Literature DB >> 19419820

The role of dual-time combined 18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography and computed tomography in the staging and restaging workup of locally advanced rectal cancer, treated with preoperative chemoradiation therapy and radical surgery.

Carlo Capirci1, Domenico Rubello, Felice Pasini, Fabrizio Galeotti, Enzo Bianchini, Giuseppe Del Favero, Riccardo Panzavolta, Giorgio Crepaldi, Lucia Rampin, Enzo Facci, Marcello Gava, Elena Banti, Gianfranco Marano.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: In patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) staging and, after preoperative chemo-radiation therapy (CRT), restaging workup could be useful to tailor therapeutic approaches. Fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography ([(18)F]FDG-PET) is a promising tool for monitoring the effect of antitumor therapy. This study was aimed to evaluate the possible role of dual time sequential FDG-PET scans in the staging and restaging workup of LARC. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Eighty-seven consecutive patients with LARC were enrolled. CRT consisted of external-beam intensified radiotherapy (concurrent boost), with concomitant chemotherapy PVI 5-FU (300 mg/m(2)/day) followed 8-10 weeks later by surgery. All patients underwent [(18)F]FDG-PET/CT before and 5-6 weeks later after the completion of CRT. Measurements of FDG uptake (SUV(max)), and percentage of SUV(max) difference (Response Index = RI) between pre- and post-CRT [(18)F]FDG-PET scans were evaluated.
RESULTS: Six of 87 patients were excluded due to protocol deviation. Following CRT, 40/81 patients (49%) were classified as responders according to Mandard's criteria (TRG1-2). The mean pre-CRT SUV(max) was significantly higher than post-CRT (15.8, vs 5.9; p < 0.001). The mean RI was significantly higher in responders than in nonresponder patients (71.3% vs 38%; p = 0.0038). Using a RI cut-off of 65% for defining response to therapy, the following parameters have been obtained: 84.5% sensitivity, 80% specificity, 81.4% positive predictive value, 84.2% negative predictive value, and 81% overall accuracy.
CONCLUSION: These results suggest the potential role of [(18)F]FDG-PET in the restaging workup after preoperative CRT in LARC. RI seems the best predictor to identify CRT response.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19419820     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.10.064

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  17 in total

1.  Management of distal rectal cancer: results from a national survey.

Authors:  G Melotti; E De Antoni; A Habr-Gama; A Minicozzi
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2013-01-19

2.  Fifteen different 18F-FDG PET/CT qualitative and quantitative parameters investigated as pathological response predictors of locally advanced rectal cancer treated by neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy.

Authors:  Anna Margherita Maffione; Alice Ferretti; Gaia Grassetto; Elena Bellan; Carlo Capirci; Sotirios Chondrogiannis; Marcello Gava; Maria Cristina Marzola; Lucia Rampin; Claudia Bondesan; Patrick M Colletti; Domenico Rubello
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2013-02-16       Impact factor: 9.236

3.  Predicting complete response to neoadjuvant CRT for distal rectal cancer using sequential PET/CT imaging.

Authors:  R O Perez; A Habr-Gama; G P São Julião; P B Lynn; C Sabbagh; I Proscurshim; F G Campos; J Gama-Rodrigues; S C Nahas; C A Buchpiguel
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2014-02-08       Impact factor: 3.781

Review 4.  Beyond Histologic Staging: Emerging Imaging Strategies in Colorectal Cancer with Special Focus on Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

Authors:  Tyler J Fraum; Joseph W Owen; Kathryn J Fowler
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2016-09

5.  Value of diffusion-weighted imaging in the detection of viable tumour after neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer: comparison with T2 weighted and PET/CT imaging.

Authors:  I Song; S H Kim; S J Lee; J Y Choi; M J Kim; H Rhim
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2011-02-22       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 6.  The use of FDG-PET to target tumors by radiotherapy.

Authors:  Guido Lammering; Dirk De Ruysscher; Angela van Baardwijk; Brigitta G Baumert; Jacques Borger; Ludy Lutgens; Piet van den Ende; Michel Ollers; Philippe Lambin
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2010-08-30       Impact factor: 3.621

7.  Comparison of restaging accuracy of repeat FDG-PET/CT with pelvic MRI after preoperative chemoradiation in patients with rectal cancer.

Authors:  Jung Wook Huh; Seong Young Kwon; Jae Hyuk Lee; Hyeong Rok Kim
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-09-03       Impact factor: 4.553

8.  Laboratory blood data have a significant impact on tumor response and outcome in preoperative chemoradiotherapy for advanced rectal cancer.

Authors:  Koji Yasuda; Eiji Sunami; Kazushige Kawai; Hirokazu Nagawa; Joji Kitayama
Journal:  J Gastrointest Cancer       Date:  2012-06

Review 9.  Locally advanced rectal cancer: a comparison of management strategies.

Authors:  Robert Glynne-Jones; Miranda Kronfli
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2011-06-18       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 10.  How reliable is current imaging in restaging rectal cancer after neoadjuvant therapy?

Authors:  Paola De Nardi; Michele Carvello
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-09-28       Impact factor: 5.742

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.