Literature DB >> 19419444

The gingival biotype revisited: transparency of the periodontal probe through the gingival margin as a method to discriminate thin from thick gingiva.

Tim De Rouck1, Rouhollah Eghbali, Kristiaan Collys, Hugo De Bruyn, Jan Cosyn.   

Abstract

AIM: To detect groups of subjects in a sample of 100 periodontally healthy volunteers with different combinations of morphometric data related to central maxillary incisors and surrounding soft tissues.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Four clinical parameters were included in a cluster analysis: crown width/crown length ratio (CW/CL), gingival width (GW), papilla height (PH) and gingival thickness (GT). The latter was based on the transparency of the periodontal probe through the gingival margin while probing the buccal sulcus. Every first volunteer out of 10 was re-examined to evaluate intra-examiner repeatability for all variables.
RESULTS: High agreement between duplicate recordings was found for all parameters, in particular for GT, pointing to 85% (kappa=0.70; p=0.002). The partitioning method identified three clusters with specific features. Cluster A1 (nine males, 28 females) displayed a slender tooth form (CW/CL=0.79), a GW of 4.92 mm, a PH of 4.29 mm and a thin gingiva (probe visible on one or both incisors in 100% of the subjects). Cluster A2 (29 males, five females) presented similar features (CW/CL=0.77; GW=5.2 mm; PH=4.54 mm), except for GT. These subjects showed a clear thick gingiva (probe concealed on both incisors in 97% of the subjects). The third group (cluster B: 12 males, 17 females) differed substantially from the other clusters in many parameters. These subjects showed a more quadratic tooth form (CW/CL=0.88), a broad zone of keratinized tissue (GW=5.84 mm), low papillae (PH=2.84 mm) and a thick gingiva (probe concealed on both incisors in 83% of the subjects).
CONCLUSIONS: The present analysis, using a simple and reproducible method for GT assessment, confirmed the existence of gingival biotypes. A clear thin gingiva was found in about one-third of the sample in mainly female subjects with slender teeth, a narrow zone of keratinized tissue and a highly scalloped gingival margin corresponding to the features of the previously introduced "thin-scalloped biotype" (cluster A1). A clear thick gingiva was found in about two-thirds of the sample in mainly male subjects. About half of them showed quadratic teeth, a broad zone of keratinized tissue and a flat gingival margin corresponding to the features of the previously introduced "thick-flat biotype" (cluster B). The other half could not be classified as such. These subjects showed a clear thick gingiva with slender teeth, a narrow zone of keratinized tissue and a high gingival scallop (cluster A2).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19419444     DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2009.01398.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Periodontol        ISSN: 0303-6979            Impact factor:   8.728


  66 in total

1.  Classification of periodontal biotypes with the use of CBCT. A cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Maria Nikiforidou; Lazaros Tsalikis; Christos Angelopoulos; Georgios Menexes; Ioannis Vouros; Antonios Konstantinides
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2015-12-22       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Characterization of maxillary central incisor: novel crown-root relationships.

Authors:  Jerónimo P Lazos; Luis F Senn; Mabel N Brunotto
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2013-12-07       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 3.  Interfaces between orthodontic and periodontal treatment: their current status.

Authors:  Christoph Reichert; Martin Hagner; Søren Jepsen; Andreas Jäger
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 1.938

4.  Gingival Biotype Assessment in a Healthy Periodontium: Transgingival Probing Method.

Authors:  R G Shiva Manjunath; Anju Rana; Arijit Sarkar
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2015-05-01

Review 5.  Clinical and esthetic outcomes of immediate implant placement compared to alveolar ridge preservation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Santiago Mareque; Pablo Castelo-Baz; Joaquín López-Malla; Juan Blanco; José Nart; Cristina Vallés
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2021-06-07       Impact factor: 3.573

6.  Gingival biotype revisited-novel classification and assessment tool.

Authors:  Kai R Fischer; Andreas Künzlberger; Nikolaos Donos; Stefan Fickl; Anton Friedmann
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2017-05-27       Impact factor: 3.573

7.  Ultrasonographic characterization of lingual structures pertinent to oral, periodontal, and implant surgery.

Authors:  Shayan Barootchi; Hsun-Liang Chan; Sharon S Namazi; Hom-Lay Wang; Oliver D Kripfgans
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2020-01-27       Impact factor: 5.977

8.  Assessment of gingival thickness using digital file superimposition versus direct clinical measurements.

Authors:  Emilio Couso-Queiruga; Mustafa Tattan; Uzair Ahmad; Christopher Barwacz; Oscar Gonzalez-Martin; Gustavo Avila-Ortiz
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2020-08-31       Impact factor: 3.573

9.  On the relationship between gingival morphotypes and different crown shape assessments in young Caucasians.

Authors:  Kai R Fischer; Timo Richter; Anton Friedmann; Stefan Fickl
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2016-01-22       Impact factor: 3.573

10.  Ultrasonography for diagnosis of peri-implant diseases and conditions: a detailed scanning protocol and case demonstration.

Authors:  Hsun-Liang Chan; Oliver D Kripfgans
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2020-02-06       Impact factor: 2.419

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.