Literature DB >> 19420360

Does comparative-effectiveness research threaten personalized medicine?

Alan M Garber1, Sean R Tunis.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  2009        PMID： 19420360     DOI： 10.1056/NEJMp0901355

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  N Engl J Med        ISSN： 0028-4793            Impact factor:   91.245


× No keyword cloud information.
  61 in total

Review 1.  Comparative Effectiveness Research in Pediatric Respiratory Disease: Promise and Pitfalls.

Authors:  Kathleen J Ramos; Ranjani Somayaji; David P Nichols; Christopher H Goss
Journal:  Paediatr Drugs       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 3.022

2.  HETEROGENEITY IN TREATMENT EFFECT AND COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS RESEARCH.

Authors:  Zhehui Luo
Journal:  China Health Rev       Date:  2011-10

3.  Acupuncture for migraine prophylaxis: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Ying Li; Hui Zheng; Claudia M Witt; Stephanie Roll; Shu-guang Yu; Jie Yan; Guo-jie Sun; Ling Zhao; Wen-jing Huang; Xiao-rong Chang; Hong-xing Zhang; De-jun Wang; Lei Lan; Ran Zou; Fan-rong Liang
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2012-01-09       Impact factor: 8.262

4.  A population approach to precision medicine.

Authors:  Muin J Khoury; Marta L Gwinn; Russell E Glasgow; Barnett S Kramer
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 5.043

5.  What have we learned about trial design from NIMH-funded pragmatic trials?

Authors:  John March; Helena C Kraemer; Madhukar Trivedi; John Csernansky; John Davis; Terence A Ketter; Ira D Glick
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2010-08-25       Impact factor: 7.853

6.  Comparative effectiveness, personalized medicine and innovation: the path forward.

Authors:  Adrian Thomas; Audrey Phillips; Robert Donnelly; Catherine Tak Piech
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 4.981

7.  Extraperitoneal rectal cancer: why laparoscopic may be more effective than open surgery.

Authors:  John Spiliotis; Odysseas Zoras
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 8.  Comparative effectiveness research in urology.

Authors:  Amy T Wang; Jeffrey K Wang; Victor M Montori; Mohammad Hassan Murad
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2010-12-28       Impact factor: 4.226

9.  A two-stage Bayesian design with sample size reestimation and subgroup analysis for phase II binary response trials.

Authors:  Wei Zhong; Joseph S Koopmeiners; Bradley P Carlin
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2013-04-11       Impact factor: 2.226

Review 10.  Decision making about cancer screening: an assessment of the state of the science and a suggested research agenda from the ASPO Behavioral Oncology and Cancer Communication Special Interest Group.

Authors:  Marc T Kiviniemi; Jennifer L Hay; Aimee S James; Isaac M Lipkus; Helen I Meissner; Michael Stefanek; Jamie L Studts; John F P Bridges; David R Close; Deborah O Erwin; Resa M Jones; Karen Kaiser; Kathryn M Kash; Kimberly M Kelly; Simon J Craddock Lee; Jason Q Purnell; Laura A Siminoff; Susan T Vadaparampil; Catharine Wang
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 4.254
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.