PURPOSE: P-glycoprotein (Pgp) antagonists have had unpredictable pharmacokinetic interactions requiring reductions of chemotherapy. We report a phase I study using tariquidar (XR9576), a potent Pgp antagonist, in combination with vinorelbine. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Patients first received tariquidar alone to assess effects on the accumulation of (99m)Tc-sestamibi in tumor and normal organs and rhodamine efflux from CD56+ mononuclear cells. In the first cycle, vinorelbine pharmacokinetics was monitored after the day 1 and 8 doses without or with tariquidar. In subsequent cycles, vinorelbine was administered with tariquidar. Tariquidar pharmacokinetics was studied alone and with vinorelbine. RESULTS: Twenty-six patients were enrolled. Vinorelbine 20 mg/m(2) on day 1 and 8 was identified as the maximum tolerated dose (neutropenia). Nonhematologic grade 3/4 toxicities in 77 cycles included the following: abdominal pain (4 cycles), anorexia (2), constipation (2), fatigue (3), myalgia (2), pain (4) and dehydration, depression, diarrhea, ileus, nausea, and vomiting, (all once). A 150-mg dose of tariquidar: (1) reduced liver (99m)Tc-sestamibi clearance consistent with inhibition of liver Pgp; (2) increased (99m)Tc-sestamibi retention in a majority of tumor masses visible by (99m)Tc-sestamibi; and (3) blocked Pgp-mediated rhodamine efflux from CD56+ cells over the 48 hours examined. Tariquidar had no effects on vinorelbine pharmacokinetics. Vinorelbine had no effect on tariquidar pharmacokinetics. One patient with breast cancer had a minor response, and one with renal carcinoma had a partial remission. CONCLUSIONS: Tariquidar is a potent Pgp antagonist, without significant side effects and much less pharmacokinetic interaction than previous Pgp antagonists. Tariquidar offers the potential to increase drug exposure in drug-resistant cancers.
PURPOSE:P-glycoprotein (Pgp) antagonists have had unpredictable pharmacokinetic interactions requiring reductions of chemotherapy. We report a phase I study using tariquidar (XR9576), a potent Pgp antagonist, in combination with vinorelbine. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN:Patients first received tariquidar alone to assess effects on the accumulation of (99m)Tc-sestamibi in tumor and normal organs and rhodamine efflux from CD56+ mononuclear cells. In the first cycle, vinorelbine pharmacokinetics was monitored after the day 1 and 8 doses without or with tariquidar. In subsequent cycles, vinorelbine was administered with tariquidar. Tariquidar pharmacokinetics was studied alone and with vinorelbine. RESULTS: Twenty-six patients were enrolled. Vinorelbine 20 mg/m(2) on day 1 and 8 was identified as the maximum tolerated dose (neutropenia). Nonhematologic grade 3/4 toxicities in 77 cycles included the following: abdominal pain (4 cycles), anorexia (2), constipation (2), fatigue (3), myalgia (2), pain (4) and dehydration, depression, diarrhea, ileus, nausea, and vomiting, (all once). A 150-mg dose of tariquidar: (1) reduced liver (99m)Tc-sestamibi clearance consistent with inhibition of liver Pgp; (2) increased (99m)Tc-sestamibi retention in a majority of tumor masses visible by (99m)Tc-sestamibi; and (3) blocked Pgp-mediated rhodamine efflux from CD56+ cells over the 48 hours examined. Tariquidar had no effects on vinorelbine pharmacokinetics. Vinorelbine had no effect on tariquidar pharmacokinetics. One patient with breast cancer had a minor response, and one with renal carcinoma had a partial remission. CONCLUSIONS:Tariquidar is a potent Pgp antagonist, without significant side effects and much less pharmacokinetic interaction than previous Pgp antagonists. Tariquidar offers the potential to increase drug exposure in drug-resistant cancers.
Authors: John R Zalcberg; Jaap Verweij; Paolo G Casali; Axel Le Cesne; Peter Reichardt; Jean-Yves Blay; Marcus Schlemmer; Martine Van Glabbeke; Michelle Brown; Ian R Judson Journal: Eur J Cancer Date: 2005-08 Impact factor: 9.162
Authors: Jame Abraham; Susan Bakke; Ann Rutt; Beverly Meadows; Maria Merino; Richard Alexander; David Schrump; David Bartlett; Peter Choyke; Rob Robey; Elizabeth Hung; Seth M Steinberg; Susan Bates; Tito Fojo Journal: Cancer Date: 2002-05-01 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Philippe Labrie; Shawn P Maddaford; Jacques Lacroix; Concettina Catalano; David K H Lee; Suman Rakhit; René C Gaudreault Journal: Bioorg Med Chem Date: 2007-03-12 Impact factor: 3.641
Authors: William C Kreisl; Jeih-San Liow; Nobuyo Kimura; Nicholas Seneca; Sami S Zoghbi; Cheryl L Morse; Peter Herscovitch; Victor W Pike; Robert B Innis Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2010-03-17 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Samy A F Morad; Traci S Davis; Matthew R MacDougall; Su-Fern Tan; David J Feith; Dhimant H Desai; Shantu G Amin; Mark Kester; Thomas P Loughran; Myles C Cabot Journal: Biochem Pharmacol Date: 2017-02-09 Impact factor: 5.858
Authors: Jonathan E Kolitz; Stephen L George; Guido Marcucci; Ravi Vij; Bayard L Powell; Steven L Allen; Daniel J DeAngelo; Thomas C Shea; Wendy Stock; Maria R Baer; Vera Hars; Kati Maharry; Eva Hoke; James W Vardiman; Clara D Bloomfield; Richard A Larson Journal: Blood Date: 2010-06-03 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: Thomas Wanek; Claudia Kuntner; Jens P Bankstahl; Marion Bankstahl; Johann Stanek; Michael Sauberer; Severin Mairinger; Sabine Strommer; Volker Wacheck; Wolfgang Löscher; Thomas Erker; Markus Müller; Oliver Langer Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2011-10-08 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Francisco S Chung; Jayson S Santiago; Miguel Francisco M De Jesus; Camille V Trinidad; Melvin Floyd E See Journal: Am J Cancer Res Date: 2016-08-01 Impact factor: 6.166
Authors: Yilin Zhang; Shravan Kumar Sriraman; Hilary A Kenny; Ed Luther; Vladimir Torchilin; Ernst Lengyel Journal: Mol Cancer Ther Date: 2016-07-27 Impact factor: 6.261