Literature DB >> 19420265

The basal forebrain cholinergic system is required specifically for behaviorally mediated cortical map plasticity.

Dhakshin Ramanathan1, Mark H Tuszynski, James M Conner.   

Abstract

The basal forebrain cholinergic system has been implicated in the reorganization of adult cortical sensory and motor representations under many, but not all, experimental conditions. It is still not fully understood which types of plasticity require the cholinergic system and which do not. In this study, we examine the hypothesis that the basal forebrain cholinergic system is required for eliciting plasticity associated with complex cognitive processing (e.g., behavioral experiences that drive cortical reorganization) but is not required for plasticity mediated under behaviorally independent conditions. We used established experimental manipulations to elicit two distinct forms of plasticity within the motor cortex: facial nerve transections evoke reorganization of cortical motor representations independent of behavioral experience, and skilled forelimb training induces behaviorally dependent expansion of forelimb motor representations. In animals that underwent skilled forelimb training in conjunction with a facial nerve lesion, cholinergic mechanisms were required for mediating the behaviorally dependent plasticity associated with the skilled motor training but were not necessary for mediating plasticity associated with the facial nerve transection. These results dissociate the contribution of cholinergic mechanisms to distinct forms of cortical plasticity and support the hypothesis that the forebrain cholinergic system is selectively required for modulating complex forms of cortical plasticity driven by behavioral experience.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19420265      PMCID: PMC6665226          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0230-09.2009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  41 in total

Review 1.  Structural plasticity upon learning: regulation and functions.

Authors:  Pico Caroni; Flavio Donato; Dominique Muller
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2012-06-20       Impact factor: 34.870

2.  Visual attentional load influences plasticity in the human motor cortex.

Authors:  Marc R Kamke; Michelle G Hall; Hayley F Lye; Martin V Sale; Laura R Fenlon; Timothy J Carroll; Stephan Riek; Jason B Mattingley
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-05-16       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Unique contributions of distinct cholinergic projections to motor cortical plasticity and learning.

Authors:  J M Conner; M Kulczycki; M H Tuszynski
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2010-02-24       Impact factor: 5.357

4.  Vagus Nerve Stimulation Delivered with Motor Training Enhances Recovery of Function after Traumatic Brain Injury.

Authors:  David T Pruitt; Ariel N Schmid; Lily J Kim; Caroline M Abe; Jenny L Trieu; Connie Choua; Seth A Hays; Michael P Kilgard; Robert L Rennaker
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2015-08-05       Impact factor: 5.269

5.  Cholinergic systems are essential for late-stage maturation and refinement of motor cortical circuits.

Authors:  Dhakshin S Ramanathan; James M Conner; Arjun A Anilkumar; Mark H Tuszynski
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2014-12-10       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Acetylcholine excites neocortical pyramidal neurons via nicotinic receptors.

Authors:  Tristan Hedrick; Jack Waters
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-01-14       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Rehabilitation drives enhancement of neuronal structure in functionally relevant neuronal subsets.

Authors:  Ling Wang; James M Conner; Alan H Nagahara; Mark H Tuszynski
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-02-22       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Modulation of high- and low-frequency components of the cortical local field potential via nicotinic and muscarinic acetylcholine receptors in anesthetized mice.

Authors:  Abigail Kalmbach; Jack Waters
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-10-23       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  An automated behavioral box to assess forelimb function in rats.

Authors:  Chelsea C Wong; Dhakshin S Ramanathan; Tanuj Gulati; Seok Joon Won; Karunesh Ganguly
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2015-03-10       Impact factor: 2.390

10.  Long-term relationships between cholinergic tone, synchronous bursting and synaptic remodeling.

Authors:  Maya Kaufman; Michael A Corner; Noam E Ziv
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-07-23       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.