Literature DB >> 19416575

Content of a complete routine second trimester obstetrical ultrasound examination and report.

Yvonne Cargill1, Lucie Morin2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To review the benefits of and requirements for a complete second trimester ultrasound and the documentation needed. OUTCOMES: A complete second trimester ultrasound provides information about the number of fetuses, the gestational age, the location of the placenta, and fetal and maternal anatomy. EVIDENCE: In the production of this document, the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine's "Practice Guideline for the Performance of Obstetric Ultrasound Examinations," the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists' practice bulletin, "Ultrasound in Pregnancy," and the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists' Working Party Report, "Ultrasound Screening" were reviewed. PubMed and the Cochrane Database were searched using the words "routine second trimester obstetrical ultrasound." VALUES: The evidence was evaluated using the guidelines developed by the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care. BENEFITS, HARMS, AND COSTS: A routine complete second trimester ultrasound between 18 and 22 weeks and a complete ultrasound report will provide the best opportunity to diagnose fetal anomalies and to assist in the management of prenatal care. It will also reduce the number of ultrasound examinations done during the second trimester for completion of fetal anatomy survey. The costs are those involved with the performance of obstetrical ultrasound. VALIDATION: This is a revision of previous guidelines; information from other consensus reviews from medical publications has been used. SPONSORS: The Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada. RECOMMENDATIONS: 1. Pregnant women should be offered a routine second trimester ultrasound between 18 and 22 weeks' gestation. (II-2B) 2. Second trimester ultrasound should screen for the number of fetuses, the gestational age, and the location of the placenta. (II-1A) 3. Second trimester ultrasound should screen for fetal anomalies. (II-2B).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19416575     DOI: 10.1016/S1701-2163(16)34127-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol Can        ISSN: 1701-2163


  14 in total

1.  Swedish University Students' Opinion Regarding Information About Soft Markers.

Authors:  Afsaneh Hayat Roshanai; Peter Lindgren; Karin Nordin; Charlotta Ingvoldstad
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2015-07-12       Impact factor: 2.537

2.  Advances in ultrasound imaging for congenital malformations during early gestation.

Authors:  William F Rayburn; Jennifer A Jolley; Lynn L Simpson
Journal:  Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol       Date:  2015-03-28

3.  Male-biased infant sex ratios and patterns of induced abortion.

Authors:  Abdool S Yasseen; Thierry Lacaze-Masmonteil
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2016-04-11       Impact factor: 8.262

4.  Cost-effectiveness of prenatal screening strategies for congenital heart disease.

Authors:  N M Pinto; R Nelson; M Puchalski; T D Metz; K J Smith
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 7.299

5.  Left Superior Vena Cava in the Fetus: A Rarely Isolated Anomaly.

Authors:  Anne-Frédérique Minsart; Isabelle Boucoiran; Marie-Ange Delrue; François Audibert; Sylvia Abadir; Chantale Lapierre; Emmanuelle Lemyre; Marie-Josée Raboisson
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2019-11-13       Impact factor: 1.655

6.  A comparison of standard two-dimensional ultrasound to three-dimensional volume sonography for routine second-trimester fetal imaging.

Authors:  M E Roy-Lacroix; F Moretti; Z M Ferraro; L Brosseau; J Clancy; K Fung-Kee-Fung
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2017-01-26       Impact factor: 2.521

7.  Clinical Utility of Fetal Short-Lag Spatial Coherence Imaging.

Authors:  Will Long; Dongwoon Hyun; Kingshuk Roy Choudhury; David Bradway; Patricia McNally; Brita Boyd; Sarah Ellestad; Gregg E Trahey
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2018-01-11       Impact factor: 2.998

8.  Differences in obstetric care among nulliparous First Nations and non-First Nations women in British Columbia, Canada.

Authors:  Corinne A Riddell; Jennifer A Hutcheon; Leanne S Dahlgren
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2015-11-02       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 9.  Advances in evaluating the fetal skeleton.

Authors:  Ann-Edwidge Noel; Richard N Brown
Journal:  Int J Womens Health       Date:  2014-05-13

Review 10.  Neural tube defects: from a proteomic standpoint.

Authors:  Tania M Puvirajesinghe; Jean-Paul Borg
Journal:  Metabolites       Date:  2015-03-17
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.