Literature DB >> 19419837

A systematic review examining the literature on attitudes of patients with advanced cancer toward research.

Anne M H Todd1, Barry J A Laird, Dorothy Boyle, Angela C Boyd, Lesley A Colvin, Marie T Fallon.   

Abstract

The attitudes of heterogeneous groups of cancer patients towards research have been studied extensively. Less is known about these attitudes in the advanced cancer population. Such patients may have differing attitudes for a variety of reasons, including burden of disease and social factors. This systematic review examines the literature on attitudes of patients with advanced cancer toward research and aims to define common themes. The following databases were searched electronically: CINAHL (1982-2007), the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (2007), Embase (1996-2007), and Medline (1996-2007). Additionally, the following journals were hand searched: Palliative Medicine, Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, and the European Journal of Palliative Care. The search terminologies used were: "Cancer" AND "Attitudes" AND "Research" AND "Palliative Care." All subheadings were included. Results were limited to English-language journals and studies involving humans. Of the 637 articles retrieved, 11 were included after an appraisal process. Both positive and negative attitudes toward research in advanced cancer were identified. Common themes of altruism, hope, and self-benefit were identified in 10 studies as a motivation for trial participation. Negative attitudes toward symptom control and risk of increased hospital admissions were identified in four studies. Most of the studies involved patients' views about participating in hypothetical trials, limiting the generalizability of results. An important step for future work would be to examine the experiences and opinions of patients with advanced cancer who have actually participated in a clinical trial.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19419837     DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2008.07.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage        ISSN: 0885-3924            Impact factor:   3.612


  9 in total

1.  Small Social Incentives Did Not Improve the Survey Response Rate of Patients Who Underwent Orthopaedic Surgery: A Randomized Trial.

Authors:  Hunter Warwick; Carolyn Hutyra; Cary Politzer; Andrew Francis; Thomas Risoli; Cynthia Green; Nikhil Verma; Scott Huettel; Richard C Mather
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 2.  Ethical challenges and solutions regarding delirium studies in palliative care.

Authors:  Lisa Sweet; Dimitrios Adamis; David J Meagher; Daniel Davis; David C Currow; Shirley H Bush; Christopher Barnes; Michael Hartwick; Meera Agar; Jessica Simon; William Breitbart; Neil MacDonald; Peter G Lawlor
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2013-12-31       Impact factor: 3.612

3.  Patient-doctor agreement on recall of clinical trial discussion across cultures.

Authors:  J Bernhard; J Aldridge; P N Butow; P Zoller; R Brown; A Smith; I Juraskova
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2012-09-27       Impact factor: 32.976

4.  Barriers and facilitators to the participation of subjects in clinical trials: An overview of reviews.

Authors:  Edgardo Rodríguez-Torres; Margarita M González-Pérez; Clemente Díaz-Pérez
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials Commun       Date:  2021-08-03

5.  Impact and costs of incentives to reduce attrition in online trials: two randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Zarnie Khadjesari; Elizabeth Murray; Eleftheria Kalaitzaki; Ian R White; Jim McCambridge; Simon G Thompson; Paul Wallace; Christine Godfrey
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2011-03-02       Impact factor: 5.428

6.  Symptom Control Trials in Patients With Advanced Cancer: A Qualitative Study.

Authors:  Tom Middlemiss; Mari Lloyd-Williams; Barry J Laird; Marie T Fallon
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2015-05-29       Impact factor: 3.612

7.  Patient, caregiver, health professional and researcher views and experiences of participating in research at the end of life: a critical interpretive synthesis of the literature.

Authors:  Marjolein H Gysels; Catherine Evans; Irene J Higginson
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2012-08-17       Impact factor: 4.615

8.  "I didn't really understand it, I just thought it'd help": exploring the motivations, understandings and experiences of patients with advanced lung cancer participating in a non-placebo clinical IMP trial.

Authors:  Emily Harrop; Simon Noble; Michelle Edwards; Stephanie Sivell; Barbara Moore; Annmarie Nelson
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2016-07-20       Impact factor: 2.279

9.  Factors affecting recruitment to an observational multicentre palliative care study.

Authors:  Patrick C Stone; Bridget Gwilliam; Vaughan Keeley; Chris Todd; Laura C Kelly; Stephen Barclay
Journal:  BMJ Support Palliat Care       Date:  2013-01-07       Impact factor: 3.568

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.