| Literature DB >> 19421341 |
Shinobu Mori1, Mayumi Satou, Satoshi Kanazawa, Naonobu Yoshizuka, Tadashi Hase, Ichiro Tokimitsu, Yoshinori Takema, Yoshinori Nishizawa, Toshihiko Yada.
Abstract
We have found natural products exhibiting lipolysis-promoting activity in subcutaneous adipocytes, which are less sensitive to hormones than visceral adipocytes. The activities and a action mechanisms of a novel plant extract of Cirsium oligophyllum (CE) were investigated in isolated adipocytes from rat subcutaneous fat, and its fat-reducing effects by peroral administration and topical application were evaluated in vivo. CE-induced lipolysis was synergistically enhanced by caffeine, a phosphodiesterase inhibitor, and was reduced by propranolol, a beta adrenergic antagonist. The peroral administration of 10% CE solution to Wistar rats for 32 days reduced body weight gain, subcutaneous, and visceral fat weights by 6.6, 26.2, and 3.0%, respectively, as compared to the control group. By the topical application of 2% of this extract to rats for 7 days, weight of subcutaneous fat in the treated skin was reduced by 23.2%. This fat mass reduction was accompanied by the up-regulation of uncoupling protein 1 (UCP), a principal thermogenic mitochondrial molecule related to energy dissipating, in subcutaneous fat and UCP3 in skin except for the fat layer. These results indicate that CE promotes lipolysis via a mechanism involving the beta adrenergic receptor, and affects the body fat mass. This fat reduction may be partially due to UCP up-regulation in the skin including subcutaneous fat. This is the first report showing that repeated lipolysis promotion through CE administration may be beneficial for the systematic suppression of body fat accumulation or the control of fat distribution in obesity.Entities:
Keywords: fat reduction; lipolysis; plant extract; uncoupling protein; β adrenergic receptor
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2009 PMID: 19421341 PMCID: PMC2677732 DOI: 10.7150/ijbs.5.311
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Biol Sci ISSN: 1449-2288 Impact factor: 6.580
Fig 1Promotion of lipolysis by CE and NA. Adipocytes were isolated from subcutaneous fat pads and treated with CE or NA for 120 min, and released glycerol was measured. Each value represents the mean ± S.E.M. of three incubation tubes for each condition.
Fig 2Promotion of lipolysis by CE with caffeine or NA. Adipocytes were isolated from subcutaneous fat pads and treated with CE and caffeine (0.1 mM) or NA (0.1μg/ml) for 120 min, and released glycerol was measured. Short dashed line represents level of Caf or NA treatment. Each value represents the mean ± S.E.M. of three incubation tubes for each condition.
Fig 3Promotion of lipolysis by CE with propranolol. Adipocytes were isolated from subcutaneous fat pads and treated with CE and propranolol (0.1 μM) for 120 min, and released glycerol was measured. Each value represents the mean ± S.E.M. of three incubation tubes for each condition.
Fig 4Body weight changes by the peroral administration of CE. Wistar rats perorally received water (control group) or 3 or 10% CE solution twice daily for 32 days. Each value represents the mean ± S.E.M. of eight animals for each group. *: P<0.05, compared with the value of the control group.
Changes in food intake, body weight, and adipose tissue weight by the peroral administration of CE. Wistar rats perorally received water (control group) or 3 or 10% CE solution twice daily for 32 days. Each value represents the mean ± S.E.M. of eight animals for each group. *: P<0.05, compared with the value of the control.
| Total Food Intake (g) | Final Body Weight (g) | Subcutaneous Fat Weight (g) | Visceral Fat Weight (g) | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Concentration (%) | Mean | SEM | Relative Value | Mean | SEM | Relative Value | Mean | SEM | Relative Value | Mean | SEM | Relative Value | ||||
| 0 (Control) | 847.4 | 33.3 | 100.0 | 389.8 | 6.4 | 100.0 | 8.000 | 0.440 | 100.0 | 8.30 | 0.35 | 100.0 | ||||
| 3 | 850.1 | 33.0 | 100.3 | 372.3 | 7.7 | 95.5 | * | 7.100 | 0.350 | 88.8 | * | 8.18 | 0.36 | 98.6 | * | |
| 10 | 829.8 | 34.1 | 97.9 | 364.0 | 4.4 | 93.4 | * | 5.900 | 0.370 | 73.8 | * | 8.05 | 0.40 | 97.0 | * | |
Changes in food intake, body weight, and adipose tissue weight by the topical application of CE. Wistar rats were externally applied with water (control group) or CE solution twice daily for 7 days. Each value represents the mean ± S.E.M. of eight animals for each group. *: P<0.05, compared with the value of the control.
| Total Food Intake (g) | Final Body Weight (g) | Subcutaneous Fat Weight (g) | Visceral Fat Weight (g) | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Conc (%) | Mean | SEM | Relative % | Mean | SEM | Relative % | Mean | SEM | Relative % | Mean | SEM | Relative % | |||
| 0 (Control) | 190.2 | 20.5 | 100.0 | 161.0 | 9.1 | 100.0 | 0.322 | 0.076 | 100.0 | 1.031 | 0.108 | 100.0 | |||
| 0.05 | 189.1 | 22.3 | 99.4 | 160.7 | 7.5 | 99.8 | 0.314 | 0.034 | 97.5 | 1.031 | 0.180 | 100.0 | |||
| 0.2 | 192.4 | 18.9 | 101.2 | 162.5 | 5.8 | 100.9 | 0.261 | 0.040 | 81.3 | 1.018 | 0.193 | 98.8 | |||
| 0.5 | 185.8 | 20.1 | 97.7 | 164.6 | 4.6 | 102.2 | 0.257 | 0.018 | 80.0 | * | 0.997 | 0.155 | 96.8 | ||
| 1 | 191.9 | 22.0 | 100.9 | 161.8 | 8.7 | 100.5 | 0.241 | 0.009 | 75.0 | * | 1.005 | 0.129 | 97.5 | ||
| 2 | 190.7 | 17.8 | 100.3 | 164.2 | 2.6 | 102.0 | 0.247 | 0.019 | 76.8 | * | 0.967 | 0.155 | 93.8 | ||
Fig 5Changes in UCP expression in subcutaneous fat (a) and the superficial skin (b) by the topical application of CE. Wistar rats were externally applied with water (control group) or 0.5% CE solution twice daily for 7 days. WAT represents white adipose tissue of subcutaneous fat, compared to BAT. Each value represents the mean ± S.E.M. of eight animals for each group relative to the control group. *: P<0.05, compared with the value of the control group.