUSIONS: The presence of cancer stem cells in pancreatic tumors has prognostic relevance and influences therapeutic response. Evidence suggests that metastatic potential may be conferred to these highly tumorigenic cells as well. A better understanding of the biological behavior of these cells may further improve therapeutic approaches and outcomes in patients with this devastating disease.
PURPOSE: Since the discovery of cancer cells with stem-like characteristics in hematopoietic malignancies and, more recently, in solid tumors, enormous attention has been paid to the stem-cell nature of pancreatic cancer. Among the most important properties of cancer stem cells their high capacity for tumorigenicity as well as their ability to metastasize is under special research interest today. METHODS: Here, we give a brief overview of main components used to confirm the stem-cell-like behavior of putative cancer stem cells and discuss markers and methods for identifying them in pancreatic cancer. Finally, the review provides some new suggestions as to how specifically target these cells and improve current therapy regimens. RESULTS: The cancer stem-cell hypothesis is a fundamentally different model of carcinogenesis composed of two separate but dependent on each other characteristics of stem cells--aberrant activation of their tightly regulated processes of self-renewal and differentiation and their resistance towards chemo- and radiotherapy. The cancer stem cells may further be identified based on their expression of cell surface markers or their functional characteristics. The concept of molecular targeting of such highly tumorigenic cancer cells aimed to sensitize tumors toward conventional therapies and effectively abrogate tumor growth and metastasis. CONCLUSIONS: The presence of cancer stem cells in pancreatic tumors has prognostic relevance and influences therapeutic response. Evidence suggests that metastatic potential may be conferred to these highly tumorigenic cells as well. A better understanding of the biological behavior of these cells may further improve therapeutic approaches and outcomes in patients with this devastating disease.
Authors: Michael F Clarke; John E Dick; Peter B Dirks; Connie J Eaves; Catriona H M Jamieson; D Leanne Jones; Jane Visvader; Irving L Weissman; Geoffrey M Wahl Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2006-09-21 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Tobias Schatton; George F Murphy; Natasha Y Frank; Kazuhiro Yamaura; Ana Maria Waaga-Gasser; Martin Gasser; Qian Zhan; Stefan Jordan; Lyn M Duncan; Carsten Weishaupt; Robert C Fuhlbrigge; Thomas S Kupper; Mohamed H Sayegh; Markus H Frank Journal: Nature Date: 2008-01-17 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Chenwei Li; David G Heidt; Piero Dalerba; Charles F Burant; Lanjing Zhang; Volkan Adsay; Max Wicha; Michael F Clarke; Diane M Simeone Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2007-02-01 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Hany Kayed; Jörg Kleeff; Shereen Keleg; Junchau Guo; Knut Ketterer; Pascal O Berberat; Nathalia Giese; Irene Esposito; Thomas Giese; Markus W Büchler; Helmut Friess Journal: Int J Cancer Date: 2004-07-10 Impact factor: 7.396
Authors: Christopher J Shepherd; Siân Rizzo; Ioanna Ledaki; Melissa Davies; Daniel Brewer; Gerhardt Attard; Johann de Bono; David L Hudson Journal: Prostate Date: 2008-06-15 Impact factor: 4.104
Authors: Piero Dalerba; Scott J Dylla; In-Kyung Park; Rui Liu; Xinhao Wang; Robert W Cho; Timothy Hoey; Austin Gurney; Emina H Huang; Diane M Simeone; Andrew A Shelton; Giorgio Parmiani; Chiara Castelli; Michael F Clarke Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2007-06-04 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Lesley A Mathews; Stephanie M Cabarcas; Elaine M Hurt; Xiaohu Zhang; Elizabeth M Jaffee; William L Farrar Journal: Pancreas Date: 2011-07 Impact factor: 3.327
Authors: L V Klotz; M E Eichhorn; B Schwarz; H Seeliger; M K Angele; K-W Jauch; Christiane J Bruns Journal: Langenbecks Arch Surg Date: 2012-03-14 Impact factor: 3.445
Authors: Sripathi M Sureban; Randal May; Stan A Lightfoot; Aimee B Hoskins; Megan Lerner; Daniel J Brackett; Russell G Postier; Rama Ramanujam; Altaf Mohammed; Chinthalapally V Rao; James H Wyche; Shrikant Anant; Courtney W Houchen Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2011-02-01 Impact factor: 12.701